Open Access

Oldest record of Trimeniaceae from the Early Cretaceous of northern Japan

  • Toshihiro Yamada1Email author,
  • Harufumi Nishida2,
  • Masayoshi Umebayashi1,
  • Kazuhiko Uemura3 and
  • Masahiro Kato4
BMC Evolutionary Biology20088:135

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-135

Received: 22 February 2008

Accepted: 08 May 2008

Published: 08 May 2008

Abstract

Background

Molecular phylogenetic analyses have identified Trimeniaceae, a monotypic family distributed only in Oceania, as among the earliest diverging families of extant angiosperms. Therefore, the fossils of this family are helpful to understand the earliest flowering plants. Paleobotanical information is also important to track the historical and geographical pathways to endemism of the Trimeniaceae. However, fossils of the family were previously unknown from the Early Cretaceous, the time when the angiosperm radiated. In this study, we report a seed from the late Albian (ca. 100 million years ago) of Japan representing the oldest known occurrence of Trimeniaceae and discuss the character evolution and biogeography of this family.

Results

A structurally preserved seed was collected from the early Late Albian Hikagenosawa Formation of the Yezo Group, which was deposited in palaeolatitudes of 35 to 40°N. The seed has a multilayered stony exotesta with alveolate surface, parenchymatous mesotesta, and operculate inner integument, which are characteristic to extant trimeniaceous seeds. However, the seed differs from extant seeds, i.e., in its well-developed endosperm and absence of antiraphal vascular bundle. Thus, the seed would be a new genus and species of Trimeniaceae.

Conclusion

The fossil seed indicates that seed coat characters were conserved for 100 million years or more in Trimeniaceae. It also suggests that the antiraphal vascular bundle and perispermy originated secondarily in Trimeniaceae as previously inferred from the phylogeny and character distribution in the extant basalmost angiosperms. The fossil seed provides the first evidence that Trimeniaceae was distributed in a midlatitude location of the Northern Hemisphere during the Early Cretaceous, when angiosperms radiated extensively, supporting a hypothesis that the extant austral distribution is relict.

Background

Trimeniaceae is a small family consisting of only the genus Trimenia, with eight species known from Celebes to eastern Australia and the southwest Pacific [1, 2]. Trimenia consists of shrubs and lianas that have unisexual or bisexual flowers with numerous tepals and stamens and a single carpel [14]. A solitary pendant ovule is enclosed in the ovary and develops into a seed with a stony seed coat contained in a berry [1, 47]. The family was placed in the Laurales based on floral structures, such as the single carpel and ovule per flower [3, 4], but molecular phylogenetic studies have identified it as one of the earliest diverging families of extant angiosperms, along with the Amborellaceae, Nymphaeales [Cabombaceae and Nymphaeaceae], Hydatellaceae, Austrobaileyaceae, and Illiciaceae [811]. Thus, clarifying the primitive character states of Trimeniaceae would be helpful in understanding the earliest flowers. In particular, information on key innovations of angiosperms, for example, fruit, bitegmic seeds, and endosperm, would provide clues to solving the origin of angiosperms, a central mystery of plant evolution [12, 13].

Great efforts have been made to find evidence of early angiosperms from the Early to mid-Cretaceous, when the angiosperms radiated extensively [1420]. The early emergence of Nymphaeales [18, 21] and Illiciaceae [16] in the fossil record partly supports the phylogenetic framework inferred from molecular data. However, direct evidence that the other earliest diverging families emerged in the early phase of angiosperm radiation [20] has not been found, although paleobotanical records [16, 18], as well as phylogeny [811], imply that these families should have diverged by the mid-Cretaceous [22].

From the austral distribution of Trimeniaceae, and the similar distribution of Amborellaceae and Austrobaileyaceae [1], neobotanists have inferred the Gondwana origin of these families [23, 24], but accumulated palynological data have indicated that a different explanation is needed for this distribution. These data indicate that angiosperms originated in low paleolatitudes (20°N to 20°S) no later than the Hauterivian, Early Cretaceous, about 132 million years ago [25, 26] and spread toward the poles over time [2628]. Pollen records provide temporal and spatial distribution patterns of angiosperms, with the implication that the Trimeniaceae could have migrated to Laurasia, a continental mass in the Northern Hemisphere. However, pollen is difficult to assign to extant families due to the frequent convergent evolution of pollen morphology, such as the number and position of apertures [20, 29]. Moreover, extant Trimenia pollens are eurypalynos with regard to the number of aperture even in a same species [29], obscuring diagnostic pollen characters in familiar level. Thus, findings from other reproductive structures, such as flowers, fruits, and seeds, are needed to confirm the past existence of the Trimeniaceae in the Northern Hemisphere.

We report the oldest seed of Trimeniaceae from the Early Cretaceous Yezo Group in Hokkaido, northern Japan, and discuss character evolution and biogeography of the Trimeniaceae.

Geological settings and other paleobotanical data of collection site

A structurally preserved seed was found within a calcareous siltstone nodule collected at Pombetsu, Mikasa City, Hokkaido, Japan (Figure 1). The Hikagenosawa Formation of the Yezo Group outcrops in the area and contains ammonoids indicating a date in the early Late Albian [30, 31]. Palaeomagnetic studies show that these sediments were deposited in palaeolatitudes of 35 to 40°N and that the sedimentary basin was located on the eastern side of Laurasia [30, 32]. Because the formation mainly consists of offshore sediments, there are few palaeobotanical records within it [3335], but a subtropical climate with dry seasons seems to have prevailed in the area, as suggested by the occurrence of a cheirolepidiaceous conifer [34] and a variety of ephedroid palynomorphs [33].
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2148-8-135/MediaObjects/12862_2008_Article_704_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Geological map of Ponbetsu area and locality of the trimeniaceous seed. Ponbetsu area are boxed in large-scale map of Hokkaido on the left-bottom corner. Geological map is redrawn from Narita et al. 31.

Results

The seed is ellipsoid, 3 mm long and 2.2 mm thick. It has an inner integument and an outer seed coat (testa) (Figures 2a,c,e). The micropyle is formed by both inner integument and testa (endostome and exostome, respectively) and adjacent to the hilum, which contains tracheids and sclerenchymatous fibers, i.e., the seed is anatropous (Figures 2e,f). These tracheids and fibers are found only in sections through the raphal side, thus the vascular bundle does not extend to the antiraphal side beyond the chalaza (Figure 2e). The inner integument is almost crushed, except in the endostomic region, where the inner integument is thickened to form the operculum (Figures 2c,f). The testa consists of an outer (exotesta) and inner (mesotesta) part. The exotesta comprises one to five layers of isodiametric cells, while the mesotesta is made up of four to five layers of longitudinally elongated cells. The exotesta is lignified to give mechanical strength to the seed coat (Figure 2c). In a nearly tangential section through the seed surface, there are polygonal openings in the exotesta, indicating the presence of polygonal areoles on the exotestal surface (asterisks in Figure 2h). This configuration was further examined by reconstructing a three-dimensional image of the seed surface by compiling serial peel sections, revealing that the exotestal surface is alveolate (Figure 2k). Inside the inner integument are three membranous structures. The outermost structure, connected to the chalaza, is the nucellar epidermis (Figure 2a and arrowheads in Figures 2c,g). The innermost structure is observed only in sections through the center of the seed and encircles an area 200 μm in length and 40 μm in width (arrowhead 3 in Figure 2g).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2148-8-135/MediaObjects/12862_2008_Article_704_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Fossil and extant seeds of Trimeniaceae share many morphological characters. Section of fossil (a, c, e-h) and seed of Trimenia moorei (b, d, i); surface of T. moorei (j) and fossil (k) seed. Close-up (c) of the micropylar part of (a); (g) is near apex of the nucellus. em, embryo; es, endosperm; et, exotesta; i, inner integument; mt, mesotesta; op, operculum; ps, perisperm. (c, g) arrowheads indicate the nucellar epidermis (1), endosperm membrane (2) and embryo (3). (e) Arrows show tracheids and fibers observed in the hilum. (h) Asterisks indicate areoles seen in nearly paradermal sections of the surface. Scale bars in a and b, 500 μm; e, 200 μm; others, 100 μm.

Discussion

Relationships of the fossil seed

Although seed structures have not been examined in all Trimenia species, available information on four species (T. moorei, T. neocaledonica, T. papuana, and T. weinmanniifolia) suggests that Trimeniaceae is uniform family in regard of ovule and seed structures [1, 47]. The seed of extant Trimenia is characterized by the testa, consisting of a lignified multilayered exotesta with an alveolate surface and a nonlignified multilayered mesotesta (Figures 2b,d,i,j) [1, 4, 7]. Although many families possess seed coats with a hardened exotesta, none other than Trimeniaceae is known to possess a multilayered exotesta [1, 4, 7, 36]. The seeds of some taxa are similar in appearance to the Trimeniaceae seed in that the testa consists of outer sclerotic and inner non-sclerotic cell layers. These taxa include the genus Nuphar (Nymphaeaceae) [37, 38], the families Buxaceae [36], Simmondsiaceae [39], Melianthaceae [40], Myrtaceae [36, 41], and Theaceae [36], and the order Sapindales [36, 42]. However, in these taxa, the stony outer layer is composed of a single-layered columnar exotesta and the outer part of the isodiametric mesotestal cells, whereas the exotesta of Trimenia is composed uniformly of sclerotic isodiametric cells, which are derivatives of the outer epidermis of the outer integument [7]. Thus, to our knowledge, no other seeds can be compared to the fossil seed.

The fossil seed is not distinguishable from that of extant Trimenia in terms of shape, size, anatropy, bitegmy, endo and exostomic micropyle, crushed inner integument with an operculum, lignified multilayered exotesta composed of isodiametric cells, alveolate surface of the exotesta, or nonlignified multilayered mesotesta (Figure 2). These remarkable similarities unequivocally indicate the close affinity of the fossil seed to the Trimeniaceae. The fossil seed differs from Trimenia seed in the absence of antiraphal vascular bundle (Figure 2e) and in the size of membranous structures surrounding the nucellus (Figures 2c,g; see below for details). Thus, a new genus of Trimeniaceae should be assigned to the fossil seed. The seed also differs from Trimenia seed in having a stalklike structure at the nucellar base (Figure 2a). This stalklike structure might represent a diagnostic feature of the seed, but the structure could be artificially formed by shrinkage.

Divergence time of Trimeniaceae

Molecular phylogeny indicates that the Trimeniaceae diverged after the Nymphaeales and before the Illiciaceae [811]. Thus, diversification of the Trimeniaceae in the Early to earliest Late Cretaceous (from 125 to 90 million years ago) is indicated [22] by the Late Barremian flower of the Nymphaeales from Portugal [18] and the Cenomanian to Turonian seeds of the Illiciaceae from Kazakhstan [16]. Although Trimeniaceae-like triporate or polyforate pollen was collected in the Albian to Cenomanian of Brazil [43, 44], the Barremian of Portugal [15, 17] and the Campanian to Maastrichitian (83–65 million years ago) of Australia and Antarctica [44, 45], the possibility could not be ruled out that these are assigned to other families [20, 29, 44, 46]. Longstrethia varidentata, a foliar species reported from the Cenomanian of Nebraska, is similar to leaves of Trimeniaceae in presence of an intermarginal vein, but L. varidentata would represent a stem-group taxon of Trimeniaceae-Illiciaceae clade because some characters are also shared with Illiciaceae [47]. Therefore, no unequivocal record of Trimeniaceae in the Cretaceous existed. The fossil seed provides the first unequivocal evidence of Trimeniaceae 100 million years ago that fills the gap between molecular data and paleobotanical records.

Character evolution in Trimeniaceae

The fossil seed coat structures are strikingly similar to those of Trimenia (Figure 2). Although these characters were acquired 100 million or more years ago and are conserved in Trimeniaceae, the mode of nutrient storage of the fossil seed would have differed considerably from that of the extant Trimenia. The Trimenia embryo is enclosed by the endosperm, which is further surrounded by the perisperm, an additional storage tissue (Figures 2d,i) [4, 6, 7]. However, the fossil seed has two membranous structures inside the nucellus, and the area encircled by the inner structure corresponds in size to the dormant mature embryo of extant Trimeniaceae (Figures 2g,i). If this comparison is correct, the outer structure may be comparable to the endosperm membrane. In albuminous seeds without a perisperm, the epidermis of the nucellus is either completely disintegrated by the enlarged endosperm or vestigially retained as a crushed layer, whereas in perispermous seeds, it is retained as the epidermis of the perisperm [6, 7, 36]. The fossil has a relatively well preserved nucellar epidermis, which may imply the presence of a perisperm. The putative endosperm in the fossil occupies a large area inside the nucellus, and thus the endosperm would have played a major storage role. Among the earliest families to diverge, only Nymphaeales [38], Hydatellaceae [48], and Trimeniaceae [4, 6, 7] have a diploid maternal perisperm, which occupies a larger area than the diploid or polyploid fertilized endosperm. This character variation implies that the storage function was largely taken over by the perisperm secondarily [49, 50] and that the fossil seed may have been on the way toward perispermy.

The fossil seed vasculature is different from that of extant Trimenia. In Trimenia, the vascular bundle supplied from the fruit wall enters the raphe of the seed and extends to the antiraphal side beyond the chalaza [4]. Lack of antiraphal vascular bundles in the fossil seed suggests that the antiraphal bundle is a derived character in the Trimeniaceae. This is consistent with the hypothesis, based on character distribution in extant basalmost angiosperms, that the antiraphal bundle is a derived character in the angiosperm seed [6, 51].

So far, we know only the seed of this trimeniaceous fossil, but the areoles sculptured in the seed surface may imply that the fossil seed was contained in a berry because the pressure of berry endocarp cells forms areoles on seeds of extant Trimenia [17].

Biogeography

Extant Trimeniaceae species are distributed in eastern Australia and an island chain stretching from Celebes to the Moluccas, New Guinea, New Caledonia, Fiji, Samoa, and the Marquesas [1, 2, 4]. Along with the Trimeniaceae, other basalmost families (Amborellaceae, Hydatellaceae, Austrobaileyaceae) and many eumagnoliid families (e.g., Degeneriaceae, Monimiaceae, Winteraceae) now grow only in derivative fragments of Gondwanaland [1, 4, 52]. Contrary to their extant austral distribution, palynological records suggest that early angiosperms originated in the low latitudes [25, 26] and migrated both northward and southward [2628]. Thus, the paleobotanical data indicate that the current austral distributions do not reflect the cradle of angiosperms but the area of conservation [2628]. At the same time, the poleward migration model predicts the past occurrence of these basalmost angiosperm families in the Northern Hemisphere. Some pollen grains, tentatively assigned to the Amborellaceae [53] or Trimeniaceae [15, 17, 20], are reported from the Northern Hemisphere, but familial assignations of pollen are difficult [20, 29, 46]. The fossil seed reveals that Trimeniaceae occurred in the eastern margin of Laurasia in the Northern Hemisphere during the Albian period and indicates a reduction to the relict area subsequent to the hypothesized bipolar migration.

Conclusion

Fossil seed of Trimeniaceae is described from the Early Cretaceous (ca. 100 million years ago) Yezo Group in Hokkaido, northern Japan. The seed, which is the oldest yet found for the family, indicates; 1) Some seed coat structures of Trimeniaceae have been conserved for about 100 million years, including the multilayered stony exotesta with alveolate surface, parenchymatous mesotesta, and operculate inner integument. 2) The secondary origins of the perisperm and antiraphal vascular bundle. 3) Trimeniaceae was distributed in a midlatitude location of the Northern Hemisphere during the Early Cretaceous, when angiosperms radiated extensively, supporting that the extant austral distribution is relict.

Methods

Materials (Yamada 001002) and methods for plastic sections and SEM micrograph of Trimenia moorei (extant) were described previously [7]. The fossil seed was sectioned in planes tangential to the raphe, and the extant seed was sectioned in planes parallel to the raphe. A part of the fossil seed, 1.5 mm thick, was cut into 38 successive peel sections, i.e., one section is ca. 40 μm thick. For reconstruction, the outline of the seed surface was traced, and surface views were compiled manually by overlying successive camera lucida drawings. The slides of serial sections and the nodule containing the seed are stored in the National Museum of Nature and Science, Tokyo, Japan, as NSM-PP-9176.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank K. Kobayashi and N. Kobayashi for kindly providing us lodgings. The Sorachi Forest Management Office permitted us to conduct our field survey within its boundary. This research was supported by Grants-in-Aid for scientific research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science to TY and MK.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Kanazawa University
(2)
Faculty of Science and Engineering, Chuo University
(3)
Department of Geology and Paleontology, National Museum of Nature and Science
(4)
Department of Botany, National Museum of Nature and Science

References

  1. Kubitzki K, Rohwer JG, Bittrich V: The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. Flowering Plants. Dicotyledons. 1993, Springer, Berlin, II:View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Wanger WL, Lorence DH: A revision of Trimenia Seem. (Trimeniaceae) in the Marquesas Islands with description of a new species, Trimenia nukuhivensis. Adansonia. 1999, 21: 225-230.Google Scholar
  3. Money LI, Bailey IW, Swamy BGL: The morphology and relationships of the Monimiaceae. J Arnold Arbor. 1950, 31: 372-404.Google Scholar
  4. Endress PK, Sampson FB: Floral structure and relationships of the Trimeniaceae (Laurales). J Arnold Arbor. 1983, 64: 447-473.Google Scholar
  5. Endress PK, Igersheim A: Gynoecium diversity and systematics of the Laurales. Bot J Linn Soc. 1997, 125: 93-168. 10.1006/bojl.1997.0113.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Prakash N: An embryological study of Piptocalyx moorei (Trimeniaceae). Plant form and function. Edited by: Bhatia B, Shukla AK, Sharma HL. 1998, New Delhi: Angkor Publishers, 207-216.Google Scholar
  7. Yamada T, Imaichi R, Prakash N, Kato M: Developmental morphology of ovules and seeds of Austrobaileyales. Aust J Bot. 2003, 51: 555-564. 10.1071/BT03056.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Qiu YL, Lee J, Bernasconi-Quadroni F, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Zanis M, Zimmer EA, Chen ZD, Savolainen V, Chase MW: The earliest angiosperms: evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes. Nature. 1999, 402: 404-407. 10.1038/46536.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Jansen RK, Cai Z, Raubeson LA, Daniell H, dePamphilis CW, Leebens-Mack J, Müller KF, Guisinger-Bellian M, Haberle RC, Hansen AK, Chumley TW, Lee SB, Peery R, McNeal JR, Kuehl JV, Boore JL: Analysis of 81 genes from 64 plastid genomes resolves relationships in angiosperms and identifies genome-scale evolutionary patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007, 104: 19369-19374. 10.1073/pnas.0709121104.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Moore MJ, Bell CD, Soltis PS, Soltis DE: Using plastid genome-scale data to resolve enigmatic relationships among basal angiosperms. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007, 104: 19363-19368. 10.1073/pnas.0708072104.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Saarela JM, Rai HS, Doyle JA, Endress PK, Mathews S, Marchant AD, Briggs BG, Graham SW: Hydatellaceae identified as a new branch near the base of the angiosperm phylogenetic tree. Nature. 2007, 446: 312-315. 10.1038/nature05612.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Friedman WE: Embryological evidence for developmental lability during early angiosperm evolution. Nature. 2006, 441: 337-340. 10.1038/nature04690.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Frohlich MW: Recent developments regarding the evolutionary origin of flowers. Adv Bot Res. 2006, 44: 63-127. 10.1016/S0065-2296(06)44002-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Sun G, Dilcher DL, Zheng S, Zhou Z: In search of the first flower: a Jurassic angiosperm, Archaefructus, from northeast China. Science. 1998, 282: 1692-1695. 10.1126/science.282.5394.1692.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Friis EM, Pedersen KR, Crane PR: Early angiosperm diversification: the diversity of pollen associated with angiosperm reproductive structures in early Cretaceous floras from Portugal. Ann Mo Bot Gard. 1999, 86: 259-296. 10.2307/2666179.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Frumin S, Friis EM: Magnoliid reproductive organs from the Cenomanian-Turonian of north western Kazakhstan: Magnoliaceae and Illiciaceae. Plant Syst Evol. 1999, 216: 265-288. 10.1007/BF01084403.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Friis EM, Pedersen KR, Crane PR: Reproductive structure and organization of basal angiosperms from the Early Cretaceous (Barremian or Aptian) of western Portugal. Int J Plant Sci. 2000, 161 (Suppl 6): S169-S182. 10.1086/317570.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Friis EM, Pedersen KR, Crane PR: Fossil evidence of water lilies (Nymphaeales) in the Early Cretaceous. Nature. 2001, 410: 357-360. 10.1038/35066557.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sun G, Ji Q, Dilcher DL, Zheng S, Nixon KC, Wang X: Archaefructaceae, a new basal angiosperm family. Science. 2002, 296: 899-904. 10.1126/science.1069439.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Friis EM, Pedersen KR, Crane PR: Cretaceous angiosperm flowers: Innovation and evolution in plant reproduction. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 2006, 232: 251-293. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.07.006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Friis EM, Doyle JA, Endress PK, Leng Q: Archaefructus-angiosperm precursor or specialized early angiosperm?. Trends Plant Sci. 2003, 8: 369-373. 10.1016/S1360-1385(03)00161-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Schneider H, Schuettpelz E, Pryer KM, Cranfill R, Magallón S, Lupia R: Ferns diversified in the shadow of angiosperms. Nature. 2004, 428: 553-557. 10.1038/nature02361.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Bailey IW: Origin of angiosperms: Need for a broadened outlook. J Arnold Arbor. 1949, 30: 64-70.Google Scholar
  24. Cronquist A: The Evolution and Classification of Flowering Plants. 1988, New York Botanical Garden, New York, 2Google Scholar
  25. Hughes NF, McDougall AB, Chapman JL: Exceptional new records of Cretaceous Hauterivian angiospermid pollen from southern England. J Micropalaeontol. 1991, 10: 75-82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Crane PR, Lidgard S: Angiosperm diversification and paleolatitudinal gradients in Cretaceous floristic diversity. Science. 1989, 246: 675-678. 10.1126/science.246.4930.675.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Axelrod DI: Poleward migration of early angiosperm floras. Science. 1954, 130: 203-207. 10.1126/science.130.3369.203.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Doyle JA: Evolutionary, geographic, and ecological aspects of the rise of angiosperms. Proc 27th Int Geol Congr, Paleontol. 1984, 2: 23-33.Google Scholar
  29. Sampson FB: Variation and similarities in pollen features in some basal angiosperms, with some taxonomic implications. Plant Syst Evol. 2007, 263: 59-75. 10.1007/s00606-006-0467-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Takashima R, Kawabe F, Nishi H, Moriya K, Wani R, Ando H: Geology and stratigraphy of forearc basin sediments in Hokkaido, Japan: Cretaceous environmental events on the north-west Pacific margin. Cret Res. 2004, 25: 365-390. 10.1016/j.cretres.2004.02.004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Narita A, Yamada T, Matsumoto M: Platanoid leaves from Cenomanian to Turonian Mikasa Formation, northern Japan and their mode of occurrence. Paleontol Res. 2008, 12: 81-88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Kodama K, Maeda H, Shigeta Y, Kase T, Takeuchi T: Integrated biostratigraphy and magnetostratigraphy of the Upper Cretaceous System along the River Naiba in southern Sakhalin, Russia. J Geol Soc Japan. 2002, 108: 366-384.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Takahashi M, Takai K, Saiki K: Ephedroid fossil pollen from the Lower Cretaceous (Upper Albian) of Hokkaido, Japan. J Plant Res. 1995, 108: 11-15. 10.1007/BF02344300.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Saiki K: Frenelopsis pombetsuensis : a new cheirolepidiaceous conifer from the Lower Cretaceous (Albian) of Hokkaido, Japan. Paleontol Res. 1997, 1: 126-131.Google Scholar
  35. Takahashi K, Suzuki M: Dicotyledonous fossil wood flora and early evolution of wood characters in the Cretaceous of Hokkaido, Japan. IAWA J. 2003, 24: 269-309.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Corner EJH: The seeds of dicotyledons. 1976, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1,2:Google Scholar
  37. Collinson ME: Recent and Tertiary seeds of the Nymphaeaceae sensu lato with a revision of Brasenia ovula (Brong.) Reid et Chandler. Ann Bot. 1980, 46: 603-632.Google Scholar
  38. Yamada T, Imaichi R, Kato M: Developmental morphology of ovules and seeds of Nymphaeales. Amer J Bot. 2001, 88: 963-974. 10.2307/2657077.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Tobe H, Yasuda S, Oginuma K: Seed coat anatomy, karyomorphology, and relationships of Simmondsia (Simmondsiaceae). Bot Mag Tokyo. 1992, 105: 529-538. 10.1007/BF02489427.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Doweld AB: The systematic relevance of fruit and seed structure in Bersama and Melianthus (Melianthaceae). Plant Syst Evol. 2001, 227: 75-103. 10.1007/s006060170058.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Landrum LR, Sharp WP: Seed coat characters of some American Myrtinae (Myrtaceae): Psidium and related genera. Syst Bot. 1989, 14: 370-376. 10.2307/2418927.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Doweld AB: The systematic relevance of fruit and seed anatomy and morphology of Akania (Akaniaceae). Bot J Linn Soc. 1996, 120: 379-389. 10.1006/bojl.1996.0020.Google Scholar
  43. Herngreen GFW: Palynology of Albian-Cenomanian strata of Borehole 1-QS-1-MA, state of Maranhao, Brazil. Pollen Spores. 1973, 15: 515-555.Google Scholar
  44. Dettmann ME, Jarzen DM: The Antarctic/Australian rift valley: Late Cretaceous cradle of northeastern Australian relicts?. Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 1990, 65: 131-144. 10.1016/0034-6667(90)90064-P.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Dettmann ME: Cretaceous vegetation: the microfossil record. History of the Australian Vegetation: Cretaceous to Recent. Edited by: Hill RS. 1994, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 143-170.Google Scholar
  46. Walker JW, Doyle JA: Ultrastructure and relationships of mid-Cretaceous polyforate and triporate pollen from Northern Gondwana. Ultrastructure of fossil spores and pollen. Edited by: Kurmann K, Doyle JA. 1994, London: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 161-172.Google Scholar
  47. Upchurch GR, Dilcher DL: Cenomanian angiosperm leaf megafossils, Dakota Formation, Rose Creek Locality, Jefferson County, southeastern Nebraska. U S Geol Surv Bull. 1990, 1915: 1-55.Google Scholar
  48. Rudall PJ, Sokoloff DD, Remizowa MV, Conran JG, Davis JI, Macfarlane TD, Stevenson DW: Morphology of Hydatellaceae, an anomalous aquatic family recently recognized as an early-divergent angiosperm lineage. Amer J Bot. 2007, 94: 1073-1092. 10.3732/ajb.94.7.1073.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Floyd SK, Friedman WF: Evolution of endosperm developmental patterns among basal flowering plants. Int J Plant Sci. 2000, 161 (Suppl 6): S57-S81. 10.1086/317579.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Doyle JA, Endress PK: Morphological phylogenetic analysis of basal angiosperms: comparison and combination with molecular data. Int J Plant Sci. 2000, 161 (Suppl 6): S121-S153. 10.1086/317578.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Tobe H, Jaffré T, Raven PH: Embryology of Amborella (Amborellaceae): descriptions and polarity of character states. J Plant Res. 2000, 113: 271-260. 10.1007/PL00013935.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Hamann U: Hydatellaceae. The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants IV. Flowering Plants. Monocotyledons. Alismatanae and Commelinanae (except Gramineae). Edited by: Kubitzki K. 1998, Berlin: Springer, 231-234.Google Scholar
  53. Hughes NF, McDougall AB: Records of angiospermid pollen entry into the english early cretaceous succession. Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 1987, 50: 255-272. 10.1016/0034-6667(87)90003-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Yamada et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement