Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 Z-scores of the robustness γ 1 m MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacPC6xNi=xH8viVGI8Gi=hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0xb9qqpG0dXdb9aspeI8k8fiI+fsY=rqGqVepae9pg0db9vqaiVgFr0xfr=xfr=xc9adbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaaeqabiWaaaGcbaacciGae83SdC2aa0baaSqaaiabigdaXaqaaiabd2gaTbaaaaa@3001@ at threshold level T1. Rates for each real pre-miRNA compared to 1,000 random and four types of shuffled pseudo pre-miRNAs.

From: In silico genetic robustness analysis of microRNA secondary structures: potential evidence of congruent evolution in microRNA

Species Random Zero-markov Mononucleotide First-markov Dinucleotide
H. sapiens -2.11 ± 0.62 -2.14 ± 0.61 -2.14 ± 0.61 -2.17 ± 0.61 -2.17 ± 0.62
C. elegans -2.18 ± 0.89 -2.17 ± 0.86 -2.16 ± 0.86 -2.20 ± 0.87 -2.18 ± 0.84
D. melanogaster -2.14 ± 0.74 -2.11 ± 0.71 -2.07 ± 0.80 -2.15 ± 0.72 -2.15 ± 0.72
D. rerio -2.07 ± 0.61 -2.11 ± 0.56 -2.13 ± 0.67 -2.13 ± 0.56 -2.11 ± 0.55
M. musculus -1.96 ± 0.77 -2.00 ± 0.74 -2.00 ± 0.75 -2.04 ± 0.75 -2.02 ± 0.73
R. norvegicus -2.02 ± 0.75 -2.07 ± 0.73 -2.08 ± 0.73 -2.09 ± 0.73 -2.07 ± 0.72
Average -2.07 ± 0.70 -2.10 ± 0.67 -2.10 ± 0.68 -2.13 ± 0.67 -2.11 ± 0.66