Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Integrating coalescent species delimitation with analysis of host specificity reveals extensive cryptic diversity despite minimal mitochondrial divergence in the malaria parasite genus Leucocytozoon

BMC Evolutionary Biology201818:128

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-018-1242-x

  • Received: 26 March 2018
  • Accepted: 15 August 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Coalescent methods that use multi-locus sequence data are powerful tools for identifying putatively reproductively isolated lineages, though this approach has rarely been used for the study of microbial groups that are likely to harbor many unrecognized species. Among microbial symbionts, integrating genetic species delimitation methods with trait data that could indicate reproductive isolation, such as host specificity data, has rarely been used despite its potential to inform species limits. Here we test the ability of an integrative approach combining genetic and host specificity data to delimit species within the avian malaria parasite genus Leucocytozoon in central Alaska.

Results

We sequenced seven nuclear loci for 69 Leucocytozoon samples and used multiple species delimitation methods (GMYC and BPP models), tested for differences in host infection patterns among putative species based on 406 individual infections, and characterized parasite morphology. We found that cryptic morphology has masked a highly diverse Leucocytozoon assemblage, with most species delimitation methods recovering support for at least 21 separate species that occur sympatrically and have divergent host infection patterns. Reproductive isolation among putative species appears to have evolved despite low mtDNA divergence, and in one instance two Leucocytozoon cytb haplotypes that differed by a single base pair (~ 0.2% divergence) were supported as separate species. However, there was no consistent association between mtDNA divergence and species limits. Among cytb haplotypes that differed by one to three base pairs we observed idiosyncratic patterns of nuclear and ecological divergence, with cytb haplotype pairs found to be either conspecific, reproductively isolated with no divergence in host specificity, or reproductively isolated with divergent patterns of host specialization.

Conclusion

Integrating multi-locus genetic species delimitation methods and non-traditional ecological data types such as host specificity provide a novel view of the diversity of avian malaria parasites that has been missed previously using morphology and mtDNA barcodes. Species delimitation methods show that Leucocytozoon is highly species-rich in Alaska, and the genus is likely to harbor extraordinary species-level diversity worldwide. Integrating genetic and ecological data will be an important approach for understanding the diversity and evolutionary history of microbial symbionts moving forward.

Keywords

  • Avian malaria
  • BPP
  • Cryptic species
  • GMYC
  • Haemosporida
  • UniFrac

Background

The recent rise in methods to discover and delimit species using multi-locus sequence data under the multi-species coalescent model [1] has given promise to the goal of identifying and characterizing each leaf on the tree of life. Coalescent species delimitation methods have been successfully applied across a broad array of taxa, particularly vertebrates [25] and insects [6, 7], though much less often to groups such as microbial symbionts that may be highly diverse yet understudied [8, 9]. Species delimitation has particular relevance for microbial parasites, as infectious diseases often emerge from pathogenic groups for which species limits or evolutionary diversity is poorly known [1012].

Species delimitation of microorganisms is challenged by a preponderance of cryptic diversity, as microbes typically have limited or highly labile morphological variation that is difficult to characterize using microscopic tools [1316]. Ecological traits, however, may inform species limits when morphology is not available or reliable [17, 18]. In parasitic groups, for instance, statistical estimates of host specificity that capture variation in parasite abundance across the phylogenetic diversity of hosts are potentially informative for species delimitation. As host specificity can act as an ecological filter to determine whether parasites have the potential to interact and reproduce with one another, the finding that closely related parasites infect mutually exclusive host groups can provide evidence for the existence of reproductively isolated evolutionary lineages.

The blood parasites in the order Haemosporida, often referred to as the ‘malaria parasites’ are a globally abundant lineage of vertebrate parasites. At least four genera of haemosporidian - Haemoproteus, Leucocytozoon, Parahaemoproteus, and Plasmodium –are common and diverse in birds [19, 20], though within these genera species limits are notoriously complex and poorly understood [13, 21, 22]. The avian malaria parasites have become an emerging model system to study the ecology and evolution of host-parasite interactions [2325], yet their utility as a study system has been severely limited by a lack of consensus regarding species limits within the four genera. The ability to delimit species of avian malaria parasite is fundamental to inferences regarding ecological processes, such as community assembly [26, 27], as well as macroevolutionary processes such as diversification dynamics (e.g. host-switching vs. cospeciation; [28, 29]).

Two competing and highly divergent paradigms have dominated our understanding of species limits within the avian haemosporidians. Traditionally, several hundred avian haemosporidian species were described using morphology as observed under the light microscope, with host species used as a character to distinguish morphologically similar parasites under an assumption of strict host specificity [30, 31]. The rise of genetic research on avian malaria parasites has challenged the morphological species (morphospecies) concept, as the development and wide adoption of cytochrome b (cytb) as a DNA barcoding locus has revealed extreme mitochondrial diversity that is suggestive of the existence of numerous cryptic species [13, 23, 32]. The focus on using mtDNA barcodes has been driven in large part by previous studies that have found that even minute differences between haemosporidian cytb sequences can be used to delimit evolutionarily independent lineages, as haemosporidians have been shown to exhibit slow rates of mitochondrial evolution [33, 34]. For example, the highly influential study by Bensch et al. [13] found that in some instances a single base pair difference could be used to delimit species within the genus Haemoproteus (Parahaemoproteus), which has since been adopted as a general rule in many studies for delimiting putative haemosporidian species (e.g. [3537]).

Using additional data types and models of species delimitation as an alternative to the morphospecies and barcode-based haemosporidian delimitation hypotheses has the potential to vastly improve our understanding of haemosporidian species limits. In particular, methods that use multi-locus sequence data and implement the multi-species coalescent model [1, 38] offer the promise of a statistical framework with which to identify reproductively isolated lineages. Coalescent methods are capable of identifying and assigning probabilities to lineages that show evidence of reproductive isolation; when applied to lineages that occur sympatrically and vary in some readily quantified ecological trait (e.g. host specificity), it is possible to capture a more nuanced view of species divergence than coarse morphology or DNA barcodes provide.

The avian malaria genus Leucocytozoon is of particular interest for studies of haemosporidian species limits, as species richness estimates for this genus differ dramatically between the morphospecies and mtDNA barcode hypotheses. Three morphospecies, Leucocytozoon fringillinarum, L. majoris, and L. dubreuili are abundant and widespread parasites of songbird (order Passeriformes) hosts in North America [31, 39]. In contrast, cytb surveys in North America have revealed genetically diverse Leucocytozoon communities infecting single host species or found in single sampling sites (e.g. 47 haplotypes [40], 19 haplotypes [41], 12 haplotypes [42]). Applying the morphospecies versus mtDNA barcode delimitations suggest vastly different estimates for Leucocytozoon species diversity, yet no study has tested species limits in this genus using additional data types.

Here, we use an integrative approach combining multi-locus nuclear sequence data, coalescent models of species delimitation, ecological host infection data, and morphology to conduct the first test of species limits across an entire avian haemosporidian assemblage and the first test of species limits within Leucocytozoon. We find that both traditional morphospecies delimitations and DNA barcodes fail to accurately capture species limits in this system, with model-based delimitation methods recovering support for at least 21 Leucocytozoon species across the study area. Analysis of host specificity shows that putative species are generally differentiated in their patterns of host infection, suggesting that statistical patterns of host associations should be considered an important component of integrative taxonomy of microbial symbionts in future research.

Methods

Sample collection

We isolated Leucocytozoon parasites from 381 songbird (order Passeriformes) host tissues (blood and liver) from six sites in central Alaska (Fig. 1, Additional file 1: Table S1) that are accessioned in the Ambrose Monell Cryo Collection (AMCC) at the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH; Additional file 1: Table S1). All host individuals from which tissues were sampled were collected and prepared as vouchered study specimens at the AMNH following humane euthanasia according to standard practices for the collection of wild birds [43] and following approval from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the AMNH and permitted by State of Alaska Department of Fish and Game Scientific (permits 16–013 and 17–092). Blood smears were prepared at the time of collection for a subset of samples that were used for morphological study of Leucocytozoon. All samples were stored at − 20 C in RNALater until DNA extraction using Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue kits.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Summary of species delimitation results. Shown is a seven-gene phylogeny estimated in BEAST using the partitioned nuclear sequence, a strict molecular clock, and coalescent prior. To the left of the phylogeny are images of the three morphospecies found in this study and a map of the sites where all samples were collected generated using the ggmap package in R with the “get_googlemap()” function. Columns to the right of the phylogeny are the morphospecies for each sample (where available), and the results of four species delimitation methods: the A11 algorithm of BPP, single-threshold GMYC, bGMYC, and multiple-threshold GMYC. If multiple samples were supported by a species delimitation method to represent the same species, that putative species is represented in a unique color in a rectangle separated from other species. Haplotype names for each sample (or group of samples) are shown; where species delimitation methods recovered multiple haplotypes as the same species, the most common haplotype of the group is given first. Note that haplotypes CATUST09 and TUMIG15 were not included in the BPP analyses and so are not depicted in the column for BPP

Molecular methods

Cytochrome b (cytb) barcode sequences have become the standard marker to characterize avian haemosporidian diversity [23], and so we used Leucocytozoon cytb haplotypes as the unit of study for tests of species limits using multi-locus sequence data (detailed below). We used the established haemosporidian cytb barcode primers (NFI/NR3 and FL/R2L [23, 44]) to screen all sampled hosts for Leucocytozoon and sequence positive infections. Infections with multiple haemosporidian cytb haplotypes can be common in avian communities [40, 45], and so we used a strict multi-step approach to identify host tissue samples that contained a single Leucocytozoon mitochondrial haplotype to be used for downstream species delimitation analyses (outlined in detail in Additional file 1: Supplementary Methods). Briefly, we used a PCR protocol that was modified from [44] by decreasing the annealing temperature and extending the annealing time to increase the chance of amplifying all mtDNA sequences present within a sample. Amplified products were directly sequenced on an ABI 3730 machine and the resulting chromatograms were assessed for signatures of overlapping sequence peaks indicative of multiple parasite haplotypes within the sample. Any samples that showed clear signatures of containing multiple cytb haplotypes were removed, and any samples for which the signal was unclear were re-sequenced and removed if evidence of multiple sequence peaks remained. Only sequences that exhibited a single chromatogram trace across all 479 base pairs with strong signal were analyzed further with multi-locus data. All sequences were edited using Geneious v8.0.5. Based on standard practice, all cytb haplotypes were assigned a unique name that was used for downstream analyses. If the cytb haplotype had been previously recorded in the MalAvi database [23], we used the previously assigned name for consistency. If the haplotype was new, we followed standards in the field and assigned it a new name based on the first host it was found within (e.g. the first Leucocytozoon haplotype from the host Acanthis flammea was named ACAFLA01).

We amplified partial sequences of seven nuclear protein-coding genes (ATPase2, RPB1, POLD1, KPNB1, PRPF6, SEC24a, SF3B1; Additional file 1: Table S2) for each single-infection sample using Leucocytozoon-specific nested primer pairs that were designed based on sequence data from [20, 46]. We amplified and sequenced all loci following [20], incorporating 5′ tags (CAG and M13R) in the second round of amplification for sequencing as described above. We examined nuclear sequences for overlapping peaks on sequence chromatograms as we did above for cytb sequences to detect any mixed infections that may have been missed by cytb sequencing due to PCR amplification bias. However, we did not universally discard all nuclear sequences that exhibited overlapping chromatogram peaks. We retained samples that exhibited a proportion of polymorphic sites across nuclear genes that was comparable with previously published estimates of pairwise nucleotide diversity between isolates within malaria parasite populations. This was done to distinguish nuclear variation occurring among multiple genetic clones of the same mtDNA haplotype, which are often found within infected host individuals [47, 48], from nuclear variation between putatively different species (see Additional file 1: Supplementary Methods for details). Lastly, we conducted BLAST searches on all nuclear sequences to identify and remove accidental amplifications of the avian malaria genera Parahaemoproteus or Plasmodium. In total, 69 samples exhibited consistent signatures of containing a single Leucocytozoon lineage across all eight loci (cytb and seven nuclear loci). These samples were retained for species delimitation analyses.

Morphology

We scanned all available blood smears from single infection samples for Leucocytozoon at 200X across 50 fields and recorded the morphotype of all Leucocytozoon parasites that were observed. Following the descriptions in [31], we classified each parasite as belonging to the L. fringillinarum, L. majoris, or L. dubreuili morphospecies (no other morphospecies were observed).

Phylogenetic analyses

We estimated Bayesian and maximum likelihood phylogenies for all single-infection Leucocytozoon samples using the full nuclear (seven gene) dataset implemented in BEAST v1.8 [49]. We used jModelTest 2 [50] to estimate the best-fit substitution model for each locus, and implemented a strict molecular clock and coalescent tree prior for 30 million generations, discarding the first 10% as burn-in. We used Tracer v1.6 [51] to ensure all parameters reached sufficient ESS values. We also estimated a maximum likelihood phylogeny using RAxML 8.2.3 [52], implementing the GTRGAMMA substitution model and rapid bootstrapping. All analyses used the Parahaemoproteus cytb haplotype SPIARB01 as the outgroup. As the use of the outgroup introduced gaps in several alignments (particularly in RPB1), we used the program Gblocks [53] to eliminate gaps and poorly aligned regions prior to analysis. Haplotype networks for individual nuclear loci were visualized using the TCS algorithm [54] implemented in PopART [55].

Species delimitation analyses

We used two species delimitation approaches to test species limits among the sampled cytb haplotypes, as each method implements different assumptions about the speciation process and thus we sought to test for consensus across different methodologies [56]. First, we used the single- and multiple-threshold generalized mixed Yule coalescent model (GMYC; [6, 57]) using the R package splits [58]. The GMYC model integrates the Yule and coalescent models to identify the branching pattern threshold point between speciation (Yule) and population genetic (coalescent) processes, and is ideal for our dataset that is unbalanced with respect to sampling within and between different Leucocytozoon cytb haplotypes (e.g. some haplotypes were sampled multiple times, while others are represented as singletons; [59]). We also used the Bayesian implementation of the GMYC model, bGMYC [60], which accounts for uncertainty in branch lengths and tree topology by sampling from the posterior distribution of trees. We conducted eight separate GMYC analyses: one analysis using trees estimated for each nuclear locus, as well as an analysis using a tree estimated from a concatenated analysis of all seven nuclear loci. For single-locus analyses we generated ultrametric gene trees as input for GMYC analysis using BEAST v1.8, implementing identical parameters as described for the concatenated analysis and as suggested by [59]. The analysis using the tree estimated from the concatenated alignment was performed due to varying proportions of missing data in each individual nuclear gene alignment; although the GMYC model was designed as a species delimitation tool for single-locus barcode datasets, there is no inherent limitation to the model that precludes it from being used on concatenated datasets [58]. The outgroup and identical sequences were removed prior to all GMYC analyses. For bGMYC analyses, we ran MCMC chains for 50,000 generations per tree on 100 topologies from the posterior distribution of the BEAST analysis, discarding the first 50% of steps as burn-in for each tree with a thinning of 100.

We also conducted joint species delimitation and species tree estimation using the A11 algorithm in the program BPP v3.3 [61]. This program uses a Bayesian framework and the multispecies coalescent model to account for gene tree-species tree conflict due to incomplete lineage sorting [6264]. We conducted BPP analyses separately on two Leucocytozoon clades to avoid problems caused by model misspecification among distantly related lineages. Pairwise cytb divergence was an average of 4.1% and 3.9% within the two clades, respectively, while average divergence between clades was 8%. Two divergent cytb haplotypes, CATUST09 and TUMIG15, differed by at least 5.8% and 6.8%, respectively, from all other haplotypes and so were not included in BPP analyses to avoid model misspecification. As a primary goal of this study was to test whether all haemosporidian cytb haplotypes represent reproductively isolated lineages, we set all cytb haplotypes as unique populations in BPP analyses, as BPP will attempt to lump populations into species but will not split populations [61]. We retained all singleton cytb haplotypes for these analyses (i.e. haplotypes that were represented by one sample), as BPP has been shown to be robust to the inclusion of species represented by a single individual [65]. Following standard approaches [16, 66] we conducted four BPP analyses using different combinations of diffuse population size (θ) and divergence time (τ) priors to evaluate the sensitivity of analyses to variation in these parameters. All priors were set as gamma distributions (α, β) with mean α/β and variance α/β2. We conducted analyses using (α, β): 1) large population size (1, 10) and large divergence time (1, 10); 2) large population size (1, 10) and small divergence time (1, 1000); 3) small population size (1, 1000) and large divergence time (1, 10); and 4) small population size (1, 1000) and small divergence time (1, 1000). Each analysis was run twice using different seeds to test for variation among runs. We ran each analysis for 250,000 generations, sampling every 5 generations and using a burn-in of 10% All analyses were run using the Gblocks alignments and with the option cleandata = 0.

Host specificity analyses

We sought to use host specificity as an independent data source to test whether Leucocytozoon cytb haplotypes that were identified as reproductively isolated lineages differed in their infection patterns across the host community, as we hypothesized that species-level divergences are associated with ecological divergence in patterns of host use. Though host specificity would ideally be integrated directly with parasite genetic data for species delimitation as has been done previously with morphological data [67], host specificity is not measured as a characteristic of individual parasites (rather it is measured as a characteristic of parasite populations). An additional challenge is that while several commonly used metrics for parasite host specificity are capable of quantifying the relative host breadth of a parasite [68, 69], these metrics are not capable of capturing relative differences in the composition of the host community that a parasite infects. For instance, traditional metrics can determine whether two parasite species are host specialists, meaning that they infect a specific phylogenetic subset of the host community, though these methods cannot capture whether the two parasite species are specialized on the same host group or different host groups. To characterize pairwise differences in host specificity among Leucocytozoon cytb haplotypes that also capture differences in infection patterns across the host phylogeny, we calculated the pairwise weighted UniFrac distance [70] using the R package phyloseq [71]. Weighted UniFrac uses a phylogeny as well as species abundances to estimate distances among biological communities. Here, we treated the hosts that are infected by each Leucocytozoon cytb haplotype as “communities” to quantify differences in Leucocytozoon infection patterns across phylogenetic host space. We used the weighted UniFrac distance to account for differences in abundance of parasites across host species, so that rare ‘spillover’ infections into a host in which a parasite cannot complete its lifecycle have less influence than hosts that are frequently infected and ecologically important for the parasite. When calculating pairwise UniFrac distances we considered all detections of each Leucocytozoon cytb haplotype, including those that were found in mixed infections, and the abundance of a host within a parasite’s “host community” was simply the total number of times that host was found to be infected by a given Leucocytozoon cytb haplotype across all 381 host samples. For the host phylogeny we downloaded a distribution of 100 bird phylogenies from www.birdtree.org using the “Ericson all species” option, and used TreeAnnotator v1.8 [49] to produce a single maximum clade credibility tree. We summarized differences in weighted UniFrac distances among cytb haplotypes using principal coordinate analysis implemented in the R package ape [72]. To test whether closely related cytb haplotype pairs (< 2.5% sequence divergence) have more divergent weighted UniFrac distances than expected by chance, we randomized the host-parasite matrix using the “permatfull” function in the R package vegan [73], preserving both column and row totals (fixedmar = “both”). We randomized the matrix 1000 times to generate a null distribution of host-parasite occurrences, and tested whether the observed UniFrac distance between any chosen cytb haplotype pair was significantly higher or lower than expected by chance (p < 0.05 threshold). UniFrac distances were not calculated for Leucocytozoon cytb haplotypes that were only detected once due to insufficient data.

Results

We screened 381 songbird hosts from central Alaska for Leucocytozoon, from which we isolated 69 single-infection samples representing 28 Leucocytozoon cytb haplotypes. These 28 cytb haplotypes served as the basis for further analyses that tested: 1) whether different cytb haplotypes shared nuclear alleles; 2) whether different cytb haplotypes were supported as conspecific or heterospecific using coalescent species delimitation analyses, and 3) whether different cytb haplotypes exhibited significantly different host infection patterns. Of these 28 Leucocytozoon cytb haplotypes, 18 haplotypes were represented by a single sample for species delimitation analyses while the remaining haplotypes were represented by two to ten samples each (Additional file 1: Table S3).

Across all 381 sampled hosts we recorded the 28 target cytb haplotypes a total of 406 times (including both single infections and mixed infections; Additional file 1: Table S3). The 69 samples that were retained for species delimitation were isolated from 21 host species across six sites (Additional file 1: Table S1). Nuclear loci amplified and sequenced with varying success, ranging from 66 (KPNB1) to 39 (SF3B1) samples sequenced per locus (out of 69 total samples; Table 1, see Additional file 1: Table S4 for GenBank accession numbers). We discovered that two samples (PRS4416 haplotype ACAFLA03 and PRS4431 haplotype PERCAN01) exhibited highly heterogeneous divergence from other samples of the same cytb haplotype across nuclear loci, with pairwise divergences among loci varying from 0% to as high as 9.3% (Fig. 2, Additional file 1: Tables S5–6). This signature of high genetic divergence from other samples of the same cytb haplotype at some, but not all, loci suggests that PRS4416 and PRS4431 contained mixed infections that were not seen on sequence chromatograms and so the two samples were removed from further analysis.
Table 1

Nuclear genes sequenced for multi-locus species delimitation in this study

Gene

Aligned length (bp)

Aligned length (bp) no outgroup

N

Model

ATPase2

517

452

63

GTR + I + G

RPB1

1035

854

65

GTR + I + G

POLD1

484

484

54

GTR + I + G

KPBN1

430

430

66

GTR + I + G

PRPF6

530

455

41

HKY + G

SEC24A

628

610

58

GTR + G

SF3B1

388

388

39

HKY + G

Alignment lengths, number of samples that amplified and sequenced successfully, and best fit model of nucleotide substitution as estimated in jModelTest2 for each gene. Alignment lengths differ in some loci with the outgroup removed due to the deletion of gaps

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Nuclear divergence of Leucocytozoon cytb haplotypes. Depicted are five clades that contain pairs of cytb haplotypes that differ by one to three base pairs (as shown in the distance matrices of cytb differences to the right of the networks). In each clade haplotypes are given a different color that corresponds to the haplotype networks. a haplotypes PERCAN01, ACAFLA03, and CATUST14, which differ by one to three bases, are differentiated across all nuclear loci and never share nuclear alleles. The three sequences that are marked by asterisks represent outlier samples of high divergence that were removed prior to species delimitation analysis due to the possibility that they contained mixed infections; b) ROFI06 and LOXLEU05 differ by a single base pair and are weakly differentiated across nuclear loci, sharing nuclear alleles for a single locus; c) ZOLEU02 and ZOLEU04 differ by a single base pair and share alleles across multiple nuclear loci; d) haplotypes CB1, JUNHYE04, CARPUS01, and ACAFLA04 differ by one to three bases, but share alleles across multiple nuclear loci. In addition, haplotype pairs TRPIP2/ACAFLA01 and BT1/PHYBOR01 differ by a single base pair but share nuclear alleles; e) CATUST28 and CATMIN05 differ by two bases but are highly differentiated across all nuclear loci. Note that not all nuclear loci are depicted for each clade due to insufficient sample sizes for some haplotypes

Species delimitation analyses

Species delimitation analyses produced estimates that varied from 19 species (BPP) to 23 species (mGMYC), with sGMYC and bGMYC analyses both recovering support for 21 species (Fig. 1, Additional file 1: Table S7). BPP recovered consistent support for 19 species using different priors (Fig. 3), though note that this analysis excluded haplotypes CATUST09 and TUMIG15, which were recovered as reproductively isolated lineages in all GMYC analyses. Posterior probabilities for BPP delimitations were consistently above 0.95 (17 of 19 delimited species) using a prior that reflects small population size (θ = 1, 1000). Just one putative species consisting of haplotypes ROFI06 and LOXLEU05 was not strongly supported for any combination of BPP priors (posterior probability 0.59–0.86; Fig. 3), though these haplotypes were supported as conspecific in all GMYC analyses. Across the seven nuclear markers that we sequenced for this study, single-threshold GMYC species delimitation estimates varied widely for individual loci (range: 12–21 species, Additional file 1: Table S8), and only a single locus obtained the same number of estimated species as the concatenated dataset (KPBN1, 21 species). Using microscopy we were able to assign 16 of the 28 identified cytb haplotypes to morphological groups (Additional file 2: Figure S1) that matched the previously described morphospecies Leucocytozoon fringillinarum, L. majoris, and L. dubreuili. Samples with L. fringillinarum and L. majoris morphologies each composed large clades that contained multiple putative species that were identified in species delimitation analyses. The L. dubreuili morphotype was found only for cytb haplotype CATMIN01, which was nested within the fringillinarum clade.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Results of BPP species delimitation using the A11 algorithm. Boxes at each node depict the results of the four analyses that were conducted using different diffuse priors for population size and divergence time. If a node was supported to delimit a species with posterior probability > 0.95, the square for that analysis is depicted in blue (squares are depicted in yellow and red for posterior probabilities less than 0.95 and 0.90, respectively). Note that no posterior probabilities are depicted for lineages CATUST09 and TUMIG15, as they were removed from this analysis due to high divergence from all other haplotypes

Association between cytb and nuclear sequence divergence

We focused on the association between mtDNA and nuclear genetic divergence among closely related cytb haplotypes, given previous support for the finding that a single base pair difference (0.2%) between cytb barcodes can signal reproductive isolation among avian haemosporidian lineages [13, 22]. We recovered multi-locus sequence data for 14 pairs of cytb haplotypes (17 total haplotypes) that differed by 0.2–0.6% sequence divergence (one to three base pairs; seven haplotype pairs differed by one base pair, four haplotype pairs differed by two base pairs, and three haplotype pairs differed by three base pairs; Fig. 2, Table 2). We found that in six of seven instances, cytb haplotypes that differed by one base pair were recovered as the same species in all species delimitation analyses and shared alleles for at least one nuclear locus (Table 2). However, one pair of lineages (PERCAN01 and CATUST14) that differed by a single cytb base pair were recovered as different species in all analyses. Furthermore, PERCAN01 and CATUST14 were divergent across all nuclear loci (1.1 to 5.2% pairwise divergence across loci), and never shared nuclear alleles.
Table 2

Summary of genetic and ecological divergence among closely related cytb haplotype pairs

Cytb Haplotype Pair

Cytb Divergence

Share nuclear alleles [N loci]

Nuclear Divergence (%) [Min-Max]

N Analyses delimited as species

UniFrac significant

ZOLEU02/ZOLEU04

1 bp (0.2%)

Yes [3]

0–0.27

0/4

CB1/CARPUS01

1 bp (0.2%)

Yes [5]

0.04–0.66

0/4

CB1/ACAFLA04

1 bp (0.2%)

Yes [2]

0.23–0.66

0/4

BT1/PHYBOR01

1 bp (0.2%)

Yes [5]

0–1.01

0/4

TRPIP2/ACAFLA01

1 bp (0.2%

Yes [4]

0–0.66

0/4

ROFI06/LOXLEU05

1 bp (0.2%)

Yes [1]

0–3.17

0/4

Yes (lower)

PERCAN01/CATUST14

1 bp (0.2%)

No

1.07–5.19

4/4

Yes (higher)

CB1/JUNHYE04

2 bp (0.4%)

Yes [5]

0.03–0.50

0/4

CARPUS01/ACAFLA04

2 bp (0.4%)

Yes [1]

0.48–0.63

0/4

CATUST28/CATMIN05

2 bp (0.4%)

No

1.66–9.51

4/4

No

ACAFLA03/CATUST14

2 bp (0.4%)

No

1.42–4.62

4/4

Yes (higher)

CARPUS01/JUNHYE04

3 bp (0.6%)

Yes [4]

0–0.71

0/4

ACAFLA04/JUNHYE04

3 bp (0.6%)

Yes [1]

0–0.70

0/4

ACAFLA03/PERCAN01

3 bp (0.6%)

No

0.36–4.38

4/4

Yes (higher)

TRPIP2/CB1

5 bp (1%)

No

2.31–7.55

4/4

Yes (higher)

ZOLEU02/CNEORN01

8 bp (1.6%)

No

0.31–8.72

4/4

Yes (higher)

CB1/BT1

9 bp (1.8%)

No

5.74–14.39

4/4

Yes (higher)

TRPIP2/BT1

11 bp (2.2%)

No

5.9–14.7

4/4

Yes (higher)

Shown for each cytb haplotype pair: the number of base pair differences between haplotypes, whether the haplotypes were found to share alleles for at least one nuclear locus, the observed range of pairwise genetic divergence for nuclear loci between the two haplotypes, the number of species delimitation analyses for which the pair was delimited as separate species, and whether the weighted UniFrac distance between them was significantly different (lower or higher than expected by chance; this metric was not able to be calculated for all comparisons due to sample size of one of the haplotypes). The 14 haplotype pairs that are 02–0.6% divergent are depicted in Fig. 4a

Species delimitation and nuclear divergence were inconsistent among cytb haplotypes that differed by two to three base pairs, as some haplotype pairs were recovered as conspecific and shared nuclear alleles while others were delimited as different species and had divergent nuclear sequences (Table 2). There appeared to be strong differences in the association between cytb and nuclear genetic divergence among clades, particularly between the clade composed of CB1, CARPUS01, JUNHYE04, and ACAFLA04 which showed virtually no nuclear divergence among cytb haplotypes that differed by as many as three base pairs and the clade containing the cytb haplotypes ACAFLA03, CATUST14, and PERCAN01 which exhibited as much divergence between cytb haplotypes that differ by one base pair as those that differ by three base pairs (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

The relationship between cytb and nuclear divergence in Leucocytozoon is inconsistent and clade-dependent. a Among 14 pairs of Leucocytozoon cytb haplotypes (17 haplotypes total), the divergence between them is not strongly associated with nuclear divergence for the seven loci sequenced in this study. b The relationship between cytb divergence and nuclear divergence appears to be clade dependent, as the clade consisting of CB1/ACAFLA04/CARPUS01/JUNHYE04 (which were all found to be conspecific) exhibits no association between cytb divergence and nuclear divergence while the clade consisting of ACAFLA03/CATUST14/PERCAN01 exhibits strong nuclear differentiation across the same scale of cytb divergence, though nuclear divergence does not appear to increase with cytb divergence

Host specificity analyses

We used the weighted UniFrac metric to characterize how putative Leucocytozoon species infect the host community while accounting for both host phylogeny and the abundance of parasites across all host species. We restricted host specificity analyses to 18 Leucocytozoon cytb haplotypes that were found to infect at least two host individuals in our sample, with the number of infections per Leucocytozoon cytb haplotype ranging from 2 to 101 host-parasite observations (median 11 infections per cytb haplotype; Additional file 1: Table S3). We found that closely related (< 2.5% sequence divergence) cytb haplotypes that had been supported by species delimitation analyses were generally strongly differentiated in their patterns of host use (Fig. 5). Leucocytozoon cytb haplotypes were largely separated by specificity to host family: 14 cytb haplotypes were found predominantly (> 70% of infections) in one host family, while four cytb haplotypes exhibited generalist strategies where no host family reached 50% of total infections. To test whether cytb haplotypes within the same clade exhibited significantly different patterns of host infection, we conducted pairwise randomization tests of weighted UniFrac distance. We found that the observed UniFrac distance was significantly higher (i.e. host utilization was more divergent) than the randomized distribution (Table 2) in all but two instances. One exception was for the cytb haplotypes CATUST28 and CATMIN05, which were supported as different species in all species delimitation analyses, but were not significantly differentiated in their host infection patterns (p = 0.513). An additional randomization test found that the cytb haplotypes ROFI06 and LOXLEU05 were more similar in host specificity than expected by chance (p = 0.027), though these haplotypes were supported as conspecific in species delimitation analyses.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Patterns of putative Leucocytozoon species infection across host species. a Principal coordinates analysis of weighted UniFrac distances among 18 Leucocytozoon cytb haplotypes that were sampled at least twice across 381 hosts. b Paired histograms of randomized weighted UniFrac distance and barplots demonstrating differential infection across potential host families for closely related cytb haplotype pairs. Vertical lines in histograms depict the observed UniFrac distance for that putative species pair, which is also shown above each histogram with its associated significance value. Colors of the barplots correspond to the host phylogeny shown in the key to the left. UniFrac distances and barplots are depicted in two pairwise matrices for clades that contain three putative species; UniFrac distance is shown below the diagonal for each cytb haplotype pair, while above the diagonal are host infection barplots with the haplotype along the lower diagonal representing the top barplot

Discussion

Morphologically ambiguous complexes of microbial symbionts pose difficult challenges for the identification of species boundaries, though an integrative approach combining coalescent species delimitation methods and ecological data can provide important insights into the diversity of symbiont communities and the complexity of host-symbiont interactions. Here, we applied a suite of coalescent species delimitation methods and analyses of host specialization to test for species limits within an assemblage of morphologically conserved but genetically diverse avian malaria parasites in the genus Leucocytozoon. We found that three abundant morphospecies in central Alaska likely consist of at least 21 reproductively isolated species that vary widely in their interactions with the host community.

Cryptic morphology has masked a diverse Leucocytozoon assemblage

Our analysis provides strong evidence that neither traditional morphospecies concepts nor mtDNA barcodes alone adequately characterize species diversity in Leucocytozoon. First, we show definitively that the morphospecies “L. fringillinarum” and “L. majoris” are not valid species, but rather that each represent a complex of cryptic species with divergent host infection patterns. Previous analyses using mtDNA have found evidence that L. fringillinarum and L. majoris are not monophyletic [74, 75], though this is the first study to rigorously test for species delimitations in this genus using multi-locus data. Morphology did exhibit strong phylogenetic signal, as the fringillinarum and majoris morphotypes each formed clades in which we delimited numerous putative species. Though the dubreuili morphotype was found for a single cytb haplotype in this study, we anticipate that further sampling across the global distribution of this morphotype will also reveal extensive cryptic species-level diversity.

While the evidence from coalescent analyses suggest that there are at least 21 reproductively isolated lineages of Leucocytozoon in central Alaska, it is important to note that the species we delimit here are at this point still putative. One analysis (mGMYC) recovered support for as many as 23 species and in two cases delimited multiple species within a single cytb haplotype; however, this method tends to over-split species [58, 76]. We suggest that there is strong evidence for 21 species in this assemblage when combining congruence across species delimitation analyses and ecological host specificity data (discussed in detail below). Additional studies that examine the potential for these putative species to sexually reproduce are warranted [77], though the observation that they occur sympatrically across the study region and yet appear to have ceased gene flow and in most cases have evolved divergent ecologies suggests that we have delimited reproductively isolated units.

Putative Leucocytozoon species exhibit a range of genetic and ecological divergence despite shallow mitochondrial differentiation

While the morphospecies concept that was traditionally used to delimit Leucocytozoon species clearly underestimates Leucocytozoon species diversity, our results indicate that the mtDNA barcoding approach is likely to overestimate species diversity. In particular, a “one base pair rule” whereby a single base pair difference in the cytb barcoding fragment indicates reproductive isolation has become a popular means with which to delimit species in macroecological studies of haemosporidian diversity [35, 36, 78] despite mixed support for the rule [22, 79, 80]. We recovered support for 21 species of Leucocytozoon despite studying 28 cytb haplotypes, several of which differed by a single base pair.

Across 14 pairs of cytb haplotypes that differed by one to three base pairs (0.2–0.6%), we observed no consistent relationship between cytb and nuclear divergence or the results of species delimitation analyses. Cytb haplotype pairs that differed by a single base tended to be recovered as conspecific and share nuclear alleles (six of seven instances), with one notable exception between the cytb haplotypes CATUST14 and PERCAN01. Among cytb haplotype pairs that differed by two or three bases, there was no pattern between nuclear divergence and species delimitation: four haplotype pairs were found to be conspecific with little to no nuclear divergence, while three were found to be heterospecific and were divergent across nuclear loci. Interestingly, there was a strong effect of phylogeny – similar scales of cytb divergence reflected very different nuclear divergences in two well-sampled clades. One possible explanation for this pattern is variation in effective population size caused by population bottlenecks or differences in life histories [81], as larger populations are able to retain more genetic variation (e.g. cytb polymorphisms may be retained in species with large effective population sizes and lost in those with small population sizes). Overall, these results indicate that there is no consistent “barcode gap” [82] among Leucocytozoon cytb haplotypes, as shallow mitochondrial divergence can reflect divergent histories of reproductive isolation in different lineages.

Species delimitations were supported by an analysis of how these putative species infect the host community based on sequencing of 406 Leucocytozoon infections from 381 sampled hosts. Generally, the putative species identified by genetic species delimitation infected significantly different proportions of the host community than their closest relatives based on analysis of the weighted UniFrac metric. However, similar to the genetic results we observed a range of differentiation in host specificity among putative species with closely related species pairs exhibiting divergent (e.g. ACAFLA03/CATUST14) or nearly identical (e.g. CATUST28/CATMIN05) host infection patterns. It is clear from this analysis that the evolution of host specificity in this system is dynamic and can be informative for species delimitation, especially when comparing putative species that are weakly diverged across barcode loci. As host specificity metrics can only be used to characterize parasite populations, and not individual parasites, simultaneous analysis of host specificity and genetic data within a single analytical framework is not possible. In systems that are amenable to experimentation, it may be possible to measure the ability of individual parasites to infect different host groups, though such an analysis is likely not realistic for most host-parasite systems. Future research on this system will also benefit greatly from studies of how these putative species differ in their patterns of vector (i.e. invertebrate host) use. It is possible that these putative species differ in the species of blackfly vector that they are transmitted by, potentially providing additional evidence for reproductive isolation [8385]. However, research on Leucocytozoon infection patterns in blackflies in Colorado [86] found that a single blackfly species can vector a broad evolutionary diversity of Leucocytozoon haplotypes. For instance, the blackfly Simulium silvestre was found to harbor 32 divergent Leucocytozoon cytb haplotypes (including seven haplotypes found in this study), demonstrating that vectors may not play an important role as ecological filters within this host-parasite community [87].

It remains likely that the putative species identified here do not represent all Leucocytozoon species present in the studied region. Across all of the screened host samples we identified five additional cytb haplotypes that were found to infect hosts at low frequencies that we were unable to generate nuclear sequence data for (ACAFLA02, CATMIN02, TUMIG12, COLBF21, COLBF28). Furthermore, this study only examined songbird (order Passeriformes) hosts – Leucocytozoon is known to be abundant and diverse in Alaska in several other avian orders (e.g. Galliformes [88] and Anseriformes [89]). Further sampling will likely reveal an even more diverse and complex Leucocytozoon community than we report in the present study, potentially providing additional support for the hypothesis that global species-level diversity of Leucocytozoon, if not all avian haemosporidians, is vastly underestimated.

The finding that no universal mtDNA barcode gap exists for Leucocytozoon raises the question of whether there is a need for a paradigm shift in our approach to delimiting species of avian haemosporidians [21] and other groups for which classical barcoding approaches fail. Ideally, future studies that rely on species-level delimitations of avian haemosporidians will use an integrative taxonomic approach combining multi-locus sequence and ecological data (e.g. vertebrate and vector host use data). Perhaps more realistically, at least one additional line of evidence in conjunction with cytb barcode sequence should be sought in order to accurately delimit haemosporidian species (Additional file 1: Table S9). For instance, [90] used host-parasite interaction data to delimit evolutionary lineages of avian haemosporidians from cytb barcode data (though they used a different segment of cytb than what was sequenced in the present study). When sequencing additional markers is not possible, future research should assess the sensitivity of analyses to using alternative species delimitations for cytb haplotypes, and consider removing rare haplotypes that do not have sufficient sample sizes to test for divergence in the ecological trait of interest (e.g. host specificity or associations with abiotic environmental variables). Public databases such as MalAvi [23] that record both genetic and ecological data will be integral in this regard, and we encourage authors to deposit complete records (i.e. each individual host-parasite association) of parasite prevalence across host communities for maximum utility of the data.

Conclusions

We show that both morphology and mtDNA barcodes are incapable of accurately delimiting species in the avian malaria genus Leucocytozoon, and that integrating multi-species coalescent models that assess evolutionary independence with host specificity data recovers support for at least 21 species occurring sympatrically in central Alaska. We find that evidence for reproductive isolation among putative Leucocytozoon species can occur with minimal mitochondrial divergence – in one case just a single base pair difference – but across all putative species we observed a continuum of genetic and ecological divergence that was not closely associated with differences in the popular cytb barcoding locus. These findings suggest that the process of divergence in avian malaria parasites is complex and variable with respect to genetic and ecological differentiation. Avian haemosporidian mitochondrial diversity continues to be uncovered at a rapid rate, though if we are to understand the ecological and evolutionary patterns and processes that influence haemosporidian diversity it will be critical that we are accurately delimiting evolutionarily independent lineages. Assessing species limits using the multi-species coalescent model and host specificity provided a more nuanced view of species divergence in this system than would have been possible with either data type alone, suggesting that a shift in species delimitation approaches for malaria parasites and other diverse microbial symbionts is warranted.

Abbreviations

Bp: 

Base pairs

BPP: 

Bayesian Phylogenetics and Phylogeography

Cytb

Cytochrome b

GMYC: 

General Mixed Yule Coalescent

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank George Barrowclough, Jonas Lai, and Joel Cracraft from the American Museum of Natural History and Jack Withrow and Kevin Winker from the University of Alaska Museum of the North for logistical help and assistance with sampling for this study. Lukas Musher provided valuable feedback on the manuscript. We thank Brynn Parr of the Alaska Department of Fish and Game for assistance with acquiring collecting permits.

Funding

This work was supported by the REU biology program at the American Museum of Natural History (NSF Award 1358465), the Theodore Roosevelt Memorial Fund from the American Museum of Natural History, the Society of Systematic Biologists graduate student research award, and the Explorer’s Club student grant. The funding sources had no role in design, implementation, or writing of the study.

Availability of data and materials

Genetic data is available through GenBank (accession numbers: MG946320-MG946383, MG946384-MG946450, MG946451-MG946505, MG946506-MG946572, MG946573-MG946614, MG946615-MG946674, MG946675-MG946714). Alignments, tree topologies, host specificity data, and R code for analyses is available at: https://github.com/sgalen/Leucocytozoon_Species_Delimitation_2018

Authors’ contributions

SCG and SLP designed the study. SCG and PRS collected samples. SCG and RN performed lab work. SCG wrote the manuscript, which was read and edited by all authors. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval

Birds were collected under State of Alaska Department of Fish and Game Scientific Permits 16–013 and 17–092 and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the American Museum of Natural History.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA
(2)
Richard Gilder Graduate School, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA
(3)
Department of Ornithology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA

References

  1. Fujita MK, Leaché AD, Burbrink FT, McGuire JA, Moritz C. Coalescent-based species delimitation in an integrative taxonomy. Trends Ecol Evol. 2012;27:480–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Carstens BC, Dewey TA. Species delimitation using a combined coalescent and information-theoretic approach: an example from north American Myotis bats. Syst Biol. 2010;59:400–14.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Leaché AD, Fujita MK. Bayesian species delimitation in west African forest geckos (Hemidactylus fasciatus). Proc Royal Soc B. 2010; https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb20100662.
  4. Smith BT, Ribas CC, Whitney BM, Hernandez-Banos BE, Klicka J. Identifying biases at different spational and temporal scales of diversification: a case study in the Neotropical parrotlet genus Forpus. Mol Ecol. 2013;22:483–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Musher LJ, Cracraft J. Phylogenomics and species delimitation of a complex radiation of Neotropical suboscine birds (Pachyramphus). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2018;118:204–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Pons J, Barraclough TG, Gomez-Zurita J, Cardoso A, Duran DP, Hazell S, et al. Sequence-based species delimitation for the DNA taxonomy of undescribed insects. Syst Biol. 2006;55:595–609.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Huang J-P, Knowles LL. The species versus subspecies conundrum: quantitative delimitation from integrating multiple data types within a single Bayesian approach in Hercules beetles. Syst Biol. 2016;65:685–99.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Boenigk J, Ereshefsky M, Hoef-Emden K, Mallet J, Bass D. Concepts in protistology: species definitions and boundaries. Eur J Protistol. 2012;48:96–102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Zhao Y, Yi Z, Gentekaki E, Zhan A, Al-Farraj SA, Song W. Utility of combining morphological characters, nuclear and mitochondrial genes: an attempt to resolve the conflicts of species identification for ciliated protists. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2016;94:718–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Warner RE. The role of introduced diseases in the extinction of the endemic Hawaiian avifauna. Condor. 1968;70:101–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Lanciotti RS, Roehrig JT, Deubel V, Smith J, Parker M, Steele K, et al. Origin of the West Nile virus responsible for an outbreak of encephalitis in the northeastern United States. Science. 1999;286:2333–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gargas A, Trest MT, Christensen M, Volk TJ, Blehert DS. Geomyces destructans sp. nov associated with bat white-nose syndrome. Mycotaxon. 2009;108:147–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Bensch S, Pérez-Tris J, Waldenström J, Hellgren O, Poulin R. Linkage between nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences in avian malaria parasites: multiple cases of cryptic speciation? Evolution. 2004;58:1617–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Sehgal RNM, Hull AC, Anderson NL, Valkiūnas G, Markovets MJ, Kawamura S, et al. Evidence for cryptic speciation of Leucocytozoon spp. (Haemosporida, Leucocytozoidae) in diurnal raptors. J Parasitol. 2006;92:375–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Falk BG, Luke Mahler D, Perkins SL. Tree-based delimitation of morphologically ambiguous taxa: a study of the lizard malaria parasites on the Caribbean island of Hispaniola. Int J Parasitol. 2011;41:967–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Falk BG, Glor RE, Perkins SL. Clonal reproduction shapes evolution in the lizard malaria parasite Plasmodium floridense. Evolution. 2015;69:1584–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Rissler LJ, Apodaca JJ, Weins J. Adding more ecology into species delimitation: ecological niche models and Phylogeography help define cryptic species in the black salamander (Aneides flavipunctatus). Syst Biol. 2007;56:924–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Raxworthy CJ, Ingram CM, Rabibisoa N, Pearson RG, Weins J. Applications of ecological niche modeling for species delimitation: a review and empirical evaluation using day geckos (Phelsuma) from Madagascar. Syst Biol. 2007;56:907–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Martinsen ES, Perkins SL, Schall JJ. A three-genome phylogeny of malaria parasites (Plasmodium and closely related genera): evolution of life-history traits and host switches. Mol Phy Evol. 2008;47:261–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Galen SC, Borner J, Martinsen ES, Schaer J, Austin CC, West CJ, Perkins SL. The polyphyly of Plasmodium: comprehensive phylogenetic analyses of the malaria parasites (order Haemosporida) reveal widespread taxonomic conflict. Roy Soc Open Sci. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171780.
  21. Outlaw DC, Ricklefs RE. Species limits in avian malaria parasites (Haemosporida): how to move forward in the molecular era. Parasitology. 2014;141:1223–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Nilsson E, Taubert H, Hellgren O, Huang X, Palinauskas V, Markovets MY, et al. Multiple cryptic species of sympatric generalists within the avian blood parasite Haemoproteus majoris. J Evol Biol. 2016;29:1812–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Bensch S, Hellgren O, Pérez-Tris J. MalAvi: a public database of malaria parasites and related haemosporidians in avian hosts based on mitochondrial cytochrome b lineages. Mol Ecol Resour. 2009;9:1353–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Asghar M, Hasselquist D, Hansson B, Zehtindjiev P, Westerdahl H, Bensch S. Hidden costs of infection: chronic malaria accelerates telomere degradation and senescence in wild birds. Science. 2015;347:436–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Nylin S, Agosta S, Bensch S, Boeger WA, Braga MP, Brooks DR, et al. Embracing colonizations: a new paradigm for species association dynamics. Trends Ecol Evol. 2018;33:4–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ricklefs RE, Swanson BL, Fallon SM, Martinez-Abrain A, Scheuerlein A, Gray J, Latta SC. Community relationships of avian malaria parasites in southern Missouri. Ecol Monogr. 2005;75:543–59.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Clark NJ, Clegg SM, Sam K, Goulding W, Koane B, Wells K. Climate, host phylogeny, and the connectivity of host communities govern regional parasite assembly. Divers Distributions. 2018;24:13–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Galen SC, Witt CC. Diverse avian malaria and other haemosporidian parasites in Andean house wrens: evidence for regional co-diversification by host-switching. J Avian Biol. 2014;45:374–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Ricklefs RE, Outlaw DC, Svensson-Coehlo M, Medeiros MCI, Ellis VA, Latta S. 2014. Species formation by host shifting in avian malaria parasites. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;41:14816–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Garnham PCC. Malaria parasites and other Haemosporidia: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1966.Google Scholar
  31. Valkiunas G. Avian malaria parasites and other Haemosporidia: CRC Press; 2004.Google Scholar
  32. Martinsen ES, Paperna I, Schall JJ. Morphological versus molecular identification of avian Haemosporidia: an exploration of three species concepts. Parasitology. 2006;133:279–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Charleston MA, Perkins S. Lizards, malaria, and jungles in the Carribean. In: Page RDM, editor. Tangled trees: phylogeny, Cospeciation and coevolution. Chicago: University of Chicago; 2003.Google Scholar
  34. Ricklefs RE, Outlaw DC. A molecular clock for malaria parasites. Science. 2010;329:226–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Jenkins T, Owens IPF. Biogeography of avian blood parasites (Leucocytozoon spp.) in two resident hosts across Europe: phylogeographic structuring or the abundance-occupancy relationship? Mol Ecol. 2011;20:3910–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Drovetski SV, Aghayan SA, Mata VA, Lopes RJ, Mode NA, Harvey JA, et al. Does the niche breadth or trade-off hypothesis explain the abundance–occupancy relationship in avian Haemosporidia? Mol Ecol. 2014;23:3322–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Clark NJ, Clegg SM. Integrating phylogenetic and ecological distances reveals new insights into parasite host specificity. Mol Ecol. 2017;26:3074–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Rannala B. The art and science of species delimitation. Curr Zool. 2015;61:846–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Bennett GF, Peirce MA, Earlé RA. An annotated checklist of the valid avian species of Haemoproteus, Leucocytozoon (Apicomplexa: Haemosporida) and Hepatozoon (Apicomplexa: Haemogregarinidae). Syst Parasitol. 1994;29:61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Oakgrove KS, Harrigan RJ, Loiseau C, Guers S, Seppi B, Sehgal RNM. Distribution, diversity and drivers of blood-borne parasite co-infections in Alaskan bird populations. Int J Parasitol. 2014;44:717–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Freund D, Wheeler SS, Townsend AK, Boyce WM, Ernest HB, Cicero C, et al. Genetic sequence data reveals widespread sharing of Leucocytozoon lineages in corvids. Parasitol Res. 2016;115:3557–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Marroquin-Flores RA, Williamson JL, Chavez AN, Bauernfeind SM, Baumann MJ, Gadek CR, et al. Diversity, abundance, and host relationships of avian malaria and related haemosporidians in New Mexico pine forests. Peer J. 2017;5:e3700.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Fair J, Paul E, Jones J. Guidelines to the use of wild birds in research. Washington, D.C: Ornithological council; 2010.Google Scholar
  44. Hellgren O, Waldenström J, Bensch S. A new PCR assay for simultaneous studies of Leucocytozoon, Plasmodium, and Haemoproteus from avian blood. J Parasitol. 2004;90:797–802.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Valkiūnas G, Bensch S, Iezhova TA, Križanauskienė A, Hellgren O, Bolshakov CV. Nested cytochrome B polymerase chain reaction diagnostics underestimate mixed infections of avian blood Haemosporidian parasites: microscopy is still essential. J Parasitol. 2006;92:418–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Borner J, Pick C, Thiede J, Kolawole OM, Kingsley MT, Schulze J, et al. Phylogeny of haemosporidian blood parasites revealed by a multi-gene approach. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2016;94:221–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Manske M, Miotto O, Campino S, Auburn S, Almagro-Garcia J, Maslen G, et al. Analysis of Plasmodium falciparum diversity in natural infections by deep sequencing. Nature. 2012;487:375–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Hicks ND, Schall JJ. Dynamics of clonal diversity in natural infections of the malaria parasite Plasmodium mexicanum in its free-ranging lizard host. Parasitology Res. 2014;113:2059–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Drummond AJ, Suchard MA, Xie D, Rambaut A. Bayesian Phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29:1969–73.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods. 2012;9:772.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA. Tracer v1.7, Available from http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/. 2018.
  52. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 2000;17:540–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol. 2000;9:1657–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Leigh JW, Bryant D. Popart: full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol Evol. 2015;6:1110–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Carstens BC, Pelletier TA, Reid NM, Satler JD. How to fail at species delimitation. Mol Ecol. 2013;22:4369–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Monaghan MT, Wild R, Elliot M, Fujisawa T, Balke M, Inward DJG, et al. Accelerated species inventory on Madagascar using coalescent-based models of species delineation. Syst Biol. 2009;58:298–311.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Fujisawa T, Barraclough TG. Delimiting species using single-locus data and the generalized mixed yule coalescent approach: a revised method and evaluation on simulated data sets. Syst Biol. 2013;62:707–24.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Talavera G, Dincă V, Vila R. Factors affecting species delimitations with the GMYC model: insights from a butterfly survey. Methods Ecol Evol. 2013;4:1101–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Reid NM, Carstens BC. Phylogenetic estimation error can decrease the accuracy of species delimitation: a Bayesian implementation of the general mixed yule-coalescent model. BMC Evol Biol. 2012;12:196.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Yang Z. The BPP program for species tree estimation and species delimitation. Curr Zool. 2015;61:854–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Yang Z, Rannala B. Bayesian species delimitation using multilocus sequence data. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:9264–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Rannala B, Yang Z. Improved reversible jump algorithms for Bayesian species delimitation. Genetics. 2013;194:245–53.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Yang Z, Rannala B. Unguided species delimitation using DNA sequence data from multiple loci. Mol Biol Evol. 2014;31:3125–35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Yang Z, Rannala B. Bayesian species identification under the multispecies coalescent provides significant improvements to DNA barcoding analyses. Mol Ecol. 2017;26:3028–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Burbrink FT, Yao H, Ingrasci M, Bryson RW, Guiher TJ, Ruane S. Speciation at the Mogollon rim in the Arizona Mountain Kingsnake (Lampropeltis pyromelana). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2011;60:445–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Solis-Lemus C, Knowles LL, Ane C. Bayesian species delimitation combining multiple genes and traits in a unified framework. Evolution. 2015;69:492–507.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Poulin R, Mouillot D. Parasite specialization from a phylogenetic perspective: a new index of host specificity. Parasitology. 2003;126:473–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Poulin R, Mouillot D. Host specificity and the probability of discovering species of helminth parasites. Parasitology. 2005;130:709–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Lozupone C, Knight R. UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:8228–35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  71. McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. phyloseq: An R Package for Reproducible Interactive Analysis and Graphics of Microbiome Census Data. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e61217.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  72. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K. APE: analyses of Phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:289–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Oksanen J, Guillaume FB, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.4–5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan. 2017.
  74. Lotta IA, Gonzalez AD, Pacheco MA, Escalante AA, Valkiūnas G, Moncada LI, et al. Leucocytozoon pterotenuis sp. nov. (Haemosporida, Leucocytozoidae): description of the morphologically unique species from the Grallariidae birds, with remarks on the distribution of Leucocytozoon parasites in the Neotropics. Parasitol Res. 2015;114:1031–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Lotta IA, Pacheco MA, Escalante AA, González AD, Mantilla JS, Moncada LI, et al. Leucocytozoon diversity and possible vectors in the Neotropical highlands of Colombia. Protist. 2016;167:185–204.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Blair C, Bryson RW. Cryptic diversity and discordance in single-locus species delimitation methods within horned lizards (Phrynosomatidae: Phrynosoma). Mol Ecol Resour. 2017;17:1168–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Valkiūnas G, Iezhova TA, Križanauskienė A, Palinauskas V, Bensch S. In vitro hybridization of Haemoproteus spp.: an experimental approach for direct investigation of reproductive isolation of parasites. J Parasitol. 2008;94:1385–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Cornuault J, Bataillard A, Warren BH, Lootvoet A, Mirleau P, Duval T, et al. The role of immigration and in-situ radiation in explaining blood parasite assemblages in an island bird clade. Mol Ecol. 2012;21:1438–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Hellgren O, Atkinson CT, Bensch S, Albayrak T, Dimitrov D, Ewen JG, et al. Global phylogeography of the avian malaria pathogen Plasmodium relictum based on MSP1 allelic diversity. Ecography. 2015;38:842–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Palinauskas V, Bernotiene R, Ziegyte R, Bensch S, Valkiunas G. Experimental evidence for hybridization of closely related lineages in Plasmodium relictum. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2017;217:1–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Charlesworth B. Effective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation. Nature Rev Genet. 2009;10:195–205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Puillandre N, Lambert A, Brouillet S, Achaz G. ABGD, automatic barcode gap discovery for primary species delimitation. Mol Ecol. 2012;21:1864–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Hellgren O, Bensch S, Malmqvist B. Bird hosts, blood parasites and their vectors — associations uncovered by molecular analyses of blackfly blood meals. Mol Ecol. 2008;17:1605–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Gager AB, Del Rosario LJ, Dearborn DC, Bermingham E. Do mosquitoes filter the access of Plasmodium cytochrome b lineages to an avian host? Mol Ecol. 2008;17:2552–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Woodford L, Bianco G, Ivanova Y, Dale M, Elmer K, Rae F, Larcombe SD, Helm B, Ferguson HM, Baldini F. Vector species-specific association between natural Wolbachia infections and avian malaria in black fly populations. Sci Reports. 2018;8:4188.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Murdock CC, Adler PH, Frank J, Perkins SL. Molecular analyses on host-seeking black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae) reveal a diverse assemblage of Leucocytozoon (Apicomplexa: Haemosporida) parasites in an alpine system. Parasite Vector. 2015;8:343.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Medeiros MCI, Hamer GL, Ricklefs RE. Host compatibility rather than vector–host-encounter rate determines the host range of avian Plasmodium parasites. Proc R Soc B. 2013;280:20122947.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Smith MM, Van Hemert C, Merizon R. Haemosporidian parasite infections in grouse and ptarmigan: prevalence and genetic diversity of blood parasites in resident Alaskan birds. Int J Parasitol. 2016;5:229–39.Google Scholar
  89. Reeves AB, Smith MM, Meixell BW, Fleskes JP, Ramey AM. Genetic diversity and host specificity varies across three genera of blood parasites in ducks of the Pacific Americas flyway. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0116661.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  90. Svensson-Coelho M, Blake JG, Loiselle BA, Penrose AS, Parker PG, Ricklefs RE. Diversity, Prevalence, and Host specificity of Avian Plasmodium and Haemoproteus in a Western Amazon Assemblage. Ornithological Monographs No. 76. https://doi.org/10.1525/om.2013.76.1.1.

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement