Skip to main content

Table 2 Confidence of phylogenetic tree selection using the Approximately Unbiased and Shimodaira-Hasegawa tests

From: A curious coincidence: mosquito biodiversity and the limits of the Japanese encephalitis virus in Australasia

  

Subset 1

Subset 2

Subset 3

Tree constraint

No.

Obs.

AU-test

SH-test

Obs.

AU-test

SH-test

Obs.

AU-test

SH-test

Unconstrained

best

-0.7

0.805

0.958

-1.4

0.887

0.974

-1.3

0.950

0.969

(pal N-AUS, pal S-AUS)

I

2.2

0.145

0.721

1.7

0.199

0.646

2.2

0.329

0.682

(pal N-AUS, pal PNG)

II

1.4

0.440

0.723

1.4

0.411

0.668

2.2

0.331

0.682

(ann S-AUS, ann AUS)

III

14.1

0.013*

0.043*

13.1

0.003*

0.035*

10.7

0.074

0.103

(ann PNG-1, ann PNG-2)

IV

17.9

0.003*

0.027*

14.7

0.002*

0.029*

11.9

0.030*

0.064

[(pal†, ann) ann SI]

V

0.7

0.526

0.831

2.1

0.220

0.668

1.3

0.131

0.758

(pal†, ann SI)

VI

3.2

0.104

0.547

2.2

0.210

0.595

2.2

0.330

0.593

[ann SI,(ann*)]

VII

2.4

0.224

0.637

1.5

0.317

0.717

1.4

0.269

0.696

  1. Approximately Unbiased (AU) and Shimodaira-Hasegawa (SH) tests performed using CONSEL 0.1h. Obs. – test statistics; * P-value < 0.05, suggests that the constraints are significantly different – rejected; pal† – pal PNG, pal N-AUS, pal S-AUS; ann – ann S-AUS, ann PNG-1, ann PNG-2, ann AUS. Abbreviations: ann – Culex annulirostris, pal – Culex palpalis; for lineage description refer to Figure 2 and 4.
Back to article page

BMC Ecology and Evolution

ISSN: 2730-7182

Contact us