Sister group hypothesis | Morphology | 16S rRNA | Cyt c ox. Sub I | 18S rRNA | 28S rRNA | Combined Molecules | Total evidence |
Clade I | - | - | - | + | - | 1 | + |
Clade II | - | - | + | - | - | + | 2 |
Clade III | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 2 |
Clade IV | - | - | + | na | na | + | + |
- As discussed in the text, only the Bayesian MOR and MOLMOR analyses showed significant congruence. We tabulate the shared clades (see text for clade membership), and indicate the instances where the combined evidence parsimony analyses agree.
- na = not applicable because one or more taxa is not represented in this partition
- + = supports this clade
- - = conflicts with this clade
- 1 = also in parsimony MOL analysis
- 2 = also in parsimony MOLMOR analysis