Islands beneath islands: phylogeography of a groundwater amphipod crustacean in the Balearic archipelago
© Bauzà-Ribot et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 22 March 2011
Accepted: 26 July 2011
Published: 26 July 2011
Metacrangonyctidae (Amphipoda, Crustacea) is an enigmatic continental subterranean water family of marine origin (thalassoid). One of the species in the genus, Metacrangonyx longipes, is endemic to the Balearic islands of Mallorca and Menorca (W Mediterranean). It has been suggested that the origin and distribution of thalassoid crustaceans could be explained by one of two alternative hypotheses: (1) active colonization of inland freshwater aquifers by a marine ancestor, followed by an adaptative shift; or (2) passive colonization by stranding of ancestral marine populations in coastal aquifers during marine regressions. A comparison of phylogenies, phylogeographic patterns and age estimations of clades should discriminate in favour of one of these two proposals.
Phylogenetic relationships within M. longipes based on three mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and one nuclear marker revealed five genetically divergent and geographically structured clades. Analyses of cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) mtDNA data showed the occurrence of a high geographic population subdivision in both islands, with current gene flow occurring exclusively between sites located in close proximity. Molecular-clock estimations dated the origin of M. longipes previous to about 6 Ma, whereas major cladogenetic events within the species took place between 4.2 and 2.0 Ma.
M. longipes displayed a surprisingly old and highly fragmented population structure, with major episodes of cladogenesis within the species roughly correlating with some of the major marine transgression-regression episodes that affected the region during the last 6 Ma. Eustatic changes (vicariant events) -not active range expansion of marine littoral ancestors colonizing desalinated habitats-explain the phylogeographic pattern observed in M. longipes.
Subterranean fauna provides unique opportunities for the study of evolutionary mechanisms and speciation processes . In recent years, phylogeographic analyses have revealed unprecedented cases of cryptic speciation, restricted distribution and presumed sympatric speciation among different cave-dwelling animal groups . Nevertheless, the occurrence of extensive morphological conservatism in subterranean fauna frequently hampers the establishment of phylogenetic inferences based solely on morphological features. In this context, homoplasy arises from common exposure to the particular selective pressures inherent to cave life (i.e., darkness and oligotrophy) or from the lack of directional selection [3, 4]. Conversely, isolation in caves can lead these morphologically undifferentiated subterranean organisms to display high levels of genetic divergence [4–6].
Geological and hydrological processes, in particular shifts in water tables, can lead to the isolation or connection of aquifers, with consequent effects on gene flow between populations of subterranean aquatic organisms . In the same way, marine regressions are suggested to have played a major role in the isolation of many marine relicts in continental groundwaters [7–10]. Recent molecular phylogenetic and phylogeographic studies on subterranean amphipods emphasize the role played by historical factors (i.e., glacial or drought episodes) in the pattern of genetic diversification and distribution displayed by these animals [5, 6, 11]. Likewise,  considered the influence of contingency, i.e., whether the colonization event involved a single localized surface ancestor or multiple, geographically separated ancestors, on the shaping of these patterns. In addition, larval life history traits, such as feeding mode (planktotrophic vs. lecithotrophic) can play a determinant role in crustacean distribution, as they control the duration of the dispersive phase [13, 14]. However, stygobiont amphipods have a comparatively reduced dispersal potential (as do all peracarid crustaceans), as the females carry offspring in a marsupium and these are brooded and not released into the water column until metamorphosed into diminutive non-natatory adults .
Among the obligate dwellers of subterranean waters (stygobionts), a high number belong to so-called thalassoid lineages, organisms that are derived directly from marine ancestors . Thalassoid forms are known to occur among a vast array of faunistic groups, especially the Crustacea [16, 8]. The ancestors of thalassoid animals presumably inhabited marine transitional habitats, such as submarine fissures, mixohaline submarine karstic springs or the interstitial medium developed in sandy and gravelly coastal sediments, where sharp variations in salinity (i.e., periodical exposure to desalinated waters) and other environmental conditions mimic, in some way, those found in fresh groundwaters . Colonization of inland freshwater aquifers by this preadapted marine fauna might have proceeded as a natural extension of their primary niche, followed by an adaptive shift; this process would be independent of the occurrence of environmental constraints, such as episodes of glaciation, drought or marine regression [17, 18]. This hypothesis provides a plausible explanation for the origin of some freshwater stygobiont ostracods closely related to marine euryhaline taxa . However, most faunistic and biogeographic evidence favours an alternative vicariant scenario by which colonization occurs passively via stranding of ancestral populations during episodes of marine regression [7–10]. Accordingly, sea withdrawal or tectonic uplift at different geological periods could have led to the gradual isolation of populations of ancestral marine taxa in inland groundwaters, triggering their ulterior diversification and speciation. This hypothesis explains satisfactorily the distribution of many stygobiont crustaceans and is testable by collating a phylogenetic framework and molecular-clock-age estimates of relevant clades, with their respective geographic distributions [2, 20].
Here, we studied the phylogeography of Metacrangonyx longipes Chevreux, 1909, a euryhaline stygobiont amphipod crustacean that is endemic to Mallorca and Menorca (Balearic Islands; W Mediterranean). On Mallorca, it occurs in various types of groundwater habitats, from coastal anchialine caves (sensu ) of raised salinity to freshwater inland wells, caves and springs. On Menorca, the species is restricted to coastal anchialine caves and wells and is absent from fresh inland groundwaters. On both islands, the species is limited to lowlands and is absent in apparently suitable habitats located at elevations higher than 125 m above sea level. The Metacrangonyctidae is a strictly inland water subterranean family with no close relatives; however, several lines of evidence strongly suggest its marine origin: (1) its members are known only from continental regions that were covered by ancient epicontinental seas [22, 23]; and (2) several species still maintain ties with the marine environment (i.e., they live in anchialine wells and caves in coastal areas; ).
In this study, we used the sequences of three mitochondrial and one nuclear gene of M. longipes and of several congeneric species to perform a phylogenetic analysis of the species and infer population divergence times. Moreover, we use sequences of the cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 gene from a more comprehensive data set to perform a phylogeographic analysis and to examine the population structure of this taxon. Given the manifested euryhalinity of M. longipes and the absence of any appreciable morphological differentiation between its populations on the two islands, our initial prediction was that the species could have dispersed across the groundwater environment of the islands using the virtually continuous peripheral coastal anchialine pathway, from which it could have colonized inland freshwater habitats recurrently. If this was the case, we could expect a pattern of considerable gene flow and shallow genetic divergences within each island, with genetic signatures of inland populations deriving from coastal ones. However, our study revealed that this amphipod displays a remarkably ancient and highly fragmented population structure, with episodes of cladogenesis that could be related to major sea-level changes that affected the islands during the last 6 Ma.
Phylogenetic analyses and genetic distances
Summary of cox1 MtDNA population statistics
Hap. Diversity ± SD
Nuc. Diversity (π ) × 102 ± SD
H17 (3), H18 (2), H20 (1)
0.733 ± 0.155
0.480 ± 0.334
H11 (1), H12 (2), H13 (1)
0.833 ± 0.222
0.235 ± 0.210
H2 (15), H3 (4)
0.351 ± 0.111
0.055 ± 0.063
H43 (1), H44 (1), H45 (2)
0.833 ± 0.222
0.157 ± 0.155
0.000 ± 0.000
0.000 ± 0.000
H6 (1), H9 (1)
1.000 ± 0.500
0.313 ± 0.383
H41 (7), H42 (1)
0.250 ± 0.180
0.039 ± 0.056
H25 (10), H26 (2)
0.303 ± 0.148
0.047 ± 0.059
H37 (8), H38 (4) H39 (2)
0.615 ± 0.102
0.110 ± 0.099
H27 (1), H29 (1), H33 (1)
1.000 ± 0.272
0.417 ± 0.375
H27 (2), H32 (1)
0.667 ± 0.314
0.313 ± 0.295
H27 (1), H29 (1), H50 (1)
1.000 ± 0.272
0.313 ± 0.295
H27 (2), H28 (1), H29 (2), H48 (2)
0.857 ± 0.102
0.283 ± 0.212
H14 (4), H15 (1)
0.400 ± 0.237
0.063 ± 0.080
0.000 ± 0.000
0.000 ± 0.000
0.000 ± 0.000
0.000 ± 0.000
0.000 ± 0.000
0.000 ± 0.000
0.000 ± 0.000
0.000 ± 0.000
H4 (1), H5 (20), H8 (1), H46 (1)
0.249 ± 0.117
0.245 ± 0.169
H7 (3), H10 (1)
0.500 ± 0.265
0.391 ± 0.315
H22 (4), H23 (1), H36 (1)
0.600 ± 0.215
1.701 ± 1.043
0.000 ± 0.000
0.000 ± 0.000
Cox1 uncorrected distances between collection sites ranged from a minimum of 0.5% between those located close to each other (viz., 18 and 28, only 3.5 km apart) to a maximum of 8.9% (corrected to 9.8% using a GTR model) between populations from the two islands (viz., localities 4 and 20, separated by 68 km) or between some Mallorcan populations. As deduced from the phylogenetic analyses, clade A was the most divergent (7.8-8% mean uncorrected genetic distance with respect to the remaining clades), whereas the distance between the other clades fell between 6.3-7.5%. The distance between subclades B1 and B2 averaged 5.5%.
Population genetic structure and genetic diversity
Fifty different cox1 haplotypes were identified in the sampled specimens from the 31 populations analysed (EMBL accession numbers FR729731-FR729892) (Table 1). Four haplotypes were shared between neighbouring populations: haplotypes H27 and H29 in several central Mallorcan localities (Montuïri/Ruberts; stations 10, 14 and 19), whereas haplotypes H19 and H22 were present in two Sineu wells (stations 22 and 23). Table 1 summarizes the standard intra-population diversity estimated for cox1. Six populations included only one haplotype (h = 0), although in three of them only two specimens (the only ones collected) were analysed. In sharp contrast, three populations showed maximum diversity indices, as every individual bore a different haplotype (h = 1). The rest of populations attained low-to-moderate h values, in the range of 0.25-0.86. Diversity was much lower in the two Menorcan populations (three haplotypes per 28 individuals) compared with the Mallorcan populations (47 haplotypes per 144 individuals). Nucleotide diversity (mean number of pair-wise differences π) were low at most locations (π < 0.5%); population 28 alone exhibited a π value > 1% because of the presence of an individual bearing a divergent haplotype. Neutrality tests were non-significant in all cases, with the exception of populations 7 (Fu's Fs = -0.182, P < 0.05) and 8 (Ramos-Onsins and Rozas R2 = 0.51, P < 0.01).
The Mantel test revealed a moderately significant correlation (r = 0.467, P < 0.001) between genetic and geographic distances. In addition, cox1 pair-wise population F ST values were generally high (F ST = 0.5-0.99) and highly significant, with the exception of between neighbouring populations (viz., 19 vs. 10-15, 24 vs. 28). Accordingly, SAMOVA showed that the optimum number of population groups necessary to maximize F CT values was K = 19-20 (F CT = 0.961-0.963), whereas the corresponding F SC values were the lowest in the K series tested, as expected . This structure grouped wells 10-15 and 19 into a single population, whereas wells at Campanet (6) and Pollença (16) on one side, and wells at Vilafranca (28-31) and Cala Sant Vicenç (26, 27) on the other, formed three different populations. Most sites harbouring the same population were less than 2 km apart, with the exception of sites 10 and 19, which were separated by about 10 km. The remaining sites each represented a single, distinct population group, suggesting the occurrence of a high population subdivision with gene flow occurring exclusively among wells located less than 10 km apart. The occurrence of an alternative geographical structuring that yielded higher K values was explored using AMOVA, as this method allows recognition of population groups with any number of K. This analysis yielded a similar geographical setting, but identified wells 16, 19 and 26 as different populations; AMOVA showed that F CT values reached a plateau at 0.96 at K = 19-27, with the highest value attained at K = 23.
Estimation of coalescence time
Estimation of coalescence times
Arthropod fixed 2.3%
Arthropod fixed 2.3%
The thalassoid condition of Metacrangonyx longipes is supported in our study as we can deduce at least three independent episodes of colonization of fresh inland groundwaters from primary anchialine, brackish water ancestors. M. longipes populations appeared split into five deep genetic lineages devoid of any relevant morphological differentiation. Gene flow between populations did not exceed 10 km and was frequently limited to occur in a radius of less than 2 km. Therefore, our results do not support an active colonization of fresh inland groundwater habitats by expansive crevicular/interstitial marine littoral ancestors (although past episodes of dispersal during favourable conditions can not be ruled out completely) [17–19]. If that was the case, we should have found evidence of substantial connectivity between the populations of M. longipes established far inland in completely fresh waters and those of the coastal anchialine medium, and among anchialine population themselves.
In a study on hyalid and crangonyctoid stygobiont amphipods from W Australian calcrete aquifers, Cooper et al.  showed that the major mitochondrial cox1 lineages were restricted to a single isolated calcrete, whereas most of the genetic variation occurred between calcretes. Although some populations from neighbouring calcretes placed in the same palaeodrainage channel are genetically similar (suggesting the occurrence of gene flow in the past), populations do not appear necessarily clustered according to palaeodrainage channel. This pattern could result from the occurrence of gene flow or range expansion between palaeodrainages in the past, before populations became isolated in particular calcretes. The ulterior isolation of populations could be associated with a major period of aridification that affected the region between 10 and 4 Ma .
Major cladogenetic events in M. longipes can be related to the succession of past sea-level changes in the Mediterranean (with the caveat of the limitations and errors associated with molecular-clock estimations). During the Tortonian (11.3 Ma), Mallorca and Menorca were invaded by an epicontinental sea that reduced the former to a cluster of small islands roughly corresponding to its current uplands, whereas the southern half of Menorca was probably completely submerged (see Figure 1) . We assume that a single M. longipes population was then distributed along the entire continental shelf of the archipelago. This ancestral population overcame the phase of deposition of evaporites of the so-called "Messinian Salinity Crisis", which was dated precisely at 5.96-5.59 Ma  and was coeval with a generalized marine regression episode that could have dried up the Mediterranean completely at that epoch. This mega-regression was probably the ultimate cause of the split of the species into two major lineages: the former clade A, corresponding to the population that remained associated and followed the receded sea coastline towards the SE; and the remaining clades, which were presumably derived from the portion of the population that followed the receded coastline towards the N (see Figure 1). The age of the most recent common ancestor of clade A and its sister group (the remaining populations) has been estimated in our analyses at ca. 5.4-6.2 Ma using a relaxed molecular clock based on cox1 sequences and a coalescent model.
Sometime between 4.2 and 2.7 Ma (upper-middle Pliocene; Figure 3), the populations from Menorca (node D), the Mallorcan central zone (node B), N Mallorca (node E) and W Mallorca (node C) became separated. The corresponding cladogenetic events might be linked to a single major marine transgression-regression cycle, such as that triggered by the upper Pliocene refulfilment of the depressed basins in the W Mediterranean area. The upper Pliocene transgression, which took place immediately after the Salinity Crisis, probably reached ca. +100 m above the current sea level in the Balearic area . This might have enabled the species to reach the current central zone of Mallorca (Figure 1). More recently, our phylogeny shows that at the beginning of the late Pliocene, clades B, D and E experienced further splits that were followed by a differentiation of populations, with major secondary bifurcations occurring between 2.0 and 0.5 Ma. The uncertainties and large stochastic errors associated with the molecular clock estimations preclude the correlation of the tree node ages with the datings of particular geological and climate transitional episodes. However, it is remarkable that the obtained tree topology is in agreement with the documented chronological succession of changes in the late Pliocene to mid-Pleistocene sea-level record in the North Hemisphere [30–32]. We suggest that recent cladogenetic events in M. longipes can be linked to two major cooling events roughly dated back at 2.5 to 3 and 1.2 to 0.85 Ma, respectively.
Our data suggest that marine transgression-regression cycles (eustatic changes) may have induced the repeated range expansion, contraction and fragmentation of populations of M. longipes, which appears currently split into several isolated and genetically divergent lineages adapted to a broad spectrum of salinity conditions. This scenario could explain the difficulty in resolving the phylogenetic relationships among different lineages of this amphipod, regardless of the method or sequence data set used: the rapid isolation and almost synchronous diversification of peripheral populations of the same ancestor in inland aquifers may have led to this situation. This hypothesis has been proposed to account for the distribution of particular anchialine and fresh groundwater taxa at various taxonomic levels and at larger geographical scales . Our study stressed the importance of changes in sea level as a cause of deep intra-specific genetic divergence in thalassoid subterranean amphipods, a pattern that was apparently not accompanied by remarkable morphological differentiation .
One hundred and sixty-two specimens of M. longipes were collected from seven anchialine and one freshwater cave, and from 23 freshwater wells spanning the entire geographic range of the species (Figure 2), using a modified Cvetkov net  and hand-held plankton nets. Individuals were preserved in 95% ethanol in the field and conserved at -20°C for subsequent molecular analyses. The sampling locations (with their geographical coordinates) and the number of individuals analysed for three mitochondrial and one nuclear marker are reported in Additional file 1. Three congeneric species were used as out-groups: the Moroccan Metacrangonyx sp. and M. remyi Balazuc & Ruffo, 1953 were collected in a well at Tamri (the coast of Agadir) and at the type locality located 1280 m above sea-level in the High Atlas, respectively. M. ilvanus Stoch, 1997 was collected in a well at Elba Island (Italy).
Genomic DNA was isolated from whole specimens using the DNeasy Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer's recommendations. PCR was used to amplify a fragment of ~650 bp of the mitochondrial cox1 gene using the primers described in  or, in some cases, using the specific primers metacoxF2 (5'- GAACTTAGATACCCWGGTAATTTGATYGG-3') and metacoxR2 (5'- TCAGTTAATAAYATAGTAATAGCYCC-3'). Fragments of three other genes were also amplified in a subset of 34 individuals: 400 bp of the 16S rRNA (rrnL) gene were amplified using the specific primers 16SmetaF (5'- RGTATTTTGACCGTGCTAAGG-3') and 16SmetaR (5'- TGTAAAAATTAAARGTTGAACAAAC-3'), 360 bp of the cytochrome b (cob) gene were amplified using the primers described in , and 325 bp of the nuclear gene Histone H3A were amplified using the primers from . EMBL accession numbers for the M. longipes individuals and outgroup species for rrnL, cob and Histone H3A are FR846024-FR846060, FR846061-FR846096 and FR846097-FR846133, respectively.
PCR was performed on a PTC-100 thermocycler (MJ Research) using a reaction volume of 25 μl and amplification conditions consisted of one cycle at 94°C for 2 min and 40 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 47-55°C for 30 s and 72°C for 1 min, followed by a final incubation step at 72°C for 10 min. Amplified products were purified with Invitek columns (Invitek GMBH, Berlin, Germany), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The fragments were sequenced in both directions using the ABI Prism BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction kit v. 2.0 and electrophoresed and detected on an ABI 3100 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Alignments were performed using MAFFT http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/mafft/index.html, with default parameters.
Partition Bremer Support values were estimated using TreeRot v. 3  and PAUP 4.0b10 . Phylogenetic Bayesian analyses were conducted using MrBayes v. 3.1.2 . We selected the model that fit the data best for each partition in the jModelTest  using the Bayesian information criterion. Models were tested for each of the three codon positions. The HKY+I model was selected for the first and second positions, and the GTR+G model for the third position in the case of the mitochondrial-protein-coding genes, whereas the HKY+I and F81+I models were used for rrnL and Histone H3A, respectively. Competing partition strategies were compared using Bayesian Information Criterion . In the combined mitochondrial and nuclear data set, four partitions were favoured (first + second codon positions of cox1 and cob, third codon positions of cox1 and cob, rrnL and Histone H3A as separate partitions), whereas two partitions were selected in the case of cox1-only data sets (first + second vs third codon positions). Two independent runs were performed for each Bayesian search with default prior values, random trees and three heated and one cold Markov chains running for five million generations and sampled at intervals of 1000 generations. All parameters were unlinked and rates were allowed to vary freely over partitions. The burn-in and convergence of runs were assessed by examining the plot of generations against likelihood scores using the sump command in MrBayes. The convergence of all parameters in the two independent runs was also assessed using the Tracer program, v. 1.4 . Trees resulting from the two independent runs (once burn-in samples were discarded) were combined in a single majority consensus topology using the sumt command in MrBayes, and the frequencies of the nodes in a majority rule tree were taken as a posteriori probabilities . Maximum likelihood analyses using the above-mentioned partition schemes were performed using RAxML v. 7.0.4 implementing a fast bootstrapping algorithm . Finally, we used Mesquite v. 2.74  to reconstruct the M. longipes habitat character state at ancestral nodes (inland fresh vs. brackish groundwaters) using parsimony. In this analysis, we used the cox1 phylogenetic tree (as it represents a full population sampling) and the observed habitat distribution among populations to minimize the number of steps of habitat change.
A Mantel test was performed on genetic (cox1) and geographic distances of populations using the ZT program , to check for the occurrence of isolation by distance. Population diversity indices for the cox1 data set, such as number of haplotypes, haplotype and nucleotide diversity, and pair-wise F ST distances and their significance based on 10,000 permutations were obtained using ARLEQUIN v. 3.01  Populations represented by only one sequenced individual were excluded from the analyses. SAMOVA v. 1.0  was used to identify geographical groupings that maximized genetic variance between groups of populations (F SC ). The method calculates F statistics (F SC , F ST and F CT ) using AMOVA  and identifies the optimum number of population groups for a set of sampled populations given a geographic distribution. We used 100 simulated annealing processes for each value of K from K = 2 to K = 20. Neutrality tests were performed for individual populations calculating Fu's F S  and the parameter R 2  using ARLEQUIN v. 3.01 and DnaSP v. 5.10.1 , respectively, with the latter assuming no recombination and 10,000 replicates. Simulations have shown that R 2 and F S are better at detecting population growth compared with other tests, the former being superior for small sample sizes .
Estimation of divergence time
Two different strategies were explored to estimate population divergence times. First we enforced the standard mitochondrial arthropod rate fixed at 2.3% pair-wise divergence per million years (0.0115 substitutions per year and lineage , and secondly we implemented a mitochondrial rate range of 1.4 to 2.6% substitutions per million years, that was previously estimated for marine decapods and has been frequently applied to other crustaceans [6, 26, 52]. In both approaches, the cox1 data set of the 162 sampled individuals was used applying an uncorrelated log-normal clock, assuming a coalescent model with constant population size as the best model fitting the data. BEAST  analyses were run starting from a random tree and using the models and partitions described for the MrBayes analyses. The remaining parameters (nucleotide frequencies and substitution model across partitions) and the rate-heterogeneity models were unlinked and estimated from the data. The search was set to 20 million generations, sampling every 1000 generations. The prior for the crustacean mitochondrial range in clock rate was implemented as a normal distribution with a mean of 0.01 substitutions per year per lineage, with maximum and minimum values of 0.013 and 0.007, respectively. The outputs of two independent runs were analysed using Tracer v. 1.4 after discarding the first 2 million generations. In another analysis, a reduced data set comprising the three combined mitochondrial genes from 34 individuals representing the major lineages was used and applied the fixed standard arthropod mitochondrial clock mentioned above but assuming a Yule model.
We greatly appreciate support provided by Joan R. Bosch, Rafel Mas and Antoni Martínez Taberner to locate suitable wells in the Pollença, Búger and Ruberts areas, respectively, and by Lluc García, Alejandro Botello, Fernando Cánovas and Bartomeu Cañellas during fieldwork. Marta Fuster prepared the maps. The constructive criticism and suggestions made by Jean-François Flot and two anonymous reviewers considerably improved the final version of the manuscript. Research has been supported by Spanish grants CGL2006-01365, CGL2009-08256 and CGL2010-18616 of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and European Union FEDER funds. MMRB benefited from a FPI fellowship from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation.
- Poulson TL, White WB: The cave environment. Science. 1969, 165: 971-981. 10.1126/science.165.3897.971.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Juan C, Guzik MT, Jaume D, Cooper SJB: Evolution in caves: Darwin's 'wrecks of ancient life' in the molecular era. Mol Ecol. 2010, 19: 3865-3880. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04759.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Proudlove G, Wood PJ: The blind leading the blind: cryptic subterranean species and DNA taxonomy. Trends Ecol Evol. 2003, 18: 272-273. 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00095-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lefébure T, Douady CJ, Gouy M, Trontelj P, Briolay J, Gibert J: Phylogeography of a subterranean amphipod reveals cryptic diversity and dynamic evolution in extreme environments. Mol Ecol. 2006, 15: 1797-1806. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02888.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cooper SJB, Bradbury JH, Saint KM, Leys R, Austin AD, Humphreys WF: Subterranean archipelago in the Australian arid zone: mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of amphipods from central Western Australia. Mol Ecol. 2007, 16: 1533-1544. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03261.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Finston TL, Johnson MS, Humphreys WF, Eberhard SM, Halse SA: Cryptic speciation in two widespread subterranean amphipod genera reflects historical drainage patterns in an ancient landscape. Mol Ecol. 2007, 16: 355-365.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Notenboom J: Marine regressions and the evolution of groundwater dwelling amphipods (Crustacea). J Biogeogr. 1991, 18: 437-454. 10.2307/2845485.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Botosaneanu L, Holsinger JR: Some aspects concerning colonization of the subterranean realm - especially of subterranean waters: a response to Rouch & Danielopol, 1987. Stygologia. 1991, 6: 11-39.Google Scholar
- Boutin C, Coineau N: "Regression model", "Modèle biphase" d'évolution et origine des microorganismes stygobies interstitiels continentaux. Rev Micropaléont. 1990, 33: 303-322.Google Scholar
- Holsinger JR: Pattern and process in the biogeography of subterranean amphipods. Hydrobiologia. 1994, 287: 131-145. 10.1007/BF00006902.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Murphy NP, Adams M, Austin AD: Independent colonization and extensive cryptic speciation of freshwater amphipods in the isolated groundwater springs of Australia's Great Artesian Basin. Mol Ecol. 2009, 18: 109-122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Trontelj P, Douady CJ, Fiser C, Gibert J, Spela G, Lefébure T, Sket B, Zaksek V: A molecular test for cryptic diversity in ground water: how large are the ranges of macro-stygobionts?. Freshwater Biol. 2009, 54: 727-744. 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01877.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kano Y, Kase T: Genetic exchange between anchialine cave populations by means of larval dispersal: the case of a new gastropod species Neritilia cavernicola. Zool Scr. 2004, 33 (5): 423-437. 10.1111/j.0300-3256.2004.00159.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Russ AD, Santos SR, Muir C: Genetic population structure of an anchialine shrimp, Metabetaeus lohena (Crustacea: Alpheidae), in the Hawaiian Islands. Rev Biol Trop. 2010, 58 (1): 159-170.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Calman WT: Crustacea- In: Lankester ER ed., A treatise on Zoology. Adam & Charles Black, London. 1909, 7 (3): 1-346.Google Scholar
- Botosaneanu L: Stygofauna Mundi. A faunistic, distributional and ecological synthesis of the world fauna inhabiting subterranean waters (including the marine interstitial). E J Brill, Leiden. 1986Google Scholar
- Danielopol DL: An essay to assess the age of the freshwater interstitial ostracods of Europe. Bijdr Dierkd. 1980, 50: 243-291.Google Scholar
- Rouch R, Danielopol DL: L'origine de la faune aquatique souterraine, entre le paradigme du refuge et le modèle de la colonisation active. Stygologia. 1987, 3: 345-372.Google Scholar
- Danielopol DL, Bonaduce G: The origin and distribution of the interstitial Ostracoda of the species group Xestoleberis arcturi Triebel (Crustacea). Cour Forsch Senck. 1990, 123: 69-86.Google Scholar
- Page TJ, Humphreys WF, Hughes JM: Shrimps down under: Evolutionary relationships of subterranean crustaceans from Western Australia (Decapoda: Atyidae: Stygiocaris). PloS ONE. 2008, 3: e1618-10.1371/journal.pone.0001618.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Stock JH, Iliffe TM, Williams D: The concept "anchialine" reconsidered. Stygologia. 1986, 2: 90-92.Google Scholar
- Boutin C: Phylogeny and biogeography of metacrangonyctid amphipods in North Africa. Hydrobiologia. 1994, 287: 49-64. 10.1007/BF00006896.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jaume D, Christenson K: Amphi-Atlantic distribution of the subterranean amphipod family Metacrangonyctidae (Crustacea, Gammaridea). Contrib Zool. 2001, 70: 99-125.Google Scholar
- Dupanloup I, Schneider S, Excoffier L: A simulated annealing approach to define the genetic structure of populations. Mol Ecol. 2002, 11: 2571-2581. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01650.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brower AVZ: Rapid morphological radiation and convergence among races of the butterfly Heliconius erato inferred from patterns of mitochondrial DNA evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994, 91: 6491-6495. 10.1073/pnas.91.14.6491.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Knowlton N, Weigt LA: New dates and new rates for divergence across the Isthmus of Panama. Proc R Soc Lond B. 1998, 265: 2257-2263. 10.1098/rspb.1998.0568.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pomar L: Reef geometries, erosion surfaces and high-frequency sea-level changes, upper miocene Reef Complex, Mallorca, Spain. Sedimentology. 1991, 38: 243-269. 10.1111/j.1365-3091.1991.tb01259.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Krijgsman W, Hilgen FJ, Raffi I, Sierro FJ, Wilson DS: Chronology, causes and progression of the Messinian salinity crisis. Nature. 1999, 400: 652-655. 10.1038/23231.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cuerda J, Sacarés J, Colom G: Hallazgo de terrazas marinas en la región de Lluchmayor (Mallorca). Acta Geol Hisp. 1969, 4: 25-37.Google Scholar
- Shackleton NJ, Opdyke ND: Oxygen isotope and palaeomagnetic stratigraphy of Equatorial Pacific core V28-238: Oxygen isotope temperatures and ice volumes on a 105 year and 106 year scale. Quat Res. 1973, 3: 39-55. 10.1016/0033-5894(73)90052-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shackleton NJ, Backman H, Zimmerman H, Kent DV, Hall MA, Roberts DG, Schnitker D, Baldauf JG, Desprairies A, Homrighausen R, et al: Oxygen isotope calibration of the onset of ice-rafting and history of glaciation in the North Atlantic region. Nature. 1984, 307: 620-623. 10.1038/307620a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sosdian S, Yair Rosenthal: Deep-sea temperature and ice volume changes across the Pliocene-Pleistocene climate transitions. Science. 2009, 325: 306-310. 10.1126/science.1169938.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lefébure T, Douady CJ, Mallard F, Gibert J: Testing dispersal and cryptic diversity in a widely distributed groundwater amphipod (Niphargus rhenorhodanensis). Mol Phylogenets Evol. 2007, 42: 676-686. 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.08.020.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cvetkov L: Un filet phréatobiologique. Bull Inst Zool Mus Acad Bulgare Sci Sofia. 1968, 27: 215-218.Google Scholar
- Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek RC: DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1994, 3: 294-299.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barraclough TG, Hogan JE, Vogler AP: Testing whether ecological factors promote cladogenesis in a group of tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). Proc R Soc Lond B. 1999, 266: 1061-1067. 10.1098/rspb.1999.0744.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Colgan DJ, Mclauchlan A, Wilson GDF, Livingston S, Edgecombe GD, Macaranas J, Cassis G, Gray MR: Molecular phylogenetics of the Arthropoda: relationships based on histone H and U2 snRNA DNA sequences. Aust J Zool. 1998, 46: 419-437. 10.1071/ZO98048.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sorenson MD, Franzosa EA: TreeRot, version 3. 2007, Boston University, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
- Swofford D: PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using Parsimony* (and other methods), 4.0b10. 2002, Sunderland, MA: Sinauer AssociatesGoogle Scholar
- Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F: MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics. 2001, 17: 754-755. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Posada D: jModelTest: Phylogenetic Model Averaging. Mol Biol Evol. 2008, 25: 1253-1256. 10.1093/molbev/msn083.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schwarz G: Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat. 1978, 461-464. 6:
- Rambaut A, Drummond AJ: Tracer v. 1.4. 2007, [http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/Trace]Google Scholar
- Stamatakis A, Ludwin T, Meier H: RAxML-III: a fast program for maximum likelihood-based inference of large phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21: 456-463. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti191.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maddison WP, Maddison DR: Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.7.1. 2009, [http://mesquiteproject.org]Google Scholar
- Bonnet E, Van de Peer Y: zt: A sofware tool for simple and partial Mantel tests. J Stat Softw. 2002, 7: 1-12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S: Arlequin (version 3.0): An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online. 2005, 1: 47-50.Google Scholar
- Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM: Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics. 1992, 131: 479-491.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Fu Y-X: Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics. 1997, 147: 915-925.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ramos-Onsins SE, Rozas J: Statistical properties of new neutrality tests against population growth. Mol Biol Evol. 2002, 19: 2092-2100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Librado P, Rozas J: DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics. 2009, 25: 1451-1452. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kornobis E, Pálsson S, Kristjánsson BK, Svavarsson J: Molecular evidence of the survival of subterranean amphipods (Arthropoda) during Ice Age underneath glaciers in Iceland. Mol Ecol. 2010, 19: 2516-2530.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Drummond AJ, Rambaut A: BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol Biol. 2007, 7: 214-10.1186/1471-2148-7-214.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.