- Research article
- Open Access
The impact of natural transformation on adaptation in spatially structured bacterial populations
© Moradigaravand and Engelstädter; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 20 February 2014
Accepted: 8 June 2014
Published: 20 June 2014
Recent studies have demonstrated that natural transformation and the formation of highly structured populations in bacteria are interconnected. In spite of growing evidence about this connection, little is known about the dynamics of natural transformation in spatially structured bacterial populations.
In this work, we model the interdependency between the dynamics of the bacterial gene pool and those of environmental DNA in space to dissect the effect of transformation on adaptation. Our model reveals that even with only a single locus under consideration, transformation with a free DNA fragment pool results in complex adaptation dynamics that do not emerge in previous models focusing only on the gene shuffling effect of transformation at multiple loci. We demonstrate how spatial restriction on population growth and DNA diffusion in the environment affect the impact of transformation on adaptation. We found that in structured bacterial populations intermediate DNA diffusion rates predominantly cause transformation to impede adaptation by spreading deleterious alleles in the population.
Overall, our model highlights distinctive evolutionary consequences of bacterial transformation in spatially restricted compared to planktonic bacterial populations.
Bacterial populations often live in highly structured and dense populations, known as biofilms, in nature . Biofilms are stable assemblages of bacterial cells that stick to a surface and are embedded in a self-secreted matrix [1–3]. The proximity between cells is advantageous to the bacteria as it allows them to respond to environmental stresses more effectively, coordinate their behavior better and gain access to nutrients and public goods. The proximity can, however, be disadvantageous as it intensifies the competition for nutrients and other resources between the bacteria [2, 4].
In natural habitats, formation of structured bacterial communities can occur concurrently with colonization of new environments and bacterial adaptation. In the course of colonization, bacteria may be under natural selection to adapt to their new environments. One way in which the necessary genetic variation for natural selection to act upon can be generated is natural transformation, the active uptake of naked DNA fragments from the environment and their subsequent integration into the genome. Natural transformation has been reported in many species of bacteria, including some important pathogens like Streptococcus pneumoniae and Helicobacter pylori.
There is growing evidence that biofilm formation and natural transformation are interconnected processes reviewed in . The physical proximity of bacteria in space seems to facilitate horizontal gene transfer between them, as shown in S. pneumoniae and H. pylori. Further, protein factors that induce natural transformation were found to also trigger biofilm formation, leading to an increased rate of transformation in the biofilm compared to the planktonic state in naturally transforming bacteria [9–11]. Finally, extracellular DNA is known to be abundant in biofilms and also to be involved in biofilm formation [12, 13].
Transformation has the potential to facilitate adaptation, owing to the creation of co-adapted combinations of genes [14–18] but also the acquisition of beneficial genes. However, some hypotheses for the evolution of natural transformation emphasize physiological advantages to transformation and regard any genetic effect as the by-product of these physiological benefits [19, 20]. Natural transformation can also become costly depending on the composition of DNA fragments in the environment [15, 21]: while acquiring new genes can enhance the fitness of the adapting bacteria, transformation with defective DNA that originate from bacteria that are selected against by natural selection can impede adaptation. The interplay between costs and benefits of transformation and bacterial adaptation has been investigated in some previous studies [15, 21, 22]. These studies, however, assumed that bacteria live in a planktonic state, and therefore, neglected the effect of spatial structure of bacterial populations. Since spatial restriction on population growth limits the availability of free DNA to bacteria, we expect the impact of transformation on population dynamics to be different in spatially restricted compared to the planktonic populations.
To study the connection between transformation with external DNA and structured population growth in bacteria, we developed a mathematical model for adaptation of a bacterial population during growth across space. The bacterial population was assumed to undergo transformation with DNA fragments released by dead bacteria. This eco-evolutionary model incorporates several ecological and population genetic factors, such as bacterial migration and DNA diffusion, that govern the rate of both population expansion and adaptation in space. We demonstrate how the impact of transformation on adaptation varies in different parts of a growing population, depending on DNA diffusion, bacterial migration and the source of free DNA in the environment.
The dynamics of bacterial growth and DNA diffusion
Adaptation with constant selection
In the Appendix, we present the results of the simulations in the presence of different levels of DNA degradation. Our results demonstrate that DNA degradation monotonically reduces the bad genes effect but a relatively high DNA decay rate (greater than 1/100 of the bacteria growth rate) is required to completely remove the effect of transformation (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Thus, the dynamics of transformation mentioned above are conceivable to be observed in natural circumstances.
Adaptation with density-dependent selection
Competition between two species
Lysed bacteria are known to supply the free DNA pool in the environment [7, 23–25]. This is thought to give rise to the “bad genes effect” of natural transformation, according to which there is an overrepresentation of deleterious mutations released by selectively dead cells into the DNA pool. Previous models of planktonic bacteria considering the dynamics of a free DNA pool have shown that this effect results in a fitness cost of natural transformation that often overcomes potential benefits of transformation [16, 21]. Our model shows that spatial structure of bacterial populations in combination with DNA diffusion strongly affects the bad genes effect. Specifically, we found that the bad genes effect is mostly mitigated for intermediate bacterial migration and either very high or low DNA diffusion rates.
Our model rests on the assumption that the genetic composition of the DNA fragment pool can be different from that of the cell population. This is justified because free DNA is known to persist in the environment for long periods of time and can thus to some extent retain a record of genes from previous generations . In a spatial context, this also means that DNA diffusion has the potential to disseminate genes within the population, thereby enabling gene flow without actual bacterial migration. However, DNA diffusion may be restricted to varying degrees. For instance, extracellular DNA is known to serve as an abundant structural polymer in biofilms and to be required for the integrity and stability of the extracellular matrix during biofilm formation [12, 13]. Besides, bacteria can utilize free DNA as a potential nutrient [20, 26]. These and other factors can potentially limit the diffusion of free DNA in the environment, localize the effect of transformation and consequently reduce the extent to which transformation increases the level of genotypic homogeneity across the population.
Beyond a transient effect of slowing down adaptation, transformation may also lead to a persistent reduction in mean fitness of the population when there is spatial heterogeneity, caused by the biofilm structure, in selection pressure. One possible scenario that we examined assumes that selection for an allele becomes weaker or even negative at the center of a growing population. A case in point is the situation seen in biofilms where bacteria in the interior are often immune to the action of antibiotics (due to low accessibility of antibiotics  or reduced metabolism caused by nutrients depletion [28, 29]), so that resistance genes are only selected for at the exterior of the biofilm. Such heterogeneous selection can entail a migration load, i.e. a reduction in the mean fitness of the population due to migration of non-adapted individuals. Our results show that transformation can produce an additional fitness load incurred through incorporating DNA that has diffused from parts of the population that are under a different selection pressure.
We also explored a situation where transformation can become beneficial during adaptation due to the acquisition of free DNA fragments originating from other, already adapted populations in the environment. For example, consider a situation where a pathogen invades and adapts to a complex environment like the nasopharynx where the pathogen needs to compete with other bacteria and is exposed to environmental stresses, such as drug treatment. Our results suggest that in a multispecies environment transformation becomes advantageous by allowing bacteria to take advantage of the exogenous DNA in the shared DNA pool that originated from already adapted species. In line with this, prior studies have shown that the rate of transformation increases during colonization of the nasopharynx by multiple strains of pneumococci [30, 31]. This effect of free DNA originating from already adapted populations resembles the proposed benefit of transformation in using beneficial genes that the DNA pool retains from the past (‘the genetic time travel effect’) . Similarly, Szollosi et al.  suggested that horizontal gene transfer through bacterial migration may be beneficial by enabling bacteria to acquire genes from other spatially distinct populations to readapt faster to changing conditions.
Our model does not include evolution at multiple loci, and therefore, does not involve any potential benefit of transformation due to the break up of non-random associations between alleles. Recombination can be beneficial during adaptation by bringing together beneficial mutations that are likely to arise on different backgrounds in finite populations (the Fisher-Muller effect) [34, 35]. Martens and Hallatschek  showed that recombination accelerates adaptation in spatially structured populations through the Fisher-Muller effect, but their model did not incorporate a free DNA pool. As an additional feature of bacterial recombination, our results suggest that transformation with the free DNA pool potentially affects the fixation of beneficial alleles in structured populations. These findings highlight the importance of considering the dynamics of the free DNA pool to fully account for the dynamics of recombination in bacteria.
It should be noted that in our simulations we neglected the possibility that genes involved in DNA uptake and recombination themselves are subject to homologous recombination. In particular, transformation with non-functional alleles of such genes released into the environment by the non-competent bacteria will produce a self-reinforcing drive against transformation so that in the absence of any benefits of transformation the competent genotype will ultimately become extinct .
Although our model aims to provide insights into the dynamics of spatially structured bacterial populations undergoing transformation, our model is not specifically tailored to describe bacterial biofilms. Several previous models provide a much more realistic description of biofilm growth. For example, these models explicitly track the concentration of different nutrients and growth limiting/stimulating compounds in different layers of the biofilm and account for heterogeneity in position, biophysical and physiological properties of bacteria during biofilm formation over time see  for a review. Incorporating evolutionary dynamics such as those involving natural transformation into such individual-based biofilm models represents a substantial conceptual and computational challenge for future studies.
This study was an attempt to elucidate the connection between horizontal gene transfer and formation of structured population in bacteria. There is growing interest among molecular microbiologists to understand this connection as researchers have realized that most bacteria live in highly structured populations and horizontal gene transfer plays a major role in determining the biological repertoire of microorganisms. Experimental tests of the above models are needed to gain a better understanding of the evolutionary dynamics of bacteria during colonization of new environments.
In order to model evolution in a spatially structured population of bacteria, we consider a two-dimensional L × P grid of cells. In each of these grid cells, the bacteria grow at a growth rate r that is restricted by the same carrying capacity K. The bacteria migrate to adjacent grid cells at a rate v, and we consider all bacteria in the 8-cell neighborhood as adjacent. There is no migration beyond the borders of the grid.
We assume each bacterium has a single locus with two alleles (0 and 1) and the bacteria undergo forward (1 → 0) and backward (0 → 1) mutations at the same rate μ. The bacteria die at a certain rate that depends on their allelic state (see below). Upon death, each bacterium releases its genomic allele into the medium (initially the same subpopulation). In the main text, we assume that DNA persists in the environment (no degradation) but may diffuse between grid cells at a rate g. In contrast to bacterial migration, we assume that the DNA may diffuse out of the grid of subpopulations.
The bacteria undergo natural transformation at a rate u per bacterium and encounter DNA molecules present in the same grid cell. An imported DNA fragment replaces the genomic allele through homologous recombination. This may lead to the conversion of a genotype to the other type (provided the allele that is taken up is different from the original one), and it also leads to a reduction of fragments in the pool of free DNA. Besides DNA diffusion and transformation, other environmental factors can limit the availability of environmental DNA, such as DNA degradation and DNA consumption by bacteria as a nutrient (see Discussion). To account for this, we include a rate - c - at which DNA becomes unavailable to the bacteria. The effect of this parameter is studied in the Appendix.
In these equations, x and d denote the number of bacteria and DNA fragments, respectively. Subscripts indicate the grid cell and superscripts indicate the allelic state. The term N(i, j) denotes the set of neighboring grid cells of the grid cell with the coordinates i and j and the term n(i, j) represents the number of these neighboring grid cells (i.e., n(i, j) = |N(i, j)|).
Natural selection operates through differences in death rates between the two bacterial genotypes. The total death rate is composed of an intrinsic death rate m that is the same for all bacteria and a selection coefficient that can depend on both genotype and population density. Specifically, we consider two different selection regimes. In the first regime, the allele 0 entails a death rate that is increased by a constant amount s. Although genotype 0 may still grow and establish a population, selection thus reduces the net growth rate of genotype 0 (r-m-s) by an amount s compared to the favoured genotype 1. Moreover, selection also decreases the equilibrium population size of genotype 0 (K(r-m-s)/r vs. K(r-m)/r).
Parameters used in the model
L and P
Numbers of grid cells in two dimensional space
Carrying capacity of each grid cell
Per bacterium per unit time
Per bacterium per unit time
Intrinsic death rate
Per bacterium per unit time
Per bacterium per DNA fragment per unit time
Bacterial migration rate
Per bacterium per unit time
DNA diffusion rate
Per DNA fragment per unit time
Per bacterium per unit time
DNA decay rate
Per DNA fragment per unit time
We chose a realistic range of parameters for the parameters that can be approximated experimentally, like the mutation and recombination rate. For other parameters, such as the rates of DNA diffusion and bacterial migration in a biofilm for which there are no exact experimental estimates, the parameter space was screened. We assumed a mutation rate of 10-6. For the transformation rate, there is wide variation in experimentally approximated transformation frequencies (10-6-10-3 for H. pylori and 10-6-10-2 for Streptococcus pneumonia). Here we used transformation rate of 10-3-10-5 (per bacterium per DNA fragment per unit time) in most simulations. We also studied the effect of higher transformation rates in some simulations.
We examined the impact of transformation on adaptation in the course of colonization of a new environment. The initial bacterium had the genotype “0”. We then followed the eco-evolutionary dynamics by numerically solving the above system of equations using the software package Mathematica v.8 (Wolfram Research Inc. ).
We would like to thank Alex Hall and Samuel Tazzyman for helpful comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. PZ00P3_132934).
- Costerton W, Veeh R, Shirtliff M, Pasmore M, Post C, Ehrlich G: The application of biofilm science to the study and control of chronic bacterial infections. J Clin Invest. 2003, 112 (10): 1466-1477. 10.1172/JCI200320365.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P: Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004, 2 (2): 95-108. 10.1038/nrmicro821.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rendueles O, Ghigo JM: Multi-species biofilms: how to avoid unfriendly neighbors. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2012, 36 (5): 972-989.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fux CA, Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Stoodley P: Survival strategies of infectious biofilms. Trends Microbiol. 2005, 13 (1): 34-40. 10.1016/j.tim.2004.11.010.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vos M: Why do bacteria engage in homologous recombination?. Trends Microbiol. 2009, 17 (6): 226-232. 10.1016/j.tim.2009.03.001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Madsen JS, Burmolle M, Hansen LH, Sorensen SJ: The interconnection between biofilm formation and horizontal gene transfer. Fems Immunol Med Mic. 2012, 65 (2): 183-195. 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2012.00960.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marks LR, Reddinger RM, Hakansson AP: High levels of genetic recombination during nasopharyngeal carriage and biofilm formation in streptococcus pneumoniae. Mbio. 2012, 3 (5): e00200-12.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Grande R, Di Campli E, Di Bartolomeo S, Verginelli F, Di Giulio M, Baffoni M, Bessa LJ, Cellini L: Helicobacter pylori biofilm: a protective environment for bacterial recombination. J Appl Microbiol. 2012, 113 (3): 669-676. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05351.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Molin S, Tolker-Nielsen T: Gene transfer occurs with enhanced efficiency in biofilms and induces enhanced stabilisation of the biofilm structure. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2003, 14 (3): 255-261. 10.1016/S0958-1669(03)00036-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li YH, Lau PC, Lee JH, Ellen RP, Cvitkovitch DG: Natural genetic transformation of Streptococcus mutans growing in biofilms. J Bacteriol. 2001, 183 (3): 897-908. 10.1128/JB.183.3.897-908.2001.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Petersen FC, Tao L, Scheie AA: DNA binding-uptake system: a link between cell-to-cell communication and biofilm formation. J Bacteriol. 2005, 187 (13): 4392-4400. 10.1128/JB.187.13.4392-4400.2005.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Matsukawa M, Greenberg EP: Putative exopolysaccharide synthesis genes influence Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186 (14): 4449-4456. 10.1128/JB.186.14.4449-4456.2004.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Whitchurch CB, Tolker-Nielsen T, Ragas PC, Mattick JS: Extracellular DNA required for bacterial biofilm formation. Science. 2002, 295 (5559): 1487-10.1126/science.295.5559.1487.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cohen E, Kessler DA, Levine H: Recombination dramatically speeds up evolution of finite populations. Phys Rev Lett. 2005, 94 (9): 098102-PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moradigaravand D, Engelstädter J: The evolution of natural competence: disentangling costs and benefits of sex in bacteria. Am Nat. 2013, 182 (4): E112-126. 10.1086/671909.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moradigaravand D, Engelstädter J: The effect of bacterial recombination on adaptation on fitness landscapes with limited peak accessibility. Plos Comput Biol. 2012, 8 (10): e1002735-10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002735.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Levin BR, Cornejo OE: The population and evolutionary dynamics of homologous gene recombination in bacteria. Plos Genet. 2009, 5 (8): e1000601-10.1371/journal.pgen.1000601.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wylie CS, Trout AD, Kessler DA, Levine H: Optimal strategy for competence differentiation in bacteria. Plos Genet. 2010, 6 (9): e1001108-10.1371/journal.pgen.1001108.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Michod RE, Bernstein H, Nedelcu AM: Adaptive value of sex in microbial pathogens. Infect Genet Evol. 2008, 8 (3): 267-285. 10.1016/j.meegid.2008.01.002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Redfield RJ: Do bacteria have sex?. Nat Rev Genet. 2001, 2 (8): 634-639. 10.1038/35084593.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Redfield RJ: Evolution of bacterial transformation - is sex with dead cells ever better than no sex at all. Genetics. 1988, 119 (1): 213-221.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Redfield RJ, Schrag MR, Dean AM: The evolution of bacterial transformation: sex with poor relations. Genetics. 1997, 146 (1): 27-38.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Nielsen KM, Johnsen PJ, Bensasson D, Daffonchio D: Release and persistence of extracellular DNA in the environment. Environ Biosafety Res. 2007, 6 (1–2): 37-53.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lewis K: Programmed death in bacteria. Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR. 2000, 64 (3): 503-514. 10.1128/MMBR.64.3.503-514.2000.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mortier-Barriere I, de Saizieu A, Claverys JP, Martin B: Competence-specific induction of recA is required for full recombination proficiency during transformation in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Mol Microbiol. 1998, 27 (1): 159-170. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00668.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Finkel SE, Kolter R: DNA as a nutrient novel role for bacterial competence gene homologs. J Bacteriol. 2001, 183 (21): 6288-6293. 10.1128/JB.183.21.6288-6293.2001.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Anderl JN, Franklin MJ, Stewart PS: Role of antibiotic penetration limitation in Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm resistance to ampicillin and ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000, 44 (7): 1818-1824. 10.1128/AAC.44.7.1818-1824.2000.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Anderl JN, Zahller J, Roe F, Stewart PS: Role of nutrient limitation and stationary-phase existence in Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm resistance to ampicillin and ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003, 47 (4): 1251-1256. 10.1128/AAC.47.4.1251-1256.2003.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gilbert P, Collier PJ, Brown MR: Influence of growth rate on susceptibility to antimicrobial agents: biofilms, cell cycle, dormancy, and stringent response. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990, 34 (10): 1865-1868. 10.1128/AAC.34.10.1865.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Donkor ES, Bishop CJ, Antonio M, Wren B, Hanage WP: High levels of recombination among Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates from the Gambia. Mbio. 2011, 2 (3): e00040-11.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leung MHY, Oriyo NM, Gillespie SH, Charalambous BM: The adaptive potential during nasopharyngeal colonisation of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Infect Genet Evol. 2011, 11 (8): 1989-1995. 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.09.002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Engelstädter J, Moradigaravand D: Adaptation through genetic time travel? Fluctuating selection can drive the evolution of bacterial transformation. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2014, 281 (1775): 20132609-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Szollosi GJ, Derenyi I, Vellai T: The maintenance of sex in bacteria is ensured by its potential to reload genes. Genetics. 2006, 174 (4): 2173-2180. 10.1534/genetics.106.063412.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Muller HJ: Some genetic aspects of sex. Am Nat. 1932, 66: 118-138. 10.1086/280418.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fisher RA: The Genetical Theory Of Natural Selection. 1930, USA: Oxford University PressView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Erik A: Interfering waves of adaptation promote spatial mixing. Martens and Oskar Hallatschek Genet. 2011, 189 (3): 1045-1060. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.130112. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3213383/Google Scholar
- Redfield RJ: Genes for breakfast: the have-your-cake-and-eat-it-too of bacterial transformation. J Hered. 1993, 84 (5): 400-404.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kreft JU, Picioreanu C, Wimpenny JWT, van Loosdrecht MCM: Individual-based modelling of biofilms. Microbiol-Sgm. 2001, 147: 2897-2912.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang Y, Roos KP, Taylor DE: Transformation of Helicobacter pylori by chromosomal metronidazole resistance and by a plasmid with a selectable chloramphenicol resistance marker. J Gen Microbiol. 1993, 139 (10): 2485-2493. 10.1099/00221287-139-10-2485.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Evans BA, Rozen DE: Significant variation in transformation frequency in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Isme J. 2013, 7 (4): 791-799. 10.1038/ismej.2012.170.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wolfram Research, Inc: Mathematica, Version 8.0. 2010, Champaign, ILGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.