Evolutionary history of the endangered fish Zoogoneticus quitzeoensis(Bean, 1898) (Cyprinodontiformes: Goodeidae) using a sequential approach to phylogeography based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA data

Table 1 Measures of mitochondrial DNA diversity observed for the two lineages and other clades identified in this study.

Biogeographic region	Population	N	Hn	S	H_d± SD	π ± SD	k
Lineage I		45	40	76	0.991 ± 0.008	0.0067 ± 0.0036	7.63 ± 3.73
Ameca River	Magdalena	6	5	6	0.933 ± 0.122	0.0017 ± 0.0013	2.00 ± 1.30
	Moloya	5	5	6	1.0 ± 0.126	0.0024 ± 0.0018	2.8 ± 1.77
	Veneros	9	9	19	1.0 ± 0.0524	0.0049 ± 0.0029	5.64 ± 2.98
	All populations	20	18	31	0.984 ± 0.018	0.0032 ± 0.0028	3.64 ± 1.39
Chapala Lake	La Alberca	7	7	16	1.00 ± 0.076	0.0044 ± 0.0028	4.97 ± 2.75
Lower Lerma River	La Platanera	5	5	8	1.00 ± 0.126	0.0028 ± 0.0020	3.21 ± 1.98
	La Luz	7	4	6	0.714 ± 0.181	0.0015 ± 0.0011	1.71 ± 1.13
	Orandino	6	6	13	1.00 ± 0.0962	0.0039 ± 0.0026	4.55 ± 2.60
	All populations	18	15	29	0.961 ± 0.039	0.0044 ± 0.0028	5.07 ± 1.37
Lineage II		35	25	54	0.946 ± 0.025	0.0061 ± 0.0033	6.97 ± 3.46
Middle Lerma River	San Francisco del Rincón	7	5	10	0.857 ± 0.137	0.0028 ± 0.0019	3.25 ± 1.90
Cuitzeo Lake	Belisario	6	6	13	0.714 ± 0.181	0.0049 ± 0.0032	5.69 ± 3.18
	San Cristóbal	7	4	9	1.00 ± 0.0764	0.0022 ± 0.0015	2.58 ± 1.56
	La Mintzita	6	5	9	0.936 ± 0.122	0.0032 ± 0.0022	3.75 ± 2.19
	All populations	19	14	27	0.936 ± 0.047	0.0039 ± 0.0024	4.52 ± 1.654
Zacapu Lake	Zacapu	9	7	9	0.917 ± 0.092	0.0017 ± 0.0012	2.00 ± 1.24
	Total	80	65	139	0.987 ± 0.007	0.0172 ± 0.0067	19.79 ± 1.96

N = sample size, Hn = number of haplotypes, S = number of polymorphic sites, H_d= gene diversity, π = nucleotide diversity (Nei 1987), k = mean pairwise nucleotide diversity (Tajima 1993)

ISSN: 2730-7182