Skip to main content

Table 1 Hierarchical AMOVAs for each matrix analyzed showing as sources of variation FCT, FSC and FST respectively

From: The geography of evolutionary divergence in the highly endemic avifauna from the Sierra Madre del Sur, Mexico

Dataset

Groupings

Source of variation

Sum of squares

Variance components

Percentage of variation

Statistics

Significance (p)

Aulacorhynchus

(NP) (CR-NP) (EMx-NCA) (SMS)

Among groups

368.978

19.644

84.62

FCT = 0.846

0.091

Among populations within groups

8.928

1.382

5.96

FSC = 0.387

< 0.00001

Within populations

52.51

2.187

9.42

FST = 0.905

< 0.00001

Chlorospingus

(TM) (N Chiapas) (SMO) (SMS) (NCA) (SCA)

Among groups

702.506

15.108

79.51

FCT = 0.795

0.053

Among populations within groups

7.792

1.949

10.26

FSC = 0.5

0.041

Within populations

89.4

1.943

10.23

FST = 0.897

< 0.00001

Cardellina

(TMVB) (SMS) (SMOc) (C. versicolor)

Among groups

195.29

12.94493

71.09

FCT = 0.71094

0.1564

Among populations within groups

69.803

2.5099

13.78

FSC = 0.47687

< 0.00001

Within populations

162.447

2.753

15.12

FST = 0.84879

< 0.00001

Eupherusa

(E. nigriventris) (E. cyanophrys) (E. poliocerca) (E. eximia) (T. ridgwayi)

Among groups

392.306

18.846

93.16

FCT = 0.9314

0.077

Among populations within groups

4

0.654

3.23

FSC = 0.472

0.1886

Within populations

15.324

0.729

3.61

FST = 0.963

< 0.00001