Skip to main content

Meiotic recombination in the offspring of Microbotryum hybrids and its impact on pathogenicity



Hybridization is a central mechanism in evolution, producing new species or introducing important genetic variation into existing species. In plant-pathogenic fungi, adaptation and specialization to exploit a host species are key determinants of evolutionary success. Here, we performed experimental crosses between the two pathogenic Microbotryum species, M. lychnidis-dioicae and M. silenes-acaulis that are specialized to different hosts. The resulting offspring were analyzed on phenotypic and genomic levels to describe genomic characteristics of hybrid offspring and genetic factors likely involved in host-specialization.


Genomic analyses of interspecific fungal hybrids revealed that individuals were most viable if the majority of loci were inherited from one species. Interestingly, species-specific loci were strictly controlled by the species’ origin of the mating type locus. Moreover we detected signs of crossing over and chromosome duplications in the genomes of the analyzed hybrids. In Microbotryum, mitochondrial DNA was found to be uniparentally inherited from the a2 mating type. Genome comparison revealed that most gene families are shared and the majority of genes are conserved between the two species, indicating very similar biological features, including infection and pathogenicity processes. Moreover, we detected 211 candidate genes that were retained under host-driven selection of backcrossed lines. These genes and might therefore either play a crucial role in host specialization or be linked to genes that are essential for specialization.


The combination of genome analyses with experimental selection and hybridization is a promising way to investigate host-pathogen interactions. This study manifests genetic factors of host specialization that are required for successful biotrophic infection of the post-zygotic stage, but also demonstrates the strong influence of intra-genomic conflicts or instabilities on the viability of hybrids in the haploid host-independent stage.


Hybridization is now realized as a common and important evolutionary mechanism in the diversification of species, particularly for plant-pathogenic fungi. By the successful crossing of hetero-specific individuals, genetic material of both species is transmitted and the infusion of new allelic combinations and recovery from fixed genetic load loci can have marked impacts on fitness and adaptive potential. Molecular analyses have revealed that hybridization occurs in different multiple groups of fungal plant pathogens, e.g., Microbotryum violaceum, Zymoseptoria pseudotritici, Cryptococcus neoformans [1,2,3,4]. In particular, naturally occurring hybridization can lead to new pathogenic species, accelerated by new gene combinations and subsequent adaptive specialization.

Central to the ecology of pathogenic fungi is their adaptation to exploit the host environment, and there is broad variation in host specialization and adaptation among pathogens [5]. This form of adaptation to the host can strongly impact patterns of speciation [6, 7]. In contrast to generalists, which are able to infect several different often only distantly related host species, specialized, or host-specific, pathogens are highly adapted to one or few, often closely related, host species. In plant-pathogenic fungi, host specificity is often characteristic of the biotrophic lifestyle, where the fungi colonize and exploit living host tissues [8]. These biotrophic fungi often produce ‘effector’ proteins. Effector proteins are secreted by the fungi into the apoplast or even into the host cell, where they are reported to modify the host defenses, cell structure, metabolism and function [9]. Molecular analyses of diverse biotrophic species show that, besides the existence of effector proteins that are conserved among taxa, there can also occur species-specific effectors that are highly variable and can interact with host receptor molecules with arms-race dynamics [5, 10]. While pathogenicity determinants, including effectors, have been described for a reasonable number of fungal pathogens, the genetics and genomics for genes shaping host specificity seem to be more difficult to resolve [5]. Genome and secretome (i.e. all secreted proteins) analyses of fungal species with different lifestyles revealed a great repertoire of effector proteins that are common in fungi to promote virulence and interact with the host. However, the function of such effector proteins or their role in specialization is often unclear [5, 11].

The process of hybridization can combine adaptive traits of different pathogenic species [12]. There is growing recognition of the threat of hybrid pathogens, which arise in part due to the new combinations of specific effector repertoires found in the parental pathogen species [13]. Thus, hybrid pathogens have been observed to emerge, causing new diseases with altered host affinities [14, 15]. Moreover, there is molecular evidence from the study of natural and experimentally created hybrids for a role of particular genes involved in pathogenicity [13]. For example, the rust Melampsora × columbia is a hybrid species derived from M. medusae and M. occidentalis and evolved when a poplar host resistant to the two parental species was widely grown in California [16]. Under experimental evolution, the Neurospora crassa × N. intermedia hybrids have been used to gain a better understanding of genetics underlying traits of reproductive incompatibility between species [17]. Due to the importance to natural and agricultural ecosystems, in combination with tractability as genetic and genomic models, hybrid fungal pathogens offer strong potential to advance our understanding of the molecular basis of host range through experimental crosses and host-specific selection. Thus, especially in the light of host-driven selection, the host-pathogen interactions of hybrid fungi and the dynamics of their genome composition can reveal insight on host specialization in fungi.

The basidiomycetous genus Microbotryum includes a species complex of biotrophic plant pathogens causing anther-smut disease. Some species in this complex colonize and sporulate in the flowers of plants in the Caryophyllaceae family. Largely restricted to natural ecosystems, many Microbotryum species, including the group of anther smuts on members of the genus Silene, are specialized on one host species [18]. The pathogenic life-cycle and mating system proceed as follows. Infected host plants are sterilized through the replacement of pollen by diploid fungal spores and the inhibition of ovary development. After transmission from diseased to healthy plants, spores germinate and undergo meiosis, resulting in yeast-like haploid cells with two mating types a1 and a2. Mating types are determined by largely non-recombining mating type chromosomes that carry genes that are needed for conjugation, e.g., pheromone/pheromone receptor and mating type homeodomain genes [19]. Conjugation between cells with opposite mating types occurs and infectious structures are formed: dikaryotic hyphae with appressoria grow and enter the host, maintaining infection in meristems until, in floral development, the fungus sporulates in the anthers [20]. Although the genome and transcriptome of Microbotryum lychnidis-dioiceae have been recently analyzed, providing first insights into genetic features of its pathogenicity and life-cycle [21,22,23], the genetics of host specificity in Microbotryum are as yet poorly understood in relation to the group of related hosts and multiple pathogenic species.

Here, we use an experimental crossing approach to study traits of hybridization in relation to host adaptation in Microbotryum. Therefore, we combine infection studies using hybrids and backcrosses with the analyses of genomes of selected offspring. First, we use experimental hybrids and backcrosses to study hybridization events and the effects on infection ability, with special regards to the role of compatibility between mating type chromosomes from different species. Second, we compare the genomes of two highly host-specific Microbotryum species and describe characteristics of specialization on genomic and phenotypic levels. Third, we use the experimental hybrids and backcrosses to select for host-specificity loci, leading to the identification of candidate genes involved in host-specific virulence in Microbotryum.


Infection rates and viability of the parental species, F1- and F2-hybrids

In order to estimate species-specific pathogenicity, infection rates for both parental Microbotryum species and hybrid offspring were estimated on the host Silene latifolia (Fig. 1). The Microbotryum species demonstrated strong host specificity upon experimental inoculation. From 50 S. latifolia plants that were inoculated with its endemic pathogen Microbotryum lychnidis-dioiceae (MSL), a proportion of 0.79 became diseased, while none of the 50 plants inoculated with M. silenes-acaulis (MSA) exhibited disease symptoms (Fig. 2). Microbotryum F1-hybrids caused disease but at rates lower than the M. lychnidis-dioiceae parental species. Silene latifolia plants inoculated with F1-hybrids between the Microbotryum species MSL and MSA, showed an infection rate of 0.06 on average, with plants inoculated using F1-hybrids where the a1 mating type chromosome derived from MSL (A1-MSLpar × A2-MSApar) showed only non-significant marginally higher infection rates (0.06) than F1-hybrids where the a2 mating type chromosome derived from MSL (A1-MSApar × A2-MSLpar) (0.05).

Fig. 1

Crossing scheme that is used for the selection of host specificity loci in Microbotryum

Fig. 2

Infection rates of intra- and inter-specific crosses on the host S. latifolia

Microbotryum F1-hybrids were able to produce viable meiotic products that could successfully mate. While spores of each F1 type showed successful germination after one to 2 days on culture media, for the hybrid type A1-MSLpar × A2-MSApar we were able to isolate 31 cultures for the a1 mating type (A1-MSLhyb) and 64 cultures for the a2 mating type (A2-MSAhyb) with positive conjugation ability. For the second hybrid type (A1-MSApar × A2-MSLpar) 46 a1 (A1-MSAhyb) cultures and 50 a2 cultures (A2-MSLhyb) were isolated with confirmed conjugation ability.

From plants inoculated with haploid mixtures that produce the backcrossed F2 pathogen generation, 5 to 19 plants were infected per treatment (infection proportion between 0.01 and 0.04). Those treatments where both mating types were derived from MSA (homospecific backcross) showed lower but not significantly differing infection rates (A1-MSAhyb × A2-MSApar: 0.01, A2-MSAhyb × A1-MSApar: 0.01) than treatments where one mating type was derived from MSL (heterospecific backcross) (A1-MSLhyb × A2-MSApar: 0.04; A2-MSLhyb × A1-MSApar: 0.02) (Fig. 2). Among the F2-backcrosses pathogens, the two heterospecific backcrosses A1-MSLhyb × A2-MSApar and A2-MSLhyb × A1-MSApar and the homospecific backcross A2-MSAhyb × A1-MSApar had successful germination of teliospores, while for the genotype A1-MSAhyb × A2-MSApar no successful germination of teliospores was observed. For the heterospecific backcross A2-MSLhyb × A1-MSApar haploid isolates were viable and isolated and sequenced as described above (Fig. 1).

Sequencing of genomes and genetic distance

For molecular analyses of the two host-specific species and their hybrids, genomes were sequenced. For eleven of twelve genomes, the number of obtained reads varied from 4.4 to 5.7 million after pre-processing, except for one of the F1-hybrid isolate A1-MSLhyb where only 101,986 reads were obtained.

The mapping of parental reads against the reference genome from MSL resulted in 0.99 of MSL reads that could be mapped, while only 0.92 of the MSA could be mapped. Assembly statistics of the MSL a1 and a2 genomes with the reference genome as target and the M. silenes-acaulis are in shown in Table 1. From the 7364 reference genes, 7320 could be detected in the MSL a1 genome and 7205 in the MSL a2 genome (average: 7263), while 7134 and 7127 were detected in the MSA a1 and a2 genomes (average: 7134), respectively (Table 1). Alignments between genome assemblies of MSLpar and MSApar resulted in 5751 and 5433.

Table 1 Assembly statistics of the four parental genomes M. lychnidis-dioicae (MSL) (a1 and a2) and M. silenes-acaulis (MSA) (a1 and a2)

homologues for A1-MSLpar vs A1-MSApar and A2-MSLpar vs A2-MSApar, respectively, with an average nucleotide identity of 0.94 (Table 2). Genetic distance of hybrid genomes to parental genomes was estimated by differences in karyotypic electropherograms. Comparison of hybrid and parental genomes revealed that genome size and structure of all hybrids were similar to parental sizes and no apparent allopolyploidy or genome duplication occurred. However, pairwise electropherogram comparisons were more similar for mating type chromosomes in hybrid and parental strains derived from the same species (Table 2). Genetic distance based on nucleotide identity showed the same trend. For the hybrid genotypes A1- or A2-MSLhyb, genetic distance to the MSLpar was lower than to MSApar, while for the hybrid types A1- or A2-MSAhyb genetic distance to MSApar was lower than to MSLpar (Table 2).

Table 2 Genetic distance between F1-hybrid genomes and the parental MSL and MSA genomes, based on a) karyotype analysis and b) single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)

Origin of sequences in hybrids

The “global approach” allowed the assignment of sequence reads from hybrid individuals into one of five paired-origin classes and indicated the occurrence of all pair types in each hybrid. Under k = 15, the proportion of reads assigning to “unknown origin” was minimal in most hybrid and backcross genomes and varied from 0.004 to 0.020. Moreover, there was a reasonable proportion of reads in all hybrid genomes that originated undistinguished “from either genome” (0.08–0.16) (Fig. 3). The likely explanation of hybrid reads from types 1 (read derives from MSL) and 2 (read derives from MSA) showed a typical pattern depending on the occurrence of the species-specific mating type chromosome: In hybrids, where the mating type chromosomes derived from MSL parent, a much higher proportion of reads originated from MSL (Average proportion of reads: A1-MSLhyb: 0.65; A2-MSLhyb: 0.89) than from MSA (Average proportion of reads: A1-MSAhyb: 0.21; A2-MSAhyb: 0.01). In accordance, hybrids harboring the MSA mating chromosomes showed a higher proportion of MSA reads (average proportion of reads: A1-MSAhyb: 0.62; A2-MSAhyb: 0.76) than MSL reads (average proportion of reads: A1-MSLhyb: 0.28; A2-MSLhyb: 0.1), although the species-specific bias was not as strong as in the hybrids with MSL mating type chromosome (Fig. 3). For the F2 backcross genomes, where hybrid individuals have been backcrossed to the MSA parent, the proportions of reads deriving from MSA was slightly higher than in the F1-hybrid genomes. Proportion of MSL reads varied from 0.31 to 0.45 and proportion of MSA reads varied from 0.44 to 0.60 (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3

Species’ origin of sequences in F1-hybrids and F2-backcrosses

The “gene-dependent” approach, based on the number of inherited genes, indicated similar inheritance patterns similar to the “global approach”. The total number of genes or partial genes that could be detected in the F1-hybrids genomes varied from 5010 to 7206. As above, the ratio of parental genes in a hybrid was dependent on the direction of the cross: for F1-haploid hybrid genomes where the a1 mating type chromosomes derived from MSL, a higher number of MSLpar genes (average: 4735) than MSApar genes (average: 144) was counted, while for hybrid genomes, where the a2 mating type chromosomes derived from MSA, a higher number of MSA genes (average: 4031) than MSL genes (average: 1821) were counted (Fig. 3). The other way around, for F1-haploid hybrid genomes where the a1 mating type chromosomes derived from MSA, a higher number of MSApar genes (average: 6007) than MSLpar genes (average: 160) were counted, while for hybrid genomes, where the a2 mating type chromosomes derived from MSL, a higher number of MSL genes (average: 6459) than MSA genes (average: 24) were counted (Fig. 3). In total, the F1-hybrids harbored more genes inherited by the MSL parent (26347) than genes inherited by the MSA parent (20374), which did not differ significantly (t = 0.54, p = 0.3). F1-hybrid-produced haploid genomes of the genotypes A1-MSAhyb showed the lowest number of MSL genes (Fig. 3). The numbers of genes that were similar to both parents and thus could not be tracked varied from 593 to 1697.

For the two genomes of the F2-backcrosses, both genomes showed a lower proportion of MSA genes than the 0.75 expected assuming random recombination and no selection. One F2 isolate contained 2294 MSL genes and 3957 MSA genes (0.37 vs. 0.63), while the other F2 isolate contained 3177 MSL genes and 3251 MSA genes (0.49 vs. 0.51). We identified 211 genes deriving from MSL that were present in all viable F1-hybrid genomes (genotypes A1-MSLhyb, A2-MSAhyb, A2-MSLhyb) and the F2-backcross genomes.

Although there was a tendency that F1-hybrids with higher MSL gene content showed higher infection ability than hybrids with lower MSL gene content, correlation was not significant (r = 0.75; p = 0.25) (Additional file 1).

Genome structure of hybrid genomes and mitochondrial inheritance (Fig. 4)

For all F1-hybrids and two F2-backcrosses, most reads could be assigned to one of the parental species and aligned to the 21 reference scaffolds. However, for one of the eight F1-hybrids (genotype: A1-MSLhyb) coverage depth was too low to visualize it along the scaffolds, and thus it was excluded for visualization. Considering the coverage depth of alignments to both parental species at a certain locus, the visualization allows the estimation of the species origin of chromosomes/ scaffolds and chromosomal segment in the hybrid genomes (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4

Coverage depth of hybrid genomes. Histograms represent coverage depth of hybrid genomes that are aligned against the the M. lychnidis-dioicae (MSL) parent genome (outer blue circle) and the M. silenes-acaulis (MSA) parent genome (outer red circle). Blue histograms represent coverage depth for reads deriving from the MSL parent and red histograms represent coverage depth for reads deriving from the MSA parent. F2 hybrid genotypes (outside to inside): A2-MSLhyb × A1-MSApar, A2-MSLhyb × A1-MSApar, A1-MSLhyb × A2-MSApar, A2-MSAhyb × A1-MSApar

Inheritance of chromosomes or major pieces of chromosomes - visualized by the histograms - showed a clear pattern depending on the origin of the mating type chromosome: For the three F1-hybrid genomes, which harbour the mating type chromosome from MSL (A1-MSLhyb or A2-MSLhyb), nearly all chromosomes were inherited from the MSL parent. A similar pattern became visible for the two hybrid genomes where the a1 mating type chromosome derives from the MSA parent (A1-MSAhyb) parent: nearly all chromosomes were inherited from the MSA parent. Interestingly, in the two F1-hybrid genomes where the a2 mating type chromosome derives from MSA (A2-MSAhyb), it seemed that recombination occurred: although a majority of chromosomes were inherited by the MSA parent, there were some full chromosomes or chromosome arms inherited by the MSL parent. Additionally, those genomes exhibited the results of recombination within single chromosomes, where some pieces (>1Mbp) derived from the MSL parent and some pieces from the MSA parent. Moreover, it seemed that for some chromosomes (e.g., S08) both parental chromosomes are present in the hybrid genomes, suggesting the occurrence of aneuploidy (Fig. 4). For the two haploid F2 isolates of the genotype A2-MSLhyb × A1-MSApar a higher degree of recombination could be seen, where chromosomes/ chromosome pieces derived either from MSL or MSA.

In contrast to the inheritance patterns described above, the origin of mitochondrial sequences showed a different trend: The hybrid genotypes A1-MSLhyb and A2-MSAhyb that derive from the cross A1-MSLpar × A2-MSApar harbour the mitochondrial sequences from the MSA parent, while the hybrid genotypes A1-MSAhyb and A2-MSLhyb that derive from the cross A1-MSApar × A2-MSLpar harbour the mitochondrial sequences from the MSL parent. Thus, it seems that mitochondrial sequences were inherited by some control mechanism dependent on the a2 mating type chromosome.

Host adaptation and candidate genes involved in specialization

From 279 genes coding for small secreted proteins (SSP) in the reference genome from the reference M. lychnidis-dioiceae genome Lamole p1A1, we found 278 in the MSL genomes and 273 in the MSA genomes, exhibiting a lower average between-species identity than non-secreted proteins (SSP: 0.93, non SSP: 0.94) (Fig. 5). There was no significant difference in the distribution of those genes, indicating no dissimilarity (Kolmogorov-Smirnov-Test, P-value = 0.94). For the 236 annotated CAZymes we found 236 in the MSL genomes but only 231 were detected in the MSA genomes, exhibiting a slightly higher similarity (CAZymes: 0.95, complete set of genes: 0.94) than average between-species identity than the complete set of genes (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5

Distribution of nucleotide identities of all protein-encoding genes occurring in both species’ genomes

Counts of genes from selected PFAM groups in both species’ genomes indicated candidate genes involved in host specificity. Results showed that for most PFAM groups, copy numbers of genes for MSL and MSA were identical, and only three families exhibited different numbers of genes: A Secretory lipase (PF03583.7:) (Number of genes in MSL: 7, Number of genes in MSA: 6), Major Facilitator Superfamily (PF07690.9) (Number of genes in MSL: 119, Number of genes in MSA: 115) and Zinc knuckle (PF00098.16) (Number of genes in MSL: 7, Number of genes in MSA: 5) (Table 3).

Table 3 Count genes occurring in parental genomes, F1-hybrid and F2-backcross genomes

From 211 MSL genes that were consistently present in the viable F1-hybrid genomes (Additional file 2), 10 genes (proportion 0.047) corresponded to the group of secreted proteins, which was slightly higher than the proportion of secreted proteins among all genes in the reference genome. Most of them were with unknown function. For two genes (MVLG_00826 and MVLG_00897) PHI results emphasized best BLAST hits for a chitinase from Trichoderma (CHT42) (Identity: 25.87 and 32.17; evalue: 6E-13 and 2E-13). Those two genes fall into the group of CAZymes, where we detected 10 genes in total (proportion 0.047). Here, six genes grouped to the class of Glycosyl Hydrolase (GH), two genes to the class of carbohydrate esterase (CE) and two genes to the class gycosyl transferase (GT). Beside the chitinase hits, one gene of the class of Glycosyl Hydrolase (MVLG_06984) showed a blast hit for the Ustilago maydis gene (um00446) (Identitity: 57.75; evalue: 6E-23), which is still uncharacterized.

Regarding the genes from selected PFAM groups, we detected three genes that were present in all F2-hybrid genomes. One gene encoded for a secretory lipase (MVLG_7229), and displays the lipase that was not present in the MSA genome. The two other genes belonged to the Major Facilitator Superfamily (MVLG_00763 and MVLG_06941). PHI results showed that one of them (MVLG_06941) corresponded to the sucrose transporter Srt1 in Ustilgao maydis (Identity: 26.22; evalue: 4E-16) and a transporter Hxs1 in Cryptococcus (Identity: 36.68; evalue:1E-54), while the best BLAST hit for the second gene corresponded to a transmembrane transporter of Giberella (GzMyb019) (Identity: 22.22; evalue:1E-05).


In the present study, we combine infection experiments of host-specific pathogen species and their hybrid offspring, with a focus on their genomic content, providing a better understanding of hybridization and the genetics of host adaptation in plant-fungus interactions.

Infection ability of hybrids and their genomic composition

In order to gain insights into genetic differences between sibling pathogen species and to identify genes relevant for host specificity, we investigated fungal hybrids by successful crossing of two distinct fungal species Microbotryum lychnidis-dioicae (MSL) and M. silenes-acauli (MSA) naturally occurring only on their host species Silene latifola and S. acaulis, respectively. The sequenced hybrid strains represent haploid offspring of teliospores after meiosis and germination. Infection experiments on the host species S. latifolia supported a high degree of specialization of these two pathogens, since none of these host plants became infected by M. silenes-acaulis, while M. lychnidis-dioicae successfully infected the host at high rates. Furthermore, the generated hybrids showed the ability to infect the S. latifolia host. The hybrid infection rate was lower in comparison to the parental species that is adapted to the host (MSL), but higher than the non-adapted species (MSA). These results are supported by previous studies with hybrids between different Microbotryum species [24, 25]. A lower infection ability can be due to extrinsic factors (e.g., lack of adaptation to the host environment) or intrinsic factors (e.g., intra-genomic conflicts which occur by combining the set of genes of the two species) that decrease the fitness of hybrids [26, 27].

Consistent with host specialization being strongly determined by genetic traits in this system, the genome analyses of all haploids derived from F1-hybrids revealed a higher number of genes deriving from the fungal species adapted to the host than genes deriving from the non-adapted fungus, supporting the idea that MSL-specific genes contribute to a successful infection. Moreover, F1-hybrids with a higher MSL gene content were more infectious than those with lower MSL content. These results reveal that infection of the host S. latifolia is facilitated by a higher proportion of species-specific M. lychnidis-dioicae genes and their appropriate adaptations to the host and that extrinsic factors play an important role in the maintenance of distinction fungal lineages within the Microbotryum complex [26, 27].

Even though extrinsic factors involving the pathogenic specificities likely influences the genic content of hybrid lineages, multiple insights were also available on the intrinsic incompatibilities between genomes from the fungal species. Sequence analyses and karyotypes showed a similar genome size in the viable F1-hybrid isolates compared to the parental isolates, which might indicate that homoploid hybrid gametes are more viable than aneuploidy and thus contribute either to continuation of the homoploid hybrid lineage or facilitate backcrossing to the parental lineages. Examples of homoploid hybrid speciation have been shown for some plant species, e.g., [28].

Inheritance patterns of species-specific genes or chromosomes did not follow the 50/50 ratio as it would be expected in meiotic products of the F1-hybrids. Especially, hybrid progeny that harbours the MSL mating type chromosome (A1-MSLhyb/A2-MSLhyb) closely resembles the parental genomes. It seems that meiotic products were most viable if the majority of loci were inherited from a single species. Especially, if we consider, that only successfully mated hybrids and backcrosses are able to infect host plants and therefore the bias towards functional genome organization is extremely high in this experiment. This illustrates the strong influence of intra-genomic incompatibilities in F1-hybrids, e.g., genomic incompatibilities between interacting alleles, Dobzhansky-Muller interactions [29] or negative epistasis effects, as has been reported for yeast hybrids [30].

An alternative hypothesis would be that these F1 progeny were not the result of hybridization and meiosis but originated from an asexual budding event of the mated product, as it has been reported for Cryptococcus neoformans [31]. However, this possibility is very unlikely, as we would have a dikaryon containing the nuclei from MSL, thus a solopathogenic strain that can produce teliospores in the host’s anther. Solopathogenic strains have been previously reported for Ustilago maydis [32], but to our knowledge, this has not been described for Microbotryum.

Exchange of genomic contents and speciation

Although hybridization occurs in nature [33], including in this fungal system [1], genetics underlying the role of hybrids in speciation or introgression are incompletely understood. Genome analyses of the experimental Microbotryum hybrids showed a lack of recombination in three of four post-meiotic genotypes of hybrid genomes, supporting the importance of genetic homogeneity for viable hybrids in Microbotryum, as discussed above. Additionally, the mating type chromosomes seem to play a crucial role in intra-genomic compatibility. Depending on the species of origin, the mating type chromosome seems to be the strongest determinant of the amount of inherited species-specific genetic information. Such an effect of mating type chromosomes and linked genes thus might play a central role for hybridization and also speciation in Microbotryum. In the hybrid genotypes with a2 mating type chromosomes derived from MSA, recombination events (i.e. exchange of genes within a chromosome) were detected, supporting the idea of potential large gene exchanges during hybridization events. Additionally, the data show a chromosome duplication (Contig S08 in isolate C1), revealing this as a possible mechanism for the expansion of genetic regions. Although past events of hybridization and introgressive backcrossing have been detected in the Microbotryum complex [1], this is the first time genetic exchange is shown in experimental hybrids. There are different studies using whole genome approaches to detect events of recombination in relation to adaptive traits. For example, it seems that in the plant pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici, genes contributing to higher rates of adaptive evolution are located in regions of high recombination [13]. In this context, we hypothesize that the studying of further experimental hybrids in combination with recombination analyses or patterns of genes that are associated with adaptation could be a strategy to identify introgressions of new genes that are relevant for the infection of new hosts.

The genomic analyses of F1-hybrids allowed us to track inheritance patterns of mitochondrial sequences. In the hybrids mitochondrial sequences were not inherited randomly, since all F1- and F2-hybrids contained the mitochondrial genes from the parent with the a2-mating type. This uniparental mitochondrial inheritance is known for Microbotryum [34] and other basidiomycetes. In Cryptococcus and Ustilago species, the mitochondrial uniparental inheritance is shown to be controlled by the a2 (or MATa) mating type [35, 36], consistent with our findings. This suggests conserved molecular mechanisms over mitochondrial inheritance across Basidiomycota. However, the molecular mechanisms of mitochondrial inheritance and its relevance for hybrid individuals remains to be determined.

Genetics of host-adaptation and host-specificity candidates

The potential for hybridization or the introgression of genes to generate new genetic diversity strictly depends on the resulting phenotype of the offspring. Especially in plant-pathogenic fungi, there is growing interest in understanding the genetic basis of host adaptation and specificity. Genome comparison of the two species M. silenes-acualis and M. lychnidis-dioicae revealed that most gene families are shared and the majority of genes are conserved over 95% identity at the sequence level (Fig. 3), indicating that both species possess very similar biological features. Genes encoding small secreted proteins (SSPs) are known to be under diversifying selection, indicating their important role for specialization to the host, as is known from other biotrophic pathogens [5]. In our study, the proportion of those genes were similar in the genomes of both species but showed slightly lower nucleotide identity than the complete genome set. Beckerson et al. 2019 also found SSPs to be differentiated among Microbotryum species and also more often under positive selection.

Furthermore it is assumed that the expansion and deletion of certain gene families can be relevant indicators of species-specific interactions [37, 38]. From 7285 detected genes in the MSL genome, we found 7132 orthologs in the MSA genome. Additionally, the similarity between genes of the two (0.94) is remarkably high. Regarding genes from selected PFAM domains that appeared to be expanded in M. lychdnidis-diocae [22], we identified one secreted lipase in our study (MVLG_7229) that occurred in both M. lychnidis-dioacae parents and was absent in the M. silenes-acaulis parents, however it was detected in all viable F1 and F2-hybrid genomes. It is known that in plant-pathogenic fungi, lipases can promote propagule adhesion and plant tissue penetration [39]. Moreover, lipases can be involved in nutrient uptake from the host or in the inhibition of immunity-related callose formation [40]. Similarly, two genes of the Major Facilitator Superfamily domain family were missing in the M. silenes-acaulis genomes, but were present in all F2 genomes. Genes from this family often encode for membrane proteins and are involved in transmembrane transport processes [41]. Comparison to the PHI-base revealed similarity to the sugar transporter Srt1 in Ustilago maydis and Frt1 in Botrytis indicating substrate-specific transport in M. lychnidis-diocae. These findings are also supported by the results of the recent genome analyses by [42]: they found facility transporters and a secreted lipase in Microbotryum to be under positive selection, reinforcing the idea that selection upon those genes in the host-species-driven selection is a reflections of their involvement in host adaptation.

So far, none of the above mentioned genes have been identified specifically as genes mediating host-specificity in prior studies, but our approach using experimental backcrossed hybrids indicates that some of them might be relevant for infecting S. latifolia or at least their specific regulation during the infection process is relevant for successful sporulation on the respective host (Fig. 1). By the application of experimental selection, we identified a set of 211 Microbotryum lychnidis-dioceae genes that were present in infectious F1-hybrids and haploid F2-backcrosses (Additional file 2). Within those genes the proportion of genes encoding for secreted proteins and CAZymes was higher than in the entire genome. Secreted CAZymes are required for plant infection. Most of the detected CAZymes belonged to the GH18 family, known for breaking glycosidic bonds in the plant wall [43] [22]. showed that M. lychnidis- dioicae is lacking xylanases, which might indicate the high relevance of glycosyl hydrolases for cell wall degradation [37]. showed that these hydrolases are highly upregulated during infection in Melampsora and Puccinia.

In conclusion, the limited number of hybrids, that were analyzed, does not allow to directly infer genotype-phenotype relations. However, the discussed genes represent an initial set of candidate genes responsible for specialization that will have to be tested in further studies. For example, the effect of those candidate genes during infection could be examined by knockout mutants.


The use of experimental fungal hybrids in combination with infection assays and genome analyses is a promising way to investigate the evolution of hybridization and host specialization in pathogenic interactions. The study demonstrates the importance of intra-genomic compatibility in hybrids and the high influence of the species-specific mating type chromosomes in fungal hybrids. Additionally, experimental selection and the analyses of selected functional groups reveal the importance of small secreted proteins for host-specific interaction and provide a subset for candidate genes involved in host-specificity, that present a valuable base of further investigations.


Studied species

The two Microbotryum species, M. lychnidis-dioicae (MSL) and M. silenes-acaulis (MSA), belong to the group of the anther-smut fungi on the Caryophyllaceae, occurring on the host species Silene latifolia and Silene acaulis, respectively. The current study uses the MSL strain “Lamole” ([22, 44]) and the MSA strain from [45]. The two hosts are perennial species that are adapted to different ecological niches. While S. latifolia is a short-lived perennial weed that grows in open disturbed habitats, S. acaulis is a very long-lived perennial that is restricted to arctic-alpine environments in the northern hemisphere ([46]).

Host specificity of parental Microbotryum strains

Viability and host specificity of the two parental Microbotryum species, M. lychnidis-dioiceae and M. silenes-acaulis, were estimated by infection ability following experimental inoculation on the host S. latifolia. Seeds of the host species S. latifolia (Hadley Population, Massachusetts (2012), 42.34339–72.612127) were collected by Michael M. Hood according to national and international legislation. Especially, all sampling material and experiments were complying to the rules of the Convention on the Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. Seed were surface-sterilized in a solution containing 10% bleach, 50% ethanol and 40% sterile water and germinated at 24 °C on 0.8% agar with 0.1 × MS salts [47].

For the inoculum, pairs of haploid isolates of a1 and a2 mating types from the same meiosis were prepared for both species (by the germination of the field-collected teliospores on potato dextrose agar (PDA; Difco), followed by isolation of meiotic tetrads using micromanipulation, as reported by [48]. Mating types of the haploid, yeast-like cultures were determined by PCR amplification of the pheromone receptor gene, as by [49]. For intraspecific mating and inoculation, each culture was suspended at 4 × 107 cells/mL on sterile deionized water, and suspensions of opposite mating type were mixed in equal amounts. Inoculum was applied to 50 S. latifolia plants per fungal species by pipetting 4 μL of the cell suspension onto the apical meristem of 10-days-old seedlings and incubating at 15 °C for 2 days. Afterwards seedlings were transplanted to soil and grown under greenhouse conditions [50]. When plants flowered, the number of healthy and diseased plants (i.e. flowers with spore-filled anthers) was recorded.

Production of F1-hybrids

Analyses were based on inoculation of host plants with experimental hybrids between the two fungal species, M. lychnidis-dioicae and M. silenes-acaulis, in reciprocal combinations that allowed us to separately assess the effect of the mating type chromosomes. With regard to the mating type locus, two combinations of Microbotryum F1-hybrids were generated: F1-hybrids with the a1 mating type from M. lychnidis-dioicae and the a2 mating type from M. silenes-acaulis (referred to as A1-MSLpar × A2-MSApar; “par” indicating parental species) and the reciprocal F1-hybrids (referred to as A1-MSApar × A2-MSLpar) (Fig. 1). For the interspecific inoculum, the four haploid parental isolates were used as described above, with mixtures of cell suspensions from opposite mating type from different species. For each crossing-combination 4 μl of inoculum were applied to 50 plants following the procedure described above.

Production of F2-backcrosses

To enrich for host-specificity loci, selection was imposed by the particular host species environment upon F2-backcrossed genotypes. Haploid gametes derived from the F1-hybrids were backcrossed to the original haploid parental strains of M. silenes-acaulis (MSA) and again inoculated onto the host S. latifolia. Under the expectation of free recombination, these genome combinations were expected to be approximately ¾ MSA and ¼ MSL, while the selective environment was the native host of MSL. Regarding the possible origins of the mating types (e.g., A1-MSLhyb, A2-MSLhyb, A1-MSAhyb, A2-MSAhyb, where the species abbreviation indicates the parental origin of the mating type chromosome and “hyb” indicates hybrids derived from F2-backcrosses), this approach produced F2-backcrosses combinations where both mating types were derived from MSA (homospecific mating type backcross) or where the mating type derives from both parents (heterospecific mating type backcross) (Fig. 1).

In preparation for the production of backcrossed hybrids, spores for each F1-hybrid diploid genotype (A1-MSLpar × A2-MSApar and A1-MSApar × A2-MSLpar) were spread on PDA for 2 days at room temperature. Haploid cells derived from meiosis of the F1-hybrids were isolated via a dilution series, as by [25]. After 2 weeks of growth, mating types of haploid cultures derived from the F1-hybrids were determined by mating type tests as by [51] with the MSL parents as tester strains. Only those cultures where mating type was confirmed by conjugation were used for further analyses (Fig. 1).

For each of the four haploid gamete types derived from the F1-hybrids (A1-MSLhyb, A2-MSAhyb, A1-MSAhyb, A2-MSLhyb; indicating the parental species of origin for the mating type chromosomes) at least 30 haploid cultures of each mating type were obtained and used for backcrossing. Depending on the number of cultures generated in the F1-hybrids, isolates with the same mating type were pooled and backcrossed to the MSA parental haploid culture of the opposite mating type (Fig. 1). Haploid cells of each isolate were suspended in sterile deionized water, isolates pooled and concentration adjusted to equal the concentration of the parental MSA isolate of opposite mating type (Additional file 3). F1-hybrid-produced-haploid cultures and parental MSA culture were mixed and used for the inoculation of 750 S. latifolia seedlings as described above. After flowering and successful infection, diploid F2 spores were collected. In order to obtain haploid isolates from the F2-backcross pathogens for genomic analyses, spores were germinated on PDA, and haploid cultures were obtained via dilution steps as indicated above [25].

Genome sequencing, mapping and assembly

For the parental haploid isolates from each fungal species, genomic DNA was isolated from yeast cultures by the method of [52]. Paired-end libraries were constructed using Nextera technology, according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and sequencing was performed using the Illumina MiSeq platform chemistry at the Genomics Service Unit of the Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, Biocenter. Reads were pre-processed using trimmomatic [53] and fastx [54]. First, adapter sequences were trimmed, and reads with more than 25% low-quality nucleotides with a Phred quality score < 30 were discarded. Reads shorter than 75 BP were discarded.

Reads from all four parental haploid genomes were mapped to the nucleic reference genome (Lamole p1A1 [22]) using the burrows-wheel-aligner (bwa) with default settings and aligned reads filtered using bam2fastq [55, 56]. For the M. lychnidis-dioicae genomes, mapping alignments were used as target for the assembly with velvet columbus 1.2.20 with k-mer values from 21 to 79 [57]. The M. silenes-acaulis genomes were assembled de novo using velvet with k-mer values from 21 to 79. Assembly quality and characteristics was observed using quast 2.3 [58].

Concerning the F1-hybrid-generation we sequenced eight haploid isolates (two isolates for each of the four genotypes A1-MSLhyb, A2-MSAhyb, A1-MSAhyb, A2-MSLhyb). From the F2-backcrosses we used two haploid isolates of the backcross type A2-MSLhyb × A1-MSApar for genomic analyses. Thus, genomic DNA from eight haploid F1-hybrids and two F2-hybrid strains was isolated, sequenced and pre-processed as indicated above.

Gene content and sequence divergence of parental genomes

To identify genes in the newly assembled MSL and MSA genomes, 7364 genes from the reference genome Lamole p1A1, were aligned to the MSL and MSA genomes using mummer 3.2.3 with the nucmer algorithm [59]. Contigs that corresponded to a reference gene sequence (> 80% identity) were extracted and trimmed according to the gene size using bedtools2.25.0 with the getfasta implement [60]. Occurrence of (partial) genes in parental genomes was counted.

Genetic distance of F1-hybrid genomes to parental genomes by electrophoretic karyotypes

We first estimated genetic distance of eight F1-hybrid individuals to parental genomes based on similarities of electrophoretic karyotypes. Therefore, each of the four parental and F1-hybrid isolates was subjected to pulsed field gel electrophoresis as by [61]. Two gels were run with a maximum of 10 samples, including all four parental samples in both gels. Gel images were analyzed using the software ImageJ [62]. A region of the image between 0.5 and 3.0 Mbp was selected across the lanes and an electropherogram (densitometry plot) was calculated. Baseline and background were subtracted, and the peak height of a single chromosome band within each karyotype was determined and used to standardize variation in brightness across lanes. Pairwise comparisons to both parental species were conducted by summing the squared differences in height at each pixel along the length of the paired electropherogram as in [61]. Values of genetic distance were standardized among gels by division by the genetic distance of parental genomes of each gel. Thus, a quotient lower than 1 indicated greater similarity than both parents to each other while a quotient higher than 1 indicated the degree of dissimilarity.

Sequencing of hybrid genomes and genetic distance to parental genomes

We estimated the genetic distance by the occurrence of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in hybrid reads. Hybrid reads were aligned to the gene sequences of both original parental genomes using bwa with default settings. Alignments with variants (including single-nucleotide-polymorphisms, insertions, deletions) were determined and filtered using vcftools with the samtools mpileup and the bcftools view implements [55, 63] and only alignments with coverage between 5 and 100 were captured. For all alignments, the number of variants was counted and overall nucleotide identity calculated.

Origin of sequences in hybrid and backcross genomes

We applied two approaches to track from which parental genomes alleles had been inherited by the hybrids. The first approach is based on a gene-independent analyses without any need of assembling the parental genomes or annotating genes. Therefore each single read is classified into one of the following categories i) derives from MSL parent, ii) derives from MSA parent, iii) derivation unknown (Additional file 5).

The second approach is based on the alignment of hybrid reads to the reference genes and the observation of variants. Therefore, gene sequences in parental genomes were used as target and hybrid reads were aligned to the gene sequences of both original parental genomes using bwa with default settings and variants determined via vcftools as indicated above. For all alignments, coverage distribution was observed and alignments with coverage too low or too high from the expected coverage were discarded. Next, we counted the number of genes that were hit and not hit in the reference gene list for both parental genomes. For each hybrid, genes were categorized into three classes; a) no alignment - if no hybrid read hit the parent gene, b) alignment without variants and c) alignment with variants. To make a decision about which parental gene is the likely original sequence, categorized gene lists from both parents were compared, and each of the hybrid 7364 genes was classified into five categories: 1) Genes, that are identical to both parents (no variants should exist in either alignment), 2) genes from MSL parent (variants in alignment for MSA but not for MSL), 3) genes from MSA parent (variants in alignment for MSL but not for MSA), 4) genes with variants to both parents, and 5) genes that were not present in the hybrids. Following this strategy, we counted MSL genes that were present in all F1 genomes and F2 genomes, respectively.

To check for a correlation between genomic content of F1-hybrids and their infection ability, we computed species-specific gene content of each hybrid genotype and tested for significant correlation (p-value threshold 0.05) with the infection ability in the F2-generation using Pearson’s correlation coefficient.

Genome structure of hybrid genomes and mitochondrial inheritance

In order to visualize the structure of the hybrid genomes, the MSL genome assembly from [21] which is composed of 23 contigs including the two mating type chromosomes a1 and a2 (contigs: A1–1, A1–2, A1–3, A2) was used as reference genome assembly. Therefore, reads from the eight F1 and two F2-hybrid genomes, were aligned to the MSL genome [21] and the MSA genome (assembly from this study) using bwa with standard parameters. For each read, genetic distance to both parents was determined from SAM files using samtools [64]. Afterwards, distance to both parents was compared and read assigned to the parent with smaller genetic distance. Next, for each position in the “original” reference, coverage depth was in reported 10 kb windows, and histograms were visualized via circos0.69 [65].

With regards to inheritance patterns of mitochondrial sequences, we also aligned hybrid reads against the mitochondrial sequences from MSL [22] and MSA (this study), reported coverage depth in 1 kb windows and included it in the visualization.

Host adaptation and functional assignment

Studies on other phytopathogenic fungi show that genes encoding for secreted proteins and carbohydrate active enzymes (CAZymes), harbor potential virulence genes and factors that interact with the host [5, 43]. Additionally, [22] showed that genes from 8 PFAM-domains, appeared to be expanded in Microbotryum lychnidis-dioicae in comparison to other plant-pathogenic fungi. Based on the gene annotation of [22], and with regard to the virulence and host specificity factors, we focused on those groups to detect genes or groups involved in host specialization. Therefore parental gene sequences corresponding to those groups were extracted and similarity between the parental species calculated and visualized via identity plots. Moreover, we observed the occurrence of the mentioned groups of genes in the hybrid genomes.

As the experimental design selects for loci that are responsible for the adaptation to M. lychnidis-dioicae, we counted MSL genes that were present in all hybrid or backcross genomes. Function of detected MSL genes was assessed by available annotations of the reference genome by [22]. For those genes where no functional description was available, genes were compared to the PHI-base 3.8 database (Pathogen-Host-Interaction: [66] using BLAST, and only hits with an E-value < 10− 5 were captured.

Availability of data and materials

Pre-processed reads and assemblies that are used for analyses during the current study were deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive database (, accession number PRJEB36154).



Microbotryum lychnidis-dioiceae


Microbotryum silenes-acaulis

A1-MSLpar/A2-MSLpar :

Haploid parental strains from MSL with mating type a1 or a2

A1-MSApar/A2-MSApar :

Haploid parental strains from MSA with mating type a1 or a2

A1-MSLpar × A2-MSApar :

Cross between the parental strains A1-MSL and A2-MSA

A1-MSApar × A2-MSLpar :

Cross between the parental strains A1-MSA and A2-MSL

A1-MSLhyb/A2-MSLhyb :

Haploid hybrid strain that derives from a cross between MSL and MSA where the mating type A1/ A2 derives from A1-MSLpar/ A2-MSLpar

A1-MSAhyb/A2-MSAhyb :

Haploid hybrid strain that derives from a cross between MSL and MSA where the mating type A1/ A2 derives from A1-MSApar/ A2-MSApar


  1. 1.

    Gladieux P, Vercken E, Fontaine MC, Hood ME, Jonot O, Couloux A, et al. Maintenance of fungal pathogen species that are specialized to different hosts: allopatric divergence and introgression through secondary contact. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28:459–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Stukenbrock EH, Christiansen FB, Hansen TT, Dutheil JY, Schierup MH. Fusion of two divergent fungal individuals led to the recent emergence of a unique widespread pathogen species. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109:10954–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Petit E, Silver C, Cornille A, Gladieux P, Rosenthal L, Bruns E, et al. Co-occurrence and hybridization of anther-smut pathogens specialized on Dianthus hosts. Mol Ecol. 2017;26:1877–90.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Samarasinghe H, Xu J. Hybrids and hybridization in the Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii species complexes. Infect Genet Evol. 2018;66:245–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lo Presti L, Lanver D, Schweizer G, Tanaka S, Liang L, Tollot M, et al. Fungal effectors and plant susceptibility. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2015;66:513–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Stukenbrock EH. Evolution, selection and isolation: a genomic view of speciation in fungal plant pathogens. New Phytol. 2013;199:895–907.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Poppe S, Dorsheimer L, Happel P, Stukenbrock EH. Rapidly evolving genes are key players in host specialization and virulence of the fungal wheat pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici (Mycosphaerella graminicola). PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1005055.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Begerow D, John B, Oberwinkler F. Evolutionary relationships among β-tubulin gene sequences of basidiomycetous fungi. Mycol Res. 2004;108:1257–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Giraldo MC, Valent B. Filamentous plant pathogen effectors in action. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013;11:800–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Dodds PN, Rathjen JP. Plant immunity: towards an integrated view of plant–pathogen interactions. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:539–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kämper J, Kahmann R, Bölker M, Ma L-J, Brefort T, Saville BJ, et al. Insights from the genome of the biotrophic fungal plant pathogen Ustilago maydis. Nature. 2006;444:97–101.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Arnold ML, Martin NH. Hybrid fitness across time and habitats. Trends Ecol Evol. 2010;25:530–6.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Stukenbrock EH. The role of hybridization in the evolution and emergence of new fungal plant pathogens. Phytopathology. 2016;106:104–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Brasier CM, Kirk SA. Rapid emergence of hybrids between the two subspecies of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi with a high level of pathogenic fitness. Plant Pathol. 2010;59:186–99.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Gibson AK, Refrégier G, Hood ME, Giraud T. Performance of a hybrid fungal pathogen on pure-species and hybrid host plants. Int J Plant Sci. 2014;175:724–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Newcombe G, Stirling B, McDonald S, Bradshaw HD. Melampsora × columbiana, a natural hybrid of M. medusae and M. occidentalis. Mycol Res. 2000;104:261–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Turner E, Jacobson DJ, Taylor JW. Genetic architecture of a reinforced, postmating, reproductive isolation barrier between Neurospora species indicates evolution via natural selection. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1002204.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kemler M, Göker M, Oberwinkler F, Begerow D. Implications of molecular characters for the phylogeny of the Microbotryaceae (Basidiomycota: Urediniomycetes). BMC Evol Biol. 2006;6:35.

  19. 19.

    Hood ME. Dimorphic mating-type chromosomes in the fungus Microbotryum violaceum. Genetics. 2002;160:457–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Schäfer AM, Kemler M, Bauer R, Begerow D. The illustrated life cycle of Microbotryum on the host plant Silene latifolia. Botany. 2010;88:875–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Badouin H, Hood ME, Gouzy J, Aguileta G, Siguenza S, Perlin MH, et al. Chaos of rearrangements in the mating-type chromosomes of the anther-smut fungus Microbotryum lychnidis-dioicae. Genetics. 2015;200:1275–84.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Perlin MH, Amselem J, Fontanillas E, Toh SS, Chen Z, Goldberg J, et al. Sex and parasites: genomic and transcriptomic analysis of Microbotryum lychnidis-dioicae, the biotrophic and plant-castrating anther smut fungus. BMC Genomics. 2015;16.

  23. 23.

    Beckerson WC, de la Vega RC R, Hartmann FE, Duhamel M, Giraud T, Perlin MH. Cause and effectors: whole-genome comparisons reveal shared but rapidly evolving effector sets among host-specific plant-castrating fungi. mBio. 2019;10.

  24. 24.

    Sloan DB, Giraud T, Hood ME. Maximized virulence in a sterilizing pathogen: the anther-smut fungus and its co-evolved hosts. J Evol Biol. 2008;21:1544–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    De Vienne DM, RefréGier G, Hood ME, Guigue A, Devier B, Vercken E, et al. Hybrid sterility and inviability in the parasitic fungal species complex Microbotryum. J Evol Biol. 2009;22:683–98.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Le Gac M, Hood ME, Giraud T. Evolution of reproductive isolation within a parasitic fungal species complex. Evolution. 2007;61:1781–7.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Büker B, Petit E, Begerow D, Hood ME. Experimental hybridization and backcrossing reveal forces of reproductive isolation in Microbotryum. BMC Evol Biol. 2013;13:224.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Yakimowski SB, Rieseberg LH. The role of homoploid hybridization in evolution: a century of studies synthesizing genetics and ecology. Am J Bot. 2014;101:1247–58.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Kohn LM. Mechanisms of fungal speciation. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2005;43:279–308.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Dettman JR, Sirjusingh C, Kohn LM, Anderson JB. Incipient speciation by divergent adaptation and antagonistic epistasis in yeast. Nature. 2007;447:585–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Wickes BL, Mayorga ME, Edman U, Edman JC. Dimorphism and haploid fruiting in Cryptococcus neoformans: association with the alpha-mating type. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1996;93:7327–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kahmann R, Kämper J. Ustilago maydis: how its biology relates to pathogenic development: Tansley review. New Phytol. 2004;164:31–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Mallet J. Hybridization as an invasion of the genome. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005;20:229–37.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Wilch G, Ward S, Castle A. Transmission of mitochondrial DNA in Ustilago violacea. Curr Genet. 1992;22:135–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Sun S, Fu C, Ianiri G, Heitman J. The Pheromone and Pheromone Receptor Mating-Type Locus Is Involved in Controlling Uniparental Mitochondrial Inheritance in Cryptococcus. bioRxiv. 2019.

  36. 36.

    Fedler M, Luh K-S, Stelter K, Nieto-Jacobo F, Basse CW. The a2 mating-type locus genes lga2 and rga2 direct uniparental mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) inheritance and constrain mtDNA recombination during sexual development of Ustilago maydis. Genetics. 2009;181:847–60.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Duplessis S, Cuomo CA, Lin Y-C, Aerts A, Tisserant E, Veneault-Fourrey C, et al. Obligate biotrophy features unraveled by the genomic analysis of rust fungi. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108:9166–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Gladieux P, Ropars J, Badouin H, Branca A, Aguileta G, de Vienne DM, et al. Fungal evolutionary genomics provides insight into the mechanisms of adaptive divergence in eukaryotes. Mol Ecol. 2014;23:753–73.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Voigt CA, Schäfer W, Salomon S. A secreted lipase of Fusarium graminearum is a virulence factor required for infection of cereals: lipase as a virulence factor. Plant J. 2005;42:364–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Blümke A, Somerville SC, Voigt CA. Transient expression of the Arabidopsis thaliana callose synthase PMR4 increases penetration resistance to powdery mildew in barley. Adv Biosci Biotechnol. 2013;04:810–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Saier MH, Beatty JT, Goffeau A, Harley KT, Heijne WH, Huang SC, et al. The major facilitator superfamily. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 1999;1:257–79.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Badouin H, Gladieux P, Gouzy J, Siguenza S, Aguileta G, Snirc A, et al. Widespread selective sweeps throughout the genome of model plant pathogenic fungi and identification of effector candidates. Mol Ecol. 2017;26:2041–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Lyu X, Shen C, Fu Y, Xie J, Jiang D, Li G, et al. Comparative genomic and transcriptional analyses of the carbohydrate-active enzymes and secretomes of phytopathogenic fungi reveal their significant roles during infection and development. Sci Rep. 2015;5:15565.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Hood ME, Antonovics J, Koskella B. Shared forces of sex chromosome evolution in haploid-mating and diploid-mating organisms: Microbotryum violaceum and other model organisms. Genetics. 2004;168:141–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Petit E, Giraud T, de Vienne DM, Coelho MA, Aguileta G, Amselem J, et al. Linkage to the mating-type locus across the genus Microbotryum: insights into non- recombining chromosomes. Evolution. 2012;66:3519–33.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Jones V, Richards PW. Silene acaulis (L.) Jacq. The. J Ecol. 1962;50:475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Murashige T, Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant. 1962;15:473–97.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Hood ME, Antonovics J. Mating within the meiotic tetrad and the maintenance of genomic heterozygosity. Genetics. 2004;166:1751–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Devier B, Aguileta G, Hood ME, Giraud T. Using phylogenies of pheromone receptor genes in the Microbotryum violaceum species complex to investigate possible speciation by hybridization. Mycologia. 2009;102:689–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Hood ME. Dynamics of multiple infection and within-host competition by the anther-smut pathogen. Am Nat. 2003;162:122–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Hood ME, Scott M, Hwang M. Breaking linkage between mating compatibility factors: Tetrapolarity in Microbotryum. Evolution. 2015;69:2561–72.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Hoffman CS, Winston F. A ten-minute DNA preparation from yeast efficiently releases autonomous plasmids for transformation of Escherichia coli. Gene. 1987;57:267–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Patel RK, Jain M. NGS QC toolkit: a toolkit for quality control of next generation sequencing data. PLoS One. 2012;7:e30619.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with burrows-wheeler transform. Bioinforma Oxf Engl. 2010;26:589–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Tischler G, Leonard S. Biobambam: tools for read pair collation based algorithms on BAM files. Source Code Biol Med. 2014;9:13.

    PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Zerbino DR, Birney E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008;18:821–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:1072–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Kurtz S, Phillippy A, Delcher AL, Smoot M, Shumway M, Antonescu C, et al. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol. 2004;5:R12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:841–2.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Hood ME, Antonovics J, Heishman H. Karyotypic similarity identifies multiple host-shifts of a pathogenic fungus in natural populations. Infect Genet Evol. 2003;2:167–72.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:671–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, DePristo MA, et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:2156–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinforma Oxf Engl. 2009;25:2078–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Krzywinski M, Schein J, Birol I, Connors J, Gascoyne R, Horsman D, et al. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009;19:1639–45.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Winnenburg R, Urban M, Beacham A, Baldwin TK, Holland S, Lindeberg M, et al. PHI-base update: additions to the pathogen host interaction database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;36:Database:D572–6.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Phyl Christal for help in the greenhouse and Antoine Branco for help with the circos analyses. We also thank the reviewers for the critical discussion and ideas about variation in the life cycle.


The crossing and greenhouse experiments have been funded by the NIH (R15GM119092). Genomic analyses and sequencing have been funded by the DFG (DFG BE2201/7–1, BE2201/23–1). BB acknowledges a grant from the DAAD program “Jahresstipendium für Doktoranden” (German Academic Exchange Service) supporting a research stay abroad.

Author information




DB, BB and MEH designed the experimental set up. BB performed greenhouse and crossing experiments. AB performed the sequencing of the parental and hybrid genomes. BB genotyped the data and performed genomic analyses. SR wrote the script for the analyses of the global hybrid data set. MAG contributed to the analyses of the data. BB wrote the main part of the manuscript with the help of MAG and MEH. DB supervised the whole project. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Britta Bueker.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

Diagram (.pdf) representing the infection ability of hybrids in dependence on the genotype. Correlation between proportion of species-specific genes in haploid F1-hybrid genomes and their infection ability after backrossing to M. silenes-acaulis.

Additional file 2.

Text file (.docx) listing the genes that are present in all infectious hybrid genomes. M. lychndidis-dioicae genes from the reference genome Lamole p1A1 that are present in all infectious F1-hybrids and F2-backcrosses.

Additional file 3.

Text file (.docx) listing the used inoculum. Haploid F1-strains used for inoculum.

Additional file 4.

Gel picture (.pdf) showing the karyotypes of four F1-hybrids and parental strains. Electrophoretic karyotypes for Microbotryum silenes-dioicae and M. silenes-acaulis and F1-hybrids resulting from crosses between the two species.

Additional file 5.

Text file (.docx) containing the script for the “global approach”. Detailed script for tracking the origin of reads in hybrids.

Additional file 6.

Diagram (.pdf) representing coverage histogram for the “global approach”. Example for a coverage histogram from which sequencing coverage c and the optimal threshold C* was inferred.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bueker, B., Guerreiro, M.A., Hood, M.E. et al. Meiotic recombination in the offspring of Microbotryum hybrids and its impact on pathogenicity. BMC Evol Biol 20, 123 (2020).

Download citation


  • Experimental selection
  • Host-pathogen interaction
  • Hybrid speciation
  • Backcrossing
  • Host specialization
  • Effectors