Skip to main content
Download PDF

Intra-population variability of the saccular, utricular and lagenar otoliths of the garfish Belone belone (Linnaeus, 1760) from South-Western Ionian Sea (Central Mediterranean Sea)

BMC Ecology and Evolution volume 24, Article number: 31 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

The garfish Belone belone represents the only valid endemic Belone species for the Mediterranean Sea and the eastern Atlantic Ocean. It shows a wide global distribution range, with a high commercial value and ecological relevance in the pelagic domain. Despite this, there needs to be more knowledge regarding the otoliths of this species, with the total absence of descriptions regarding asterisci and lapilli from Mediterranean populations and a lack of studies on the reliability of shape analysis on its sagittae. The present paper aims to provide the first main contours description of the three otoliths pairs from a Mediterranean population, providing an accurate investigation of morphology, morphometry, and intra-specific variability of sagittae, lapilli, and asterisci. Results showed (i) the absence of directional bilateral asymmetry and sexual asymmetry for the three otoliths pairs, (ii) a different morphology and morphometry of sagittae, lapilli and asterisci than those described in the literature, and (iii) an enhanced variability between sagittae morphometry and shape between the three investigated size classes. All these data confirmed the reliability of the studied species of shape analysis, showing a geographical and size-related variability of otoliths features probably related to genetics, environmental conditions, and life habits variations.

Peer Review reports

Background

The family Belonidae, order Beloniformes, includes ten genera and 34 species of freshwater and marine teleost known as needlefishes [1, 2]. They are characterized by an elongated body and long upper and lower jaws, resulting in a beak with a large mouth opening equipped with sharp needle-like teeth. Small cycloid scales are distributed along their lateral lines. A separation in the third pair of the upper pharyngeal bones is typical of this family, together with the absence of spines in the fins, no finlets behind the anal and the dorsal fins, and the nostrils placed in a pit anteriorly to the eyes [3, 4]. All needlefishes’ species are oviparous and live close to the surface. They are ichthyophage predators, hunting on small fishes using their beaks. In the Mediterranean Sea, they have been recognized six species of needlefishes belonging to four genera: Ablennes hians, Valenciennes, 1846, Belone belone, Linnaeus, 1761, Belone svetovidovi, Collette & Parin, 1970, Tylosurus acus acus, Lacépède, 1803, Tylosurus acus imperialis, Rafinesque, 1810, and the non-indigenous indo-pacific species Tylosurus choram, Rüppell, 1837 [4,5,6].

Concerning B. belone, in 1970 [7], they were acknowledged three subspecies according to their global distribution (B. b. belone, Linnaeus, 1761, B. b. euxini, Günther, 1866, B. b. gracilis, Lowe, 1839), but recently the garfish B. belone was accepted as the only valid endemic species for the Mediterranean Sea and the eastern Atlantic Ocean [8]. This species shows a wide distribution range, inhabiting brackish and marine environments from Norway to the Canaries, in addition to the Mediterranean and Black Seas. Like other pelagic teleosts, it is an oceanodromous species. It inhabits the offshore areas, moving near the coast during spawning season. It is during this migratory pattern that garfish populations are more susceptible to fisheries activities [9, 10], being mainly caught using floating gill nets and pelagic trawling. In the Adriatic Sea and Turkish Mediterranean waters, garfish is the principal target species of seine nets, representing also a by-catch species in purse seine fisheries [3, 11,12,13]. In the Mediterranean Sea, the B. belone capture production has been growing since 2016, stationing at 621 tons in 2018, with Turkey, Tunisia, Greece, and Spain as the leading countries for its harvesting and consumption [14]. This species is among the most important pelagic commercial species of Turkey, especially for the Black Sea’s Turkish artisanal fisheries and Tunisia, representing the main belonids species for catch in the entire Mediterranean basin [15,16,17]. In addition to its commercial value, garfish plays a fundamental ecological role in the pelagic domain. It is an opportunistic predator that switches its prey preferences from crustaceans (e.g., copepods, decapods larvae, amphipods) to teleost fishes (e.g., clupeids, engraulids, horse mackerels), according to its size and the preys’ availability [18,19,20,21]. Additionally, it is among the principal preys of larger pelagic fishes and marine mammals [22,23,24]. Due to its high commercial and ecological value, many studies have been performed on the biology of this species. These provided essential information for accurate stock assessments, exploring its population dynamics (e.g., age structure, growth, mortality, reproductive cycle), metazoan parasites communities, and trophic ecology in the different Mediterranean geographical areas [12, 15, 17, 21, 25,26,27,28,29,30]. However, relatively few researches have been performed on garfish otoliths, another fundamental tool for stock assessment and population studies [31,32,33,34,35,36].

Otoliths are paired carbonate structures in the vertebrates’ inner ears, close to the midbrain, with auditory and vestibular functions [37]. Teleost’s inner ear (one for each side) is characterized by a great morphological variability among different taxa [38]. Its basic structure, common in bony and cartilaginous fishes, is characterized by three semicircular canals, with their end organs (ampullae) and three otoliths end organs (saccule, utricle, lagena). Otoliths are located inside these lasts (one otolith in each organ: respectively, sagitta, lapillus, and asteriscus), which, according to their taxon-specific orientation related to the fish’s rostrocaudal axis, are essential for the localization of sound sources [39]. They are composed of calcium carbonate and non-collagenous organic matrix, depositing daily for the entire fishes’ lifetime [40, 41], and, among the three otoliths pairs, sagittae have long been the most studied. Due to their species-specific morphology, timekeeping and chemical properties, and variability at intra and interspecific levels, sagittae long been widely used in many research fields, including taxonomy and paleoethology, to trophic ecology and fisheries science [33, 42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53]. Data on lapilli and asterisci are very few and fragmentary, especially concerning the marine teleost species; this is attributable to their dimension, smaller than sagittae in non-ostariophysian fishes [54,55,56], and, especially for asterisci, mainly composed of vaterite, to their low resistance to the extraction process. It has also been claimed that lapilli and asterisci show a low intra and inter-specific variability, considerably less evident than sagittae [57, 58]. Conversely, recent findings by several authors have assessed, also in otophysans species, a substantial inter-specific diversity valuable for species identification and evident intra-specific variations between different populations related to environmental factors, as also confirmed in not-otophysans species [57,58,59,60,61]. Indeed, according to T. Schulz-Mirbach et al. [59], providing new information on lapilli and asterisci of the different teleost’s species, also applying shape analysis, is required to evaluate the additional data provided by the investigations on all the otoliths pairs, improving species identification processes, stock assessment, and fisheries management.

Concerning B. belone otoliths, literature data are scarce, with few studies on sagittae, describing their gross morphology, the relations between fish length and otolith size, and some morphometrical features [62,63,64,65,66]. Only three studies describe lapilli and asterisci in populations inhabiting the Mediterranean Sea and Portuguese Atlantic waters [57, 58, 67]. In this context, the present paper aims to analyze the three otoliths pairs of garfish from the Ionian Sea (the Italian Sea with the highest values of capture production for this species in 2020 [68]) through morphological, morphometrical, and shape analysis, in order to investigate the intra specific variability of sagittae, lapilli and asterisci between different size classes, otoliths pairs and populations, comparing data from present paper to those from literature. The present paper can allow (i) to investigate the presence of otoliths’ bilateral asymmetry and sexual variability inside the analyzed population, (ii) to compare otoliths’ morphology and morphometry between the Ionian Sea and other geographical areas through a comparison with literature data and (iii) to give an accurate otoliths’ contours description, essential for stock assessment.

All this information is fundamental to improving the knowledge base on the eco-morphological adaptation of this species to the pelagic environment, filling the gap in the morphology, shape, and intra-specific variability of sagittae, lapilli, and asterisci. Indeed, there needs to be more data on sagittae from the Ionian Sea and an almost total absence of studies on lapilli and asterisci, especially from the Mediterranean Sea, regarding the studied species [57, 58, 67]. Moreover, taking into account the difficulties in assessing the stock composition and discriminating among populations of medium-large size pelagic fishes due to their broad geographical range and the absence of biogeographical barriers [69, 70], the present paper can improve the capability to distinguish separated fish groups of B. belone, providing the first accurate shape analysis on the three otoliths pairs. This is fundamental to correctly distinguishing populations and stocks for better conservation and improved fisheries management.

Materials and methods

Sample collection, processing, and image analysis

Sixty-five specimens of B. belone were obtained already dead from a market in Catania (Italy, Sicily) supplied by local artisanal fisheries operating in the Ionian Sea (FAO statistical division 37.2.2-Ionian Sea; Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map of the Mediterranean Sea with sampling area of B. belone specimens analyzed in this study highlighted by the red circle

Full size image

Samples were transported still frozen in the laboratory, where each specimen was weighted (Total Weight: TW, g), measured (Total Length: TL, mm) and sexed. Individuals were assigned to three size classes according to its TL (Class I: TL ≤ 240 mm; Class II: 240 mm < TL ≤ 290 mm; Class III: TL > 290 mm), using K-means clustering method. Each otolith (sagitta, lapillus, and asteriscus of each inner ear) was extracted and gently washed in 3% H2O2 and Milli-Q water to remove tissue remains. Once dried, each sagitta, lapillus, and asteriscus face was photographed twice using the Axiocam 208 color camera (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) under a stereomicroscope Zeiss Discovery V8. Otolith images were processed and converted into binary format for shape analysis using ImageJ 1.48p software [71]. Once obtained from shape analysis, data on maximum otolith length, OL mm, maximum otolith width, OW mm, otolith perimeter, OP mm and otolith surface, OS, mm2 for each analyzed otolith, investigated the relation between otolith and fish length calculating the ratio of otolith length to the total fish length (OL/TL). Moreover, in order to evaluate how otoliths’ morphometric relationships and morphology features change intra-specifically, they were calculated several shape indices, according to literature [72,73,74,75,76,77]: circularity (C = OP2/OS), rectangularity (Re = OS/[OL × OW]), ellipticity (E = OL–OW/OL + OW), aspect ratio (AR = OW/OL%), form factor (FF = 4πOS/OP2) and roundness (Ro = 4OS/πOL2).

Shape analysis

The otoliths outlines were used to perform the Shape analysis using the open-access package shape R on R software (RStudio 2022.07.1 Build 554; R Gui 4.1.3 2022.03.10). This package was designed for the otolith shape studies, widely used to analyze the intra and inter-specific variations in teleost species and populations [78]. ImageJ software (version 1.53 k freely available at https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/) was used to binarize each sagitta, lapilli and asterisci picture, which, subsequently, was classified according to fish size classes, sex, and otoliths’ side. The greyscale threshold was set at 0.05 (intensity threshold) to detect the outlines using a specific shape R function. The data file with analyzed specimens’ information (e.g., body weight and fish length) was linked to the extracted contours. The getMeasurements function was applied to calculate the otoliths’ length, width, area, and perimeter for each specimen on the previously detected outlines. The allometric relationships were assessed between fish lengths and otolith shapes, extracting Wavelet and Fourier coefficients, adequately adjusted, through proper functions of Shape R. The intra-specific comparison between the mean otolith shapes was obtained using the Wavelet coefficients, estimating the quality of the reconstruction through the analysis of the deviation of the coefficients’ reconstruction from the otolith outline (Fig. S1). A specific function of the g-plots R package was applied to investigate the influence of the position along the outline on the wavelet coefficients’ variation (Fig. S2).

Data analysis

Univariate and multivariate statistical methods were applied to conduct investigations on asterisci, lapilli, and sagittae using Prism V.8.2.1 (Graph-pad Software Ltd., La Jolla, CA 92037, USA), R vegan package V.2.5, and PAST V.4.

An unpaired t-test was used as a tool to investigate the occurrence of differences in morphometric parameters between sexes and between right and left otoliths. Any otolith morphometric variations between the different size classes investigated were detected using a one-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA). Additionally, the correlation between the measured parameters and fish body weight (BW) and total length (TL) was tested using the Pearson correlation coefficient.

To explore the variation of otolith contours between specimens, the shape indices were extrapolated and analyzed through an ANOVA-like permutation test and a Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) to obtain an overview of the differences in otolith shape between right and left side, gender, and size classes examined. The significance level of the p-value was set at < 0.05.

Results

A total of 65 individuals (20 males and 45 females) were examined, with 18 specimens classified as Class I, 35 as Class II, and 12 as Class III.

Morphometric and Shape analysis of Sagittae

According to the terminology proposed by Tuset et al., Nolf and Assis [66, 67, 79], B. belone showed overall elliptic-lanceolate sagittae (Fig. 2 a-c), characterized by peaked anterior region, with a short rostrum, pointed and broad, and a round posterior region. The antirostrum was generally absent, except in some specimens, in which it was very short, broad, and pointed. The excisura ostii was absent or wide, changing in the different individuals according to the size class of belonging.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Stereoscope images of left sagittae belonging to size class I (a), II (b) and III (c). Scale bar: 1 cm

Full size image

In Table 1 they were reported the morphometric parameters assessed for the studied specimens.

Table 1 Sagittae morphometric mean values, with standard deviation (s.d.), maximum (Max.), and minimum (Min.) values, for each investigated size class: maximum otolith length (OL, mm) and otolith width (OW, mm), otolith perimeter (OP, mm), otolith surface (OS, mm2), otolith length to the total fish length ratio (OL/TL), circularity (C), rectangularity (Re), ellipticity (E), aspect ratio (AR), form factor (FF) and roundness (Ro)
Full size table

The examination showed no significant variation between the right and left sagittae (p > 0.05).

Gender represented a discriminating factor only for 3 of the morphometric parameters investigated, namely OS (p = 0.014), OL (p = 0.025) and E (p = 0.01).

Finally, the size class strongly influenced the morphometric variability observed between the samples, as confirmed by LDA (Fig. 3). Results, reported in Table 2, highlighted how AR was the only parameter that did not vary between size classes (p > 0.05).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) between sagittae morphometric parameters from the three investigated size classes (aqua dots I, blue dots II and red dots III)

Full size image
Table 2 Results of ANOVA carried out between biometric data (total fish length, TL, and body weight, BW) morphometric sagittal parameters of the investigated specimens belonging to the three size classes, with significant results set at p < 0.05: maximum otolith length (OL, mm) and otolith width (OW, mm), otolith perimeter (OP, mm), otolith surface (OS, mm2), otolith length to the total fish length ratio (OL/TL), circularity (C), rectangularity (Re), ellipticity (E), aspect ratio (AR), form factor (FF) and roundness (Ro)
Full size table

Some morphometric parameters showed a strong positive correlation with the biometric data of the examined specimens (total length, TL, and body weight, BW), except for the OL/TL variable, which, on the contrary, exhibited a negative correlation with the body weight and the total length of the examined species. The Pearson correlation results are shown in Table 3.

Table 3 Pearson correlation results between biometric data (total fish length, TL, and body weight, BW) of the investigated species and morphometric sagittal parameters
Full size table

As reported in Fig. 4a, the shape analysis showed a marked excisura ostii in sagittae belonging to Class I, with regular posterior, slightly lobed margins. Dorsal and ventral margins were crenate, with sculptures that become evident in size classes II and III. Specimens belonging to these last size classes showed a most enhanced rostrum, and a most marked irregularity of the margins, then the first. Concerning the differences between male and female specimens (Fig. 4b), the mean contours evidenced only a slight variation in margin crenation, more marked in males than females, especially in the dorsal margins.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Mean shape of the left sagittae contours belonging to the three size classes (a) and to males (M) and females (F) (b)

Full size image

Given the low significance of the differences observed between the right and left sides, these data were excluded from subsequent analyses. ANOVA and LDA analyzed the wavelet coefficients obtained by the shape analysis to provide an overview of the diversity of sagittal contours between specimens of the opposite sex and between the size classes investigated in the present study. ANOVA showed significant differences between sagittal contours of different size classes (p < 0.05), as confirmed by LDA (Fig. 5). Shape indexes did not show significant variation between sexes (p < 0.05).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) between elliptic Fourier descriptors calculated for the different size classes (aqua dots I, blue dots II and red dots III). Ellipses include a 95% confidence interval

Full size image

Morphometric and Shape analysis of Lapilli

Following the terminology of Assis [57, 67], the studied species showed triangular lapilli with a non-clupeiform-type morphology, longer than wider (Fig. 6a, b). They showed a convex ventral face with a rounded, symmetrical junction between the ventral and dorsal faces. The dorsal face was generally smooth, with a not clearly lobed medial part. The Extremum posterior was lobed and smooth. At the same time, the extremum anterior was sharp and blunt pointed. Prominentia marginalis was little, triangular with a blunt apex, while gibbus maculae was large, with a slightly rough surface and an asymmetric, rounded outline, covering almost entirely the ventral otolith’s face. It did not cover completely prominentia marginalis on the ventral face, while from the dorsal one, it was clearly visible the regio apicale gibbi, almost entirely covering the dorsal outline of the prominentia marginalis. Anteriorly, the sulcus lapillus was clearly visible, sunken along the entire outline of the gibbus maculae.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Stereoscope images of the dorsal (a) and ventral (b) sides of left lapillus. Scale bar: 0,5 cm

Full size image

In Table 4 they were reported the morphometric parameters calculated for the studied specimens for each side.

Table 4 Lapilli morphometric mean values, with standard deviation (s.d.), maximum (Max.), and minimum (Min.) values, for each investigated size class: maximum otolith length (OL, mm) and otolith width (OW, mm), otolith perimeter (OP, mm), otolith surface (OS, mm2), otolith length to the total fish length ratio (OL/TL), circularity (C = OP2/OS), rectangularity (Re = OS/[OL × OW]), ellipticity (E = OL–OW/OL + OW), aspect ratio (AR = OW/OL%), form factor (FF = 4πOS/OP2) and roundness (Ro = 4OS/πOL2)
Full size table

Eleven pairs of Lapilli were analyzed, and no significant variations of the morphometric parameters between the right and left sides were identified. It was not possible to perform comparative analyses between males and females as it was not possible to extract an equal number of lapilli from both sexes. For the same reason, the analysis was inaccurate for size class investigations.

Strong positive correlations were found between TL and BW of the specimens’ vs OL/TL (see Fig. 7).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Pearson correlation matrix assessed between biometric specimens’ data (total fish length, TL, and body weight, BW) of the investigated species and morphometric lapilli parameters

Full size image

Concerning the shape analysis, it showed a rhomboidal to oval mean contour of lapilli (Fig. 8). The medial edge was regular, without the presence of distinct lobes. There was no incision between the extremum posterior and the lateral base of the gibbus maculae. The edge of the extremum anterior was also regular, not lobed. ANOVA reported no significant differences between the shape indices of left and right lapilli.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Mean shape of the left (L) and right (R) lapilli contours

Full size image

Morphometric and Shape analysis of Asterisci

According to the terminology adopted by Assis [58, 67], the studied species showed vertical-type asterisci with a globular dorsal region and a pointed ventral one (Fig. 9a, b). The external face was dorsally flat and ventrally concave, with a slightly rough surface, while the inner face was markedly convex. Lobi were almost completely merged, not always clearly recognizable, with a furrow delimitating lobus minor and lobus major. This last was semi-oval, with a vertical axis much longer than the lobus minor. This was semi-circular, slightly anteriorly angled. Rostrum was short but always identifiable as a short, angled protuberance in the anterior otolith’s margin.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Stereoscope images of the external (a) and internal (b) faces of the right asteriscus. Scale bar: 0,5 cm

Full size image

Conversely, antirostrum was large, globular, and very evident. It was placed in the anterior margin of the antero-dorsal part of the lobus major. Excisura major was wide, and not deep and the fossa acustica was antero-ventrally located, superficial, and very long. Colliculumu was very evident, covering a large part of the fossa acustica.

Table 5 reported the morphometric parameters calculated for the left and right otoliths of the studied specimens.

Table 5 Asterisci morphometric mean values, with standard deviation (s.d.), maximum (Max.), and minimum (Min.) values, for each investigated size class: maximum otolith length (OL, mm) and otolith width (OW, mm), otolith perimeter (OP, mm), otolith surface (OS mm2), otolith length to the total fish length ratio (OL/TL), circularity (C = OP2/OS), rectangularity (Re = OS/[OL × OW]), ellipticity (E = OL–OW/OL + OW), aspect ratio (AR = OW/OL%), form factor (FF = 4πOS/OP2) and roundness (Ro = 4OS/πOL2)
Full size table

Fourteen pairs of asterisci were analyzed, and no significant variations of the morphometric parameters between the right and left sides were identified. It was not possible to perform comparative analyses between males and females as it was not possible to extract an equal number of otoliths from both sexes. For the same reason, the analysis was inaccurate for size class investigations.

Strong positive correlations were found between TL and BW of specimens vs. Asterisci area, length, width, and perimeter (see Fig. 10).

Fig. 10
figure 10

Pearson correlation matrix assessed between biometric specimens’ data (total fish length, TL, and body weight, BW) of the investigated species and morphometric asterisci parameters

Full size image

Concerning the shape analysis, the mean asterisci contours showed an overall oval shape of the otoliths (Fig. 11). The dorsal region contour was globular, while the ventral was tapered and more pointed in the right asterisci than in the left ones. The excisura major was large, with a short and rounded rostrum and a large and globular antirostrum. ANOVA reported no significant differences between the shape indices of left and right asterisci.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Mean shape of the left (L) and right (R) asterisci contours

Full size image

Discussion

The results from present study provided the first complete description of the three otoliths pairs of B. belone through morphometric, morphological and shape analysis, useful to understand their intra specific variability and how this could be influenced by the epipelagic habits of this species. It is important to explore the information stored inside these carbonate structures, able to provide reliable data on the life habits, large- or small-scale migrations, populations structure and habitats switches. Indeed, especially regarding the high migratory epipelagic species, it is often difficult to discriminate between populations, understanding their movements, life habit, and ecomorphological adaptation to epipelagic environment. These kinds of information are essential for conservation porpoises (for a correct fisheries management and resource conservation) and to improve the knowledge base on the ecological dynamics occurring in the pelagic domain. The studied species is an epipelagic species characterized by a migratory pattern, from the off-shore to the near-shore waters, related to spawning. Moreover, it shows a habitat switch during its growth, inhabiting the near-shore coastal environment, often close to freshwater streams, in the first part of the life, moving in the off-shore epipelagic environment during the adult life. The description of the mean otoliths shape and morphometry, and their intra specific variability, provided by results fill the gap present in literature (especially regarding utricular and lagenar otoliths) about the B. belone from the studied area, trying to analyze how its life habit can influence the three otoliths' pairs morphology, morphometry, and shape. Despite there is a lack of relevant information regarding the exact distribution of B. belone in the studied area (being the examined specimens purchased from the market), the local artisanal fisheries suppling the analyzed specimens operates in the Ionian Sea. For this reason, the studied group of individuals are considered belonging to the B. belone population inhabiting this geographical area FAO statistical division 37.2.2-Ionian Sea, as also highlighted by the differences detected in otoliths morphology and morphometry comparing data provided by results with literature from others geographical areas.

Concerning sagittae, morphological data showed an overall morphology in line with literature from the western and central Mediterranean Sea and the Black Sea [64, 66]. Shape indexes presented differences in aspect ratio and rectangularity, with markedly higher values in the studied population than that from the western and central Mediterranean Sea [66]. Differences were evident for both morphometric parameters (OL, OW, OP) and shape indexes (C, AR, Ro), also comparing data with those reported in the literature from the Aegean Sea [63, 80] and the Adriatic Sea [62]. These differences in shape indexes could suggest the reliability, in the studied species, of shape and overall contours for stock assessment and population discrimination, but, unfortunately, no literature data on shape analysis performed on B. belone from other geographical areas are available to confirm this. It is widely reported how morphometric and shape data on sagittae are reliable and useful to understand the population structure of migratory epipelagic species. This is the case of Sardina pilchardus, Walbaum, 1792. The population structure if this species in the Mediterranean Sea and Atlantic Ocean has been reconstructed successfully using otoliths shape descriptors, also elucidating the connectivity between Mediterranean and Oceanic individuals’ groups [81]. This is also the case of Scomberomorus brasiliensis Collette, Russo & Zavala-Camin, 1978, in which the sagittae phenotypic variation has been used as a stock structure’s indicator [69]. Otolith features’ variations between different geographical areas could be related to environmental and genetic differences between the areas and the populations, being otoliths under the dual regulation of environmental conditions and genetics [82, 83]. The main environmental factors influencing otolith morphometry, morphology, and shape are depth, temperature, salinity, diet composition, and food availability. These can alter somatic growth, fish metabolism, and otoliths features [49, 50, 84,85,86] under strong genetic control [81, 82, 87,88,89]. According to the literature, B. belone populations show substantial geographical variability in age at first maturity, growth rates, size ranges, sexes portions, age structures, and length distribution [12, 15, 17, 28]. This high geographical variability in population dynamics could reflect a strong sensitivity of the studied species to environmental conditions and fisheries activities. Indeed, many population descriptors, such as growth rates, abundance, length distribution, and age composition, are strongly affected by water masses, physiochemical and biological features, and fishing pressure [36, 90, 91]. Concerning feeding habits, studied species show a generally stable diet composition within the Mediterranean Sea and the Atlantic Ocean [18, 20, 21], with crustaceans as the main prey category and main differences related to crustaceans’ species contribution and minor preys’ items composition. The variability in diet composition, with the different environmental conditions experienced by the populations, and the inter-population genetic variability, could shape the variations between the different geographical areas in otolith features. Further analyses of the sagittae at inter-population level are required to understand and confirm the strong shape, morphological, and morphometrical differences between specimens of B. belone from different geographical areas. This is essential to assess the reliability of shape analysis for the stock assessment and population discrimination of the species, an essential tool to improve its conservation in the entire Mediterranean basin.

As highlighted by statistical analyses on shape data, the mean sagittal contour of the specimens from the Ionian Sea was not affected by bias related to intra-specific differences between otoliths’ sides and sexes. This, indeed, is one of the main factors that could affect the accuracy of shape analysis for stock assessment, being this strongly altered by choice of sagittae from one side rather than the other, or from one sex rather than the other, in the presence of directional bilateral asymmetry or sexual asymmetry [92,93,94]. Statistical analysis has detected significant differences between the three size classes in morphometry and shape. This strong relation between sagittae morphometry and morphology and specimens’ biometry (total length and body weight); Pearson correlation results also confirmed it. This finding was in line with literature from the Adriatic and Aegean Seas [62, 63], which reported a strong correlation between total fish length and otolith morphometry for B. belone, the strongest among several investigated pelagic species, essential for the back calculation of fish length from the otolith one. The high variability in shape between the sagittae belonging to the three investigated size classes could be related to the life habits of the species. For instance, according to Dorman [18], smaller specimens of B. belone seem to feed more frequently at nearshore surface waters than larger ones, resulting in differences in diet composition. In addition to the contribution of different prey items, the variations in environmental conditions are experienced by smaller and adult specimens, being nearshore water characterized by different physiochemical properties and oceanographic features than the offshore ones. This environmental variability could allow the differences detected between size classes in sagittal shape, but further analysis of the life habits of the studied species in the Ionian Sea are required to confirm this thesis. Moreover, other studies with a widest as possible number of specimens for each size classes and sex are required to confirm the information regarding the intra specific variability in otoliths’ shape and morphology provided by results. Indeed, the number of specimens considered in present study is not enough for making some solid conclusions regarding the development of otoliths during the life cycle of the studied species, or their sexual dimorphism.

Concerning lapilli, results showed a different morphology than those reported literature from the Atlantic coast of Portugal [57, 67]. As stated by Assis, the variability was mainly related to the general otolith’s shape and the gibbus maculae dimensions. Indeed, specimens from the Ionian Sea showed a more oval and rhomboidal than triangular shape, with less bulky gibbus maculae than those shown by specimens from the Portugal coast. These differences between shape and morphological results and literature data could indicate an inter population variability of lapilli, not investigated at all in literature. Unfortunately, no references with comparable data are present in literature to assess the morphometrical distance of lapilli at inter-population level. The detected differences with the literature in morphology and shape confirm the need to improve the knowledge base on the intra-population variability of these otoliths, which nowadays are deeply underestimated [59].

Concerning asterisci, results showed a morphology in line with that reported in the literature from the Atlantic Portuguese coast [58]. Some differences were detected regarding the general shape, more oblong in the studied population and the rostrum, less evident in the studied population, than those from the literature. As stated above, for lapilli, these differences could indicate a variability at the inter-population level, until now not investigated at all in asterisci. The absence of literature on morphometrical data made it impossible to compare the morphometry of B. belone asterisci from the Ionian Sea with that from other geographical areas. As highlighted by the detected differences in morphology and shape with literature data, it is essential to improve the knowledge base on the intra-population variability of these otoliths, until now deeply underestimated [59].

At the intra-population level, statistical analyses on lapilli and asterisci did not show significant differences between left and right otoliths. Concerning size classes, especially asterisci, showed a strong correlation between otoliths morphometries (e.g., OS, OL, OW, and OP) and specimen biometrics (TL and BW), as stated by Pearson correlation results. But, as stated above, further analysis investigating a widest as possible number of specimens for each size classes are required to confirm the information regarding the intra specific variability in otoliths’ shape and morphology provided by results. The correlation between morphometries of asterisci and lapilli, and total fish length and weight could introduce a substantial variability between small and large individuals in the studied species from the Ionian Sea. This may be related to the life habit differences between life stages of B. belone, stated above, to discuss the size class differences detected in sagittae. It was widely stated that saccule and lagena are mainly involved in the perception of sound, while the utricle seems to have an important role in vestibular sense [59, 95, 96].

For this reason, sagittae, asterisci, and their end organs could be influenced by the same selective forces, explaining the more enhanced correlation of morphometries to fish total length and body weight shown by these otoliths than lapilli. These last have always been considered the most conservative of the three [57], despite Schulz-Mirbach et al. [59] having shown their variability at the inter-specific level, assessing differences also in the development of vestibular sense. Further analysis on lapilli and asterisci from different populations of the studied species, and with a vast number of samples, are required to confirm the reliability of shape, morphology, and morphometry for population discrimination and to assess the variability at intra-population between sexes and size classes.

Conclusion

Results provided the first accurate description of the three otoliths pairs of the studied species from the Ionian Sea, with the first-ever description of lapilli and asterisci from the Mediterranean Sea.

These data have confirmed the heterogeneity of sagittal morphology and morphometry between the present paper and literature, also highlighting the presence of differences in mean contour and morphometry between size classes. The absence of directional bilateral asymmetry and sexual asymmetry lets us hope for a reliable and straightforward application of shape analysis for the stock assessment on this species, which is essential for its conservation and correct management of its commercial exploitation.

Concerning lapilli and asterisci, results have confirmed the need to deepen the knowledge of these two otoliths pairs, not studied at all in the Mediterranean teleost species. They showed differences in morphometry and shape with literature data, which could indicate an intra-specific variability between specimens belonging to different populations. Improving the knowledge base on this is essential to understanding how different environments can influence the inner ear development and morphology and how the vestibular and hearing senses change between species and populations according to their life habits and adaptation to environments. Moreover, for both otolith pairs, it was not possible to investigate the variability between size classes and sexes in the studied population for lack of samples. Further analyses on a broader number of lagenar and utricular otoliths are required to analyze their variability between size classes and sexes.

Future research on the three otoliths pairs of the studied species shall investigate the reliability of shape analysis for stock assessment and population discrimination, adding data on genetics, somatic growth dynamics, and feeding habits on specimens from different geographical areas. This will be essential to find direct correlations to elucidate the dynamics influencing the inter-population differences in sagittae, lapilli, and asterisci, improving the information about the connections between inner ears, species and population genetics, and environment. This is the base of the phenotypic plasticity and the ecomorphological adaptation of teleost species, allowing the shape differences between sagittae, so crucial for stock assessments and conservation porpoises. Moreover, by deepening the knowledge base on the intra and inter-specific variability of lagenar and utricular otoliths, elucidating their variations related to genetic and environmental conditions, it will be possible to improve the information about teleost inner ear functioning and eco-morphology, opening new ways for species population discrimination.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

References

  1. Van Der Laan R, Eschmeyer WN, Fricke R. Family-group names of recent fishes. Zootaxa. 2014;3882(1):1–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nelson JS, Grande TC, Wilson MVH. Fishes of the World: Fifth Edition. Fishes of the World: Fifth Edition. 2016. 1–707 p.

  3. Collette BB. Family Belonidae Bonaparte 1832 - needlfishes. California Academy of Sciences Annotated Checklists of Fishes. 2003;16:1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Poutiers JM. Fiches fao d’identification des especes pour les besoins de la peche. Mediterranee et mer noire zone de peche 37 Révision 1 Volume 1 VEGETAUX ET INVERTEBRES. Vertebres. 1987;2.

  5. Deidun A, Zava B, Corsini-Foka M, Galdies J, Di Natale A, Collette BB. First record of the flat needlefish, Ablennes hians (Belonidae) in central mediterranean waters (western ionian sea). Annales, Series Historia Naturalis. 2021;31(1):9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alshawy F, Ibrahim A, Hussein C, Lahlah M. First record of the flat needlefish Ablennes hians (Valenciennes, 1846) from Syrian marine waters (eastern Mediterranean). Marine Biodiversity Records. 2019;12(1):410–2.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Collette BB, Parin N V. Needlefishes (Belonidae) of the Eastern Atlantic-Ocean... Danish Science Press; 1970.

  8. Froese R, Pauly D. Fish base. 2022 [cited 2022 Nov 21]. Belone belone (Linnaeus, 1760). Available from: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=126375 on 2022–11–21.

  9. Jardas I. Jadranska ihtiofauna. Školska knjiga. Zagreb. Školska knjiga; 1996. 533 p.

  10. Riede K. Global Register of Migratory Species - from Global to Regional Scales. Final Report of the R&D-Project 808 05 081. Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, Bonn, Germany. Federal Agency for Nature Conservation; 2004. 329 p.

  11. Nedelec C. FAO Catalogue of small scale fishing gear. Fishing News (Books) Ltd.; 1975. 191 p.

  12. Zorica B, Keč VČ. Age, growth and mortality of the garfish, Belone belone (L. 1761) in the Adriatic Sea. J Marine Biol Assoc United Kingdom. 2013;93(2):365–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Elsdon TS, Wells BK, Campana SE, Gillanders BM, Jones CM, Limburg KE, et al. Otolith chemistry to describe movements and life-history parameters of fishes: Hypotheses, assumptions, limitations and inferences. In: Oceanography and Marine Biology. CRC Press; 2008. p. 297–330.

  14. FAO. Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics (Capture productoin). 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bilgin S, Taşçi B, Bal H. Population dynamics of the garfish, Belone euxini (Belonidae: Belone) from the south-east Black Sea. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 2014;94(8):1687–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ouannes Ghorbel A, Bradai MN, Bouain A. Période de reproduction et maturité sexuelle de Symphodus (Crenilabrus) tinca (Labridae), des côtes de Sfax (Tunisie). Cybium. 2002;26(2):89–92.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Châari M, Boudaya L, Gancitano S, Gancitano V, Neifar L. Age, Growth and Reproductive Biology of the Garfish, Belone belone (Linnaeus, 1760) (Teleostei: Belonidae) in the Central Mediterranean Sea. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 2022;22(8).

  18. Dorman JA. Diet of the garfish, Belone belone (L.), from Courtmacsherry Bay, Ireland. J Fish Biol. 1988;33(3):339–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dorman JA. Investigations into the biology of the garfish, Belone belone (L.), Swedish waters. J Fish Biol. 1991;39(1):59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sever TM, Bayhan B, Bilge G, Taşkavak E. Diet composition of Belone belone (Linnaeus, 1761) (Pisces: Belonidae) in the Aegean Sea. J Appl Ichthyol. 2009;25(6):702–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zorica B, Cikes KV. Preliminary observations on feeding habits of Garfish Belone belone (L., 1761) in the Adriatic Sea. Croatian Journal of Fisheries. 2012;70(2):53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wurtz M, Marrale D. Food of striped dolphin, Stenella coeruleoalba, in the Ligurian sea. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 1993;73(3):571–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Albano M, D’Iglio C, Spanò N, Fernandes JM de O, Savoca S, Capillo G. Distribution of the Order Lampriformes in the Mediterranean Sea with Notes on Their Biology, Morphology, and Taxonomy. Biology. 2022;11.

  24. Albano M, D’Iglio C, Spanò N, Di Paola D, Alesci A, Savoca S, et al. New Report of Zu cristatus (Bonelli, 1819) in the Ionian Sea with an In-Depth Morphometrical Comparison with All Mediterranean Records. Fishes. 2022;7:305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Samsun O, Özdamar E, Erkoyuncu I. Sinopyöresinde avlanan zargana (Belone belone euxini, Günther, 1866) balığının bazı balıkçılık biyolojisi parametreleri ile et veriminin araştırılması. Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi II Su Ürünleri Sempozyumu, Atatürk Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Su Ürünleri Bölümü, Erzurum. 1995;14–6.

  26. Bilgin S, Taşçı B, Bal H. Reproduction biology of the garfish, Belone euxini Günther, 1866 (Belonidae: Belone) in the southeast Black Sea. Turk J Fish Aquat Sci. 2014;14(3):623–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ceyhan T, Samsun O, Akyol O. Age, growth and mortality of Garfish, Belone euxini Günther, 1866 in the Central Black Sea, Turkey. Pakistan J Zool. 2019;51(1):273–8.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Uçkun D, Akalin S, Taşkavak E, Toǧulga M. Some biological characteristics of the garfish (Belone belone L., 1761) in Izmir Bay, Aegean Sea. J Appl Ichthyol. 2004;20(5):413–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fehri-Bedoui R, Gharbi K. Contribution a l’etude de la croissance et l’age de Belone belone (Belonidae) des cotes Est de la Tunisie. Rapports de la Commission Internationale pour la Mer Mediterranee. 2004;37:352.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Châari M, Feki M, Neifar L. Metazoan Parasites of the Mediterranean Garfish Belone belone gracilis (Teleostei: Belonidae) as a Tool for Stock Discrimination. Open J Mar Sci. 2015;05(03):324–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ramírez-Pérez JS, Quiñónez-Velazquez C, García-Rodríguez FJ, Félix-Uraga R, Melo-Barrera FN. Using the shape of Sagitta Otoliths in the discrimination of phenotypic stocks in Scomberomorus sierra (Jordan and Starks, 1895). Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science. 2010;

  32. DeVries DA, Grimes CB, Prager MH. Using otolith shape analysis to distinguish eastern Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Ocean stocks of king mackerel. Fish Res. 2002;57(1):51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Benzinou A, Carbini S, Nasreddine K, Elleboode R, Mahé K. Discriminating stocks of striped red mullet (Mullus surmuletus) in the Northwest European seas using three automatic shape classification methods. Fish Res. 2013;143:153–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhuang L, Ye Z, Zhang C, Ye Z, Li Z, Wan R, et al. Stock discrimination of two insular populations of Diplodus annularis (Actinopterygii: Perciformes: Sparidae) along the coast of Tunisia by analysis of otolith shape. J Fish Biol. 2015;46(1):1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mahé K, Evano H, Mille T, Muths D, Bourjea J. Otolith shape as a valuable tool to evaluate the stock structure of swordfish Xiphias gladius in the Indian Ocean. Afr J Mar Sci. 2016;38(4):457–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Perdichizzi A, D’Iglio C, Giordano D, Profeta A, Ragonese S, Rinelli P. Comparing life-history traits in two contiguous stocks of the deep-water rose shrimp Parapenaeus longirostris (H. Lucas, 1846) (Crustacea: Decapoda) in the Southern Tyrrhenian Sea (Central Mediterranean Sea). Fish Res. 2022;248:106206.

  37. Schulz-Mirbach T, Ladich F, Plath M, Heß M. Enigmatic ear stones: what we know about the functional role and evolution of fish otoliths. Biol Rev. 2019;94(2):457–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ladich F, Schulz-Mirbach T. Diversity in fish auditory systems: one of the riddles of sensory biology. Front Ecol Evol. 2016;4:28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Schulz-Mirbach T, Ladich F, Plath M, Heß M. Enigmatic ear stones: what we know about the functional role and evolution of fish otoliths. Biol Rev. 2019;94(2):457–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Campana SE. Chemistry and composition of fish otoliths: Pathways, mechanisms and applications. Mar Ecol Prog Series. 1999;188:263–97.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Popper AN, Ramcharitar J, Campana SE. Why otoliths? Insights from inner ear physiology and fisheries biology. Mar Freshw Res. 2005;56(5):497–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. D’iglio C, Natale S, Albano M, Savoca S, Famulari S, Gervasi C, et al. Otolith Analyses Highlight Morpho-Functional Differences of Three Species of Mullet (Mugilidae) from Transitional Water. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2022;14.

  43. D’Iglio C, Porcino N, Savoca S, Profeta A, Perdichizzi A, ArmeliMinicante E, et al. Ontogenetic shift and feeding habits of the European hake (Merluccius merluccius L., 1758) in Central and Southern Tyrrhenian Sea (Western Mediterranean Sea): a comparison between past and present data. Ecol Evol. 2022;12(3):e8634.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. D’Iglio C, Albano M, Famulari S, Savoca S, Panarello G, Di Paola D, et al. Intra- and interspecific variability among congeneric Pagellus otoliths. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):16315.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Bostanci D, Yilmaz M, Yedier S, Kurucu G, Kontas S, Darçin M, et al. Sagittal Otolith Morphology of Sharpsnout Seabream Diplodus puntazzo (Walbaum, 1792) in the Aegean Sea. International Journal of Morphology. 2016.

  46. Montanini S, Stagioni M, Valdrè G, Tommasini S, Vallisneri M. Intra-specific and inter-specific variability of the sulcus acusticus of sagittal otoliths in two gurnard species (Scorpaeniformes, Triglidae). Fish Res. 2015;161:93–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Tuset VM, Rosin PL, Lombarte A. Sagittal otolith shape used in the identification of fishes of the genus Serranus. Fish Res. 2006;81(2–3):316–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Campana SE, Thorrold SR. Otoliths, increments, and elements: Keys to a comprehensive understanding of fish populations? Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2001;58(1):30–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Neves J, Giacomello E, Menezes GM, Fontes J, Tanner SE. Temperature-Driven Growth Variation in a Deep-Sea Fish: The Case of Pagellus bogaraveo (Brünnich, 1768) in the Azores Archipelago. Front Marine Sci. 2021;18.

  50. Abaad M, Tuset VM, Montero D, Lombarte A, Otero-Ferrer JL, Haroun R. Phenotypic plasticity in wild marine fishes associated with fish-cage aquaculture. Hydrobiologia. 2016;765(1):343–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Lombarte A, Miletić M, Kovačić M, Otero-Ferrer JL, Tuset VM. Identifying sagittal otoliths of Mediterranean Sea gobies: variability among phylogenetic lineages. J Fish Biol. 2018;92(6):1768–87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Lin CH, Girone A, Nolf D. Fish otolith assemblages from Recent NE Atlantic sea bottoms: a comparative study of palaeoecology. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 2016;446:98–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Nolf D. Studies on fossil otoliths - the state of the art. Recent Dev Fish Otolith Res. 1995;19:513–44.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Lombarte A, Tuset VM. Chapter3- Morfometría de otolitos. In: Volpedo AV, Vaz-dos-Santos AM, editors. Métodos de estudios con otolitos: principios y aplicaciones/ Métodos de estudos com otólitos: princípios e aplicações. 1a ed. edi. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires; 2015. p. 31.

  55. Popper AN, Lu Z. Structure-function relationships in fish otolith organs. Fish Res. 2000;46(1–3):15–25.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. D’Iglio C, Famulari S, Albano M, Carnevale A, Di Fresco D, Costanzo M, et al. Intraspecific variability of the saccular and utricular otoliths of the hatchetfish Argyropelecus hemigymnus (Cocco, 1829) from the Strait of Messina (Central Mediterranean Sea). PLoS ONE. 2023;18(2 February):1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Assis CA. The utricular otoliths, lapilli, of teleosts: their morphology and relevance for species identification and systematics studies. Sci Mar. 2005;69(2):259–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Assis CA. The lagenar otoliths of teleosts: their morphology and its application in species identification, phylogeny and systematics. J Fish Biol. 2003;62(6):1268–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Schulz-Mirbach T, Plath M. All good things come in threes–species delimitation through shape analysis of saccular, lagenar and utricular otoliths. Mar Freshw Res. 2012;63(10):934–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Schulz-Mirbach T, Riesch R, García de León FJ, Plath M. Effects of extreme habitat conditions on otolith morphology - a case study on extremophile livebearing fishes (Poecilia mexicana, P. sulphuraria). Zoology. 2011;114(6):321–34.

  61. Schulz-Mirbach T, Ladich F, Riesch R, Plath M. Otolith morphology and hearing abilities in cave- and surface-dwelling ecotypes of the Atlantic molly, Poecilia mexicana (Teleostei: Poeciliidae). Hear Res. 2010;267(1–2):137–48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Zorica B, Sinovčić G, Keč VČ. Preliminary data on the study of otolith morphology of five pelagic fish species from the Adriatic Sea (Croatia). Acta Adriat. 2010;51(1):89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Bal H, Türker D, Zengin K. Morphological characteristics of otolith for four fish species in the Edremit Gulf, Aegean Sea, Turkey. Iranian J Ichthyol. 2018;5(4):303–11.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Kasapoglu N, Duzgunes E. Otolith atlas for the black sea. J Environ Prot Ecol. 2015;16(1):133–44.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Altin A, Ayyildiz H. Relationships between total length and otolith measurements for 36 fish species from Gökçeada Island, Turkey. J Appl Ichthyol. 2018;34(1):136–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Tuset VM, Lombarte A, Assis CA. Otolith atlas for the western Mediterranean, north and central eastern Atlantic. Sci Mar. 2008;72(SUPPL. 1):7–198.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Assis CA. Estudo morfológico dos otólitos sagitta, asteriscus e lapillus de Teleóstei (Actinopterygii, Teleostei) de Portugal continental. Sua aplicação em estudos de filogenia, sistematica e ecologia. Ecologia. Universidade de Lisboa (Portugal); 2000. p. 1005.

  68. FAO. Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics. (Global capture production 1950–2020) (FishStatJ). FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department (online). Rome; Italy: FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Division; 2022.

  69. Soeth M, Daros FA, Correia AT, Fabré NN, Medeiros R, Feitosa CV, et al. Otolith phenotypic variation as an indicator of stock structure of Scomberomorus brasiliensis from the southwestern Atlantic Ocean. Fish Res. 2022;252:106357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Lennox RJ, Paukert CP, Aarestrup K, Auger-Méthé M, Baumgartner L, Birnie-Gauvin K, et al. One hundred pressing questions on the future of global fish migration science, conservation, and policy. Front Ecol Evol. 2019;7:286.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  71. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):671–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Jawad LA, Sabatino G, Ibáñez AL, Andaloro F, Battaglia P. Morphology and ontogenetic changes in otoliths of the mesopelagic fishes Ceratoscopelus maderensis (Myctophidae), Vinciguerria attenuata and V. poweriae (Phosichthyidae) from the Strait of Messina (Mediterranean Sea). Acta Zoologica. 2018;

  73. Pavlov DA. Differentiation of three species of the genus Upeneus (Mullidae) based on otolith shape analysis. J Ichthyol. 2016;56(1):37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Pavlov DA. Otolith morphology and relationships of several fish species of the Suborder Scorpaenoidei. J Ichthyol. 2021;61(1):33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Tuset VM, Lozano IJ, Gonzĺez JA, Pertusa JF, García-Díaz MM. Shape indices to identify regional differences in otolith morphology of comber, Serranus cabrilla (L., 1758). J Appl Ichthyol. 2003;19(2):88–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Tuset VM, Lombarte A, González JA, Pertusa JF, Lorente MJ. Comparative morphology of the sagittal otolith in Serranus spp. J Fish Biol. 2003;63(6):1491–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Tuset VM, Farré M, Otero-Ferrer JL, Vilar A, Morales-Nin B, Lombarte A. Testing otolith morphology for measuring marine fish biodiversity. Mar Freshw Res. 2016;67(7):1037–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Libungan LA, Pálsson S. ShapeR: an R package to study otolith shape variation among fish populations. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Nolf D. Otolithi Piscium. Handbook of Paleoichthyology, Vol. 10. Fischer G, editor. Stuttgart, New York; 1985. 145 p.

  80. Altin A, Ayyildiz H. Relationships between total length and otolith measurements for 36 fish species from Gökçeada Island, Turkey. J Appl Ichthyology. 2018;34(1):136–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Neves J, Silva AA, Moreno A, Veríssimo A, Santos AM, Garrido S. Population structure of the European sardine Sardina pilchardus from Atlantic and Mediterranean waters based on otolith shape analysis. Fish Res. 2021;243:106050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Vignon M, Morat F. Environmental and genetic determinant of otolith shape revealed by a non-indigenous tropical fish. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2010;411:231–41.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  83. Tuset VM, Otero-Ferrer JL, Gómez-Zurita J, Venerus LA, Stransky C, Imondi R, et al. Otolith shape lends support to the sensory drive hypothesis in rockfishes. J Evol Biol. 2016;29(10):2083–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Assis IO, da Silva VEL, Souto-Vieira D, Lozano AP, Volpedo AV, Fabré NN. Ecomorphological patterns in otoliths of tropical fishes: assessing trophic groups and depth strata preference by shape. Environ Biol Fishes. 2020;103(4):349–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Lombarte A, Cruz A. Otolith size trends in marine fish communities from different depth strata. J Fish Biol. 2007;71(1):53–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Zhuang L, Ye Z, Zhang C. Application of otolith shape analysis to species separation in Sebastes spp. from the Bohai Sea and the Yellow Sea, northwest Pacific. Environ Biol Fishes. 2015;98(2):547–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Nazir A, Khan MA. Using otoliths for fish stock discrimination: status and challenges. Acta Ichthyol Piscat. 2021;51(2):199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Barnes TC, Gillanders BM. Combined effects of extrinsic and intrinsic factors on otolith chemistry: Implications for environmental reconstructions. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2013;70(8):1159–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Clarke LM, Conover DO, Thorrold SR. Population differences in otolith chemistry have a genetic basis in menidia menidia. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2011;68(1):105–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Howarth LM, Waggitt JJ, Bolam SG, Eggleton J, Somerfield PJ, Hiddink JG. Effects of bottom trawling and primary production on the composition of biological traits in benthic assemblages. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2018;602:31–48.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Jobling M. Temperature and growth: modulation of growth rate via temperature change. Global Warming. 2011;225–54.

  92. Mahé K, Ider D, Massaro A, Hamed O, Jurado-Ruzafa A, Gonçalves P, et al. Directional bilateral asymmetry in otolith morphology may affect fish stock discrimination based on otolith shape analysis. ICES J Mar Sci. 2019;76(1):232–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Díaz-Gil C, Palmer M, Catalán IA, Alós J, Fuiman LA, García E, et al. Otolith fluctuating asymmetry: a misconception of its biological relevance? ICES J Mar Sci. 2015;72(7):2079–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Mille T, Ernande B, Pontual H de, Villanueva C, Mahé K. Sources of otolith morphology variation at the intra-population level : directional asymmetry and diet marine fishes. In: SFI Days. 2016. p. 2016.

  95. Popper AN. Auditory system morphology. In: Farrell AP, editor. Encyclopedia of Fish Physiology: from Genome to Environment. San Diego: Academic Press; 2011. p. 252–61.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  96. Popper AN, Schilt CR. Hearing and Acoustic Behavior: Basic and Applied Considerations. Fish Bioacoustics. 2008;17–48.

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Claudio D’Iglio and Marco Albano contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of Messina, Viale Ferdinando Stagno d’Alcontres 31, 98166, Messina, Italy

    Claudio D’Iglio, Sergio Famulari, Alex Carnevale, Serena Savoca & Nunziacarla Spanò

  2. Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, Polo Universitario Dell’Annunziata, 98168, Messina, Italy

    Marco Albano & Gioele Capillo

Authors
  1. Claudio D’Iglio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marco Albano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sergio Famulari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alex Carnevale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Serena Savoca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nunziacarla Spanò
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Gioele Capillo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CDI, Writing-Original draft, Investigation; MA, Writing-Original draft, Investigation; SF, Software, Data curation; AC, Methodology; SS, Data analysis, Writing—review & editing; NS, Visualization, Funding acquisition; GC, Conceptualization, Supervision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serena Savoca.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

D’Iglio, C., Albano, M., Famulari, S. et al. Intra-population variability of the saccular, utricular and lagenar otoliths of the garfish Belone belone (Linnaeus, 1760) from South-Western Ionian Sea (Central Mediterranean Sea). BMC Ecol Evo 24, 31 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-024-02219-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-024-02219-0

Keywords

BMC Ecology and Evolution

ISSN: 2730-7182

Contact us