Open Access

Comparative Phylogeography of Ethiopian anurans: impact of the Great Rift Valley and Pleistocene climate change

BMC Evolutionary BiologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:206

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-016-0774-1

Received: 11 May 2016

Accepted: 28 September 2016

Published: 10 October 2016

Abstract

Background

The Ethiopian highlands are a biodiversity hotspot, split by the Great Rift Valley into two distinct systems of plateaus and mountains. The Rift Valley is currently hot and dry and acts as a barrier to gene flow for highland-adapted species. It is however unlikely that the conditions in the Rift were inhospitable to highland species during the entire Pleistocene. To assess the significance of the Ethiopian Rift as a biogeographic barrier as well as the impact Pleistocene climatic changes have had on the evolution of Ethiopian organisms, we performed phylogeographic analyses and developed present and past niche models on seven anuran species with different elevational and ecological preferences.

Results

We found that highland species on the east and the west sides of the Rift are genetically differentiated and have not experienced any detectable gene flow for at least 0.4 my. In contrast, species found at elevations lower than 2500 m do not show any population structure. We also determined that highland species have lower effective population sizes than lowland species, which have experienced a large, yet gradual, demographic expansion, starting approximately half a million year ago.

Conclusions

The pattern we report here is consistent with the increasingly warmer and drier conditions of the Pleistocene in East Africa, which resulted in the expansion of savanna, the fragmentation of forests and the shrinking of highland habitats. Climatic niche models indicated that the Rift is currently non suitable for most of the studied species, but it could have been a more permeable barrier during the Last Glacial Maximum. However, considering the strong genetic structure of highland species, we hypothesize that the barrier mechanisms at the Rift are not only climatic but also topographical.

Keywords

East Africa Ethiopia Great Rift Valley Phylogeography Anura Tomopterna Amietia Leptopelis Ptychadena

Background

The Ethiopian highlands constitute the largest continuous mountain system in Africa. These highlands are a biodiversity hotspot [1], particularly for amphibians as ~40 % of the species found in the highlands are endemic [2, 3]. The Ethiopian highlands are split by the Great Rift Valley (GRV) in two systems of plateaus and mountains: the Western highlands (or Abyssinian massif) and the Eastern highlands (or Harar massif). The GRV is the result of the splitting of the African plate into two, which began ~20 my ago [4, 5]. The climatic conditions on the highlands are relatively cool and humid while the GRV and the low-elevation areas surrounding the highlands are dry and hot, but this was not always the case. Since the late Miocene, the climate of East Africa has become increasingly arid and unstable [5, 6], with dry periods alternating with wet ones [610], coinciding with glaciations at northern latitudes [11]. For the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM, 23–18 ka before present) different global circulation models, such as those used in this work (see Methods), predict cooler and wetter conditions for East Africa, including the Ethiopian highlands ([12] but see [10]). These climatic cycles are expected to have promoted changes in the connectivity across the GRV and thus affected the possibility of gene flow between the Western and Eastern highlands. During drier periods the GRV could have acted as a barrier to dispersal for highland-adapted species as their distribution was being pushed to higher elevations. When the climate was wetter, however, highland species could have expanded their distribution toward low elevations and could have eventually dispersed across the GRV.

The effect the GRV had on population structure has been investigated in a handful of species, including charismatic taxa such as the Ethiopian wolf, the gelada baboon and the giant lobelia [1315]. In all species examined, there is a clear genetic break between populations situated on the East and the West of the GRV, suggesting the Rift constitutes a major barrier to dispersal in these organisms. However, the east-west genetic break is recent in the Ethiopian wolf and probably followed the last de-glaciation event 15,000 years ago [13], whereas populations of the frogs Xenopus clivii and X. largeni have been isolated on each sides of the Rift for ~1–3.5 million years, with little or no migration [16]. At this point, the significance of the GRV as a biogeographic barrier has been examined in a very small number of species and further comparative studies are necessary to determine how the Rift Valley has affected dispersal in organisms with different ecological requirements.

We decided to examine the impact the GRV has had on the population structure of seven frog species with different ecology, behavior and habitat preference: Amietia sp., Leptopelis gramineus, Tomopterna kachowskii, Ptychadena cooperi, P. erlangeri and two recently identified cryptic species, P. cf. neumanni 1 and P. cf. neumanni 2 [17]. The systematics of frogs belonging to the genus Amietia is still debated. Although populations from Ethiopia have been assigned to the species Amietia angolensis [2, 3], it is highly likely that this name recovers a species complex [18, 19] and that Ethiopian populations belong to a separate species. We refer to those frogs as Amietia sp. until their systematics has been resolved. Amietia sp. is relatively abundant on the Ethiopian plateaus, east and west of the Rift, and is exclusively found along large perennial streams [3]. Based on our observations, Amietia sp. is absent from the GRV and from the low elevation areas surrounding the Ethiopian highlands. Leptopelis gramineus is a fossorial and secretive species which is endemic to Ethiopia [3]. This species is commonly found on the plateaus but it can also reach high elevations, having been reported in the afro-alpine habitat. It is also found in the tropical humid forests of the Kaffa zone (southwest Ethiopia) and in the forests flanking the southern portion of the eastern highlands, only avoiding dry areas, such as the floor of the GRV. Tomopterna kachowskii is endemic to the horn of Africa and belongs to a genus commonly referred as sand frogs [20]. It has been collected at intermediate elevations on both side of the GRV and on the floor of the GRV, indicating it can tolerate dry conditions [20]. Frogs of this genus are known to survive dry conditions by digging burrows in sandy soils (hence their name) where they can aestivate for extended periods of time [21]. The four Ptychadena species analyzed here have a very low tolerance to dry conditions and are therefore absent from savannas and other arid environments. Ptychadena cf. neumanni 1 and 2 are typical grassland species that differ by their elevational range; P. cf, neumanni 1 is found exclusively below 2500 m while P. cf. neumanni 2 occurs between 2500 and 3100 m. Ptychadena cf. neumanni 1 is also found in clearings in the tropical humid forests of Kaffa. Ptychadena erlangeri is typically found in the moist evergreen forests of the Kaffa zone where it occurs in sympatry with P. cf. neumanni 1, although these two species differ in size and tend to occupy different micro-habitats [3, 17]. Ptychadena cooperi is the largest species of the genus analyzed here. It is found at elevations between 2400 and 3100 m and favors slow-running streams and large ponds. We performed a phylogeographic analysis of these seven taxa using a combination of mitochondrial and nuclear loci and we inferred the impact the GRV has had on their genetic structure. Results from phylogeographic analyses were complemented with the estimation of the changes in habitat suitability that occurred between the present time and the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), as assessed by means of ecological niche modeling [22].

Results

Highland species: Amietia sp., Ptychadena cooperi and Ptychadena cf. neumanni 2

Ptychadena cf. neumanni 2, P. cooperi and Amietia sp. were collected in the Ethiopian highlands, on both sides of the GRV, at elevations between 2364 and 3087 m asl. Although these three species are found in the same elevational range, they differ considerably in their use of microhabitats. Ptychadena cf. neumanni 2 was collected in flooded grasslands, while Amietia sp. was found exclusively in large perennial streams. Ptychadena cooperi was always found near water, usually large ponds and slow running streams and rarely in flooded grasslands and never in the large streams favored by Amietia sp.

Ecological Niche Models (ENM) for these three species showed high AUC values, particularly for Ptychadena cf. neumanni 2 and P. cooperi (Table 1). Predicted distribution ranges for the present time were similar among the three species and indicate that current favorable conditions are limited to the highlands (Fig. 1). ENMs indicated that the GRV is not a suitable area for any of these species at the present time. Projection of the ENMs for the LGM suggested that populations of P. cooperi and Amietia sp. east and west of the GRV could have been connected, whereas the GRV was probably not climatically suitable for P. cf. neumanni 2 (Fig. 1).
Table 1

Number of occurrence data (2.5 min pixels) employed for the ENM and AUC evaluation metric of the ENM for the different species

 

Presence

AUC

Amietia sp.

13

0.875

P. cooperi

18

0.965

P. cf. neumanni 2

15

0.968

L. gramineus

24

0.913

P. erlangeri

17

0.877

P. cf. neumanni 1

24

0.869

T. kachowskii

16

0.699

Fig. 1

Predicted distribution of the seven species for the present time and the LGM as assessed from ecological niche modeling. For the LGM, the color gradient indicates for each pixel the number of scenarios (out of three) that predict that pixel to be part of the distribution range. The red squares indicate occurrence of each species. In grey are those pixels where the predictions under the three scenarios are uncertain due to non-analogous climatic conditions (see Methods for details)

All phylogenetic analyses of the mitochondrial sequences revealed similar patterns between the three species, with a clear clustering of mitochondrial haplotypes from the same side of the GRV (Fig. 2; only the BEAST analyses are shown). In P. cf. neumanni 2, the 14 mitochondrial haplotypes cluster into two well supported clades corresponding perfectly to the geographical origin of the samples, one clade containing all the frogs collected in the west and the other one the frogs from the east of the GRV (Fig. 2). In Amietia sp., we recovered a similar east-west split but we identified a divergent clade corresponding to populations located north of the Blue Nile valley (Fig. 3). In P. cooperi, we recovered only 6 haplotypes, 4 of which are unique to the west (Fig. 2). The western haplotypes form a monophyletic clade, which is nested within a paraphyletic eastern group. The two eastern haplotypes have distinct geographic distribution, one being widespread on the plateau while the most divergent one is found at high elevation in the Bale massif. The average divergence between the western and the eastern populations are similar among species with values of 1.3, 1.8 and 2.0 % in Amietia sp., P. cf. neumanni 2 and P. cooperi, respectively. The AMOVAs based on the mitochondrial data confirm the east-west split since a significant amount of the variance was explained by among group variation, the groups being defined as the populations east and west of the GRV (Table 2).
Fig. 2

Mitochondrial phylogeny of Ethiopian anurans constructed using BEAST, maps of Ethiopia showing collecting localities and pictures of the organisms. The numbers at the nodes correspond to posterior probability values. Trees are not to scale

Fig. 3

a Mitochondrial phylogeny of Amietia sp. constructed using BEAST. The numbers at the nodes correspond to posterior probability values. The boxed number corresponds to the age of the nodes. b Map showing the origin of the samples. C. Population phylogeny reconstructed using *BEAST. The boxed numbers correspond to the nodes age calibrated using the ND2 mutation rate (0.957 %)

Table 2

Mitochondrial and nuclear DNA hierarchical analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) and coefficient of differentiation between east and west populations. Groups were defined a priori and contain populations east and west of the GRV

Source of variation

Mitochondrial DNA

Nuclear DNA

F st east-west

% of variation

P-value

% of variation

P-value

All nuclear loci

Amietia sp.

 Among groups

84.99

0.0127

69.89

0.0098

0.644

 Within groups

10.84

0.0039

6.79

0.0019

 

 Within populations

4.16

0.0000

23.32

0.0000

 

Ptychadena cooperi

 Among groups

47.11

0.0362

61.68

0.0049

0.634

 Within groups

50.53

0.0000

7.21

0.0000

 

 Within populations

2.36

0.0000

31.12

0.0000

 

Ptychadena cf. neumanni 2

 Among groups

76.57

0.0039

38.31

0.0088

0.410

 Within groups

10.54

0.0000

7.93

0.0000

 

 Within populations

12.89

0.0000

53.76

0.0000

 

Leptopelis gramineus

 Among groups

52.15

0.0039

47.76

0.0049

0.504

 Within groups

34.01

0.0000

12.55

0.0000

 

 Within populations

13.84

0.0000

39.68

0.0000

 

Ptychadena erlangeri

 Among groups

−13.33

0.4946

4.13

0.0958

0.061

 Within groups

23.19

0.1906

3.86

0.0498

 

 Within populations

90.14

0.1740

92.01

0.0020

 

Tomopterna kachowskii

 Among groups

−13.97

0.9990

−0.18

0.4624

0.024

 Within groups

46.56

0.0000

1.08

0.3617

 

 Within populations

67.41

0.0000

99.1

0.3724

 
The amount of nuclear variation differs substantially among species and tends to be higher in P. cf. neumanni 2 (38 SNPs in total) than in P. cooperi (17 SNPs) and Amietia sp. (17 SNPs), which exhibit similar level of variation (Table 3). Despite an overall low level of variation, the nuclear datasets contain significant phylogeographic information, including a number of SNPs that are diagnostic of the populations east and west of the GRV. For instance, a SNP in Rag-1 is diagnostic of the western populations of P. cooperi and two SNPs in BDNF and Tyr are diagnostic of the western population in Amietia sp.. Consistent with the presence of population-specific SNPs, the Structure and Structurama analyses strongly support the existence of two gene pools separated by the GRV in all three species (Table 4). The genetic differentiation between east and west is also confirmed by the AMOVA analysis (Table 1), which estimated that a large and significant fraction of the genetic variance is found among groups. Finally, the F st values calculated on a concatenated nuclear dataset are high and significant for all species (Table 2). Together, the mitochondrial and nuclear data strongly support the presence of two distinct geographic populations separated by the GRV. The presence of a third population north of the Nile in Amietia sp. was not recovered by the Structurama and Structure analyses, probably because of the small number of loci used and the low nuclear variation recovered in this species. However, the high and significant F st values (Table 5) suggest that the population north of the Nile is indeed genetically differentiated from the other two (Fig. 3).
Table 3

Summary statistics of diversity and differentiation for mitochondrial and nuclear genes

Ametia sp.

 

ND2

Rag-1

Tyr

BDNF

    

West

East

West

East

West

East

West

East

    

 N

12

19

14

28

22

32

24

26

    

 S

13

24

2

2

3

3

1

1

    

 Π

0.239

0.399

0.085

0.105

0.108

0.074

0.07

0.026

    

 θ

0.447

0.715

0.08

0.065

0.152

0.138

0.048

0.047

    

 Tajima’s D

−0.213

−1.723

0.179

1.268

−0.749

−1.079

−0.741

0.363

    

 Fu’s F

1.885

0.297

1.475

0.987

−0.271

−1.225

−0.381

0.394

    

F st

0.761

0.449

0.646

0.176

    

Ptychadena cooperi

 

COI

CXCR4

NCX1

Rag-1

Tyr

  

West

East

West

East

West

East

West

East

West

East

  

 N

21

10

60

26

62

22

62

16

62

24

  

 S

3

15

4

2

4

1

3

1

2

5

  

 Π

0.182

2.518

0.143

0.065

0.033

0.016

0.031

0.049

0.158

0.464

  

 θ

0.339

1.907

0.192

0.117

0.150

0.048

0.152

0.119

0.129

0.405

  

 Tajima’s D

−1.217

1.475

−0.558

−0.960

−1.684

−1.162

−1.576

−1.162

0.381

0.427

  

 Fu’s F

−1.770

9.345

−1.176

−1.046

−2.975

−0.957

−3.984

−0.700

0.591

−1.672

  

F st

0.478

0.712

0.001

0.942

0.275

  

Ptychadena cf.neumanni 2

 

COI

CXCR4

NCX1

Rag-1

Tyr

  

West

East

West

East

West

East

West

East

West

East

  

 N

36

24

80

62

76

54

64

60

78

62

  

 S

8

9

3

7

3

5

7

14

3

10

  

 Π

0.307

0.447

0.032

0.111

0.064

0.667

0.196

0.865

0.320

1.006

  

 θ

0.694

0.867

0.135

0.381

0.102

0.193

0.327

0.629

0.216

0.710

  

 Tajima’s D

−1.625

−1.588

−1.416

−1.859

−0.708

−1.533

−1.014

1.103

0.910

1.150

  

 Fu’s F

−1.896

−3.562

0.021

−4.412

−1.185

−5.661

−0.230

1.386

−0.011

−1.157

  

F st

0.793

0.039

0.016

0.274

0.555

  

Leptopelis gramineus

 

COI

Rag-2

NCX1

Rag-1

Tyr

BDNF

West

East

West

East

West

East

West

East

West

East

West

East

 N

9

16

18

50

18

48

18

50

18

40

18

50

 S

18

68

4

23

1

10

8

19

7

15

3

5

 Π

1.275

4.118

0.252

0.463

0.02

0.269

0.279

0.361

0.353

0.511

0.149

0.121

 θ

1.299

4.195

0.205

1.019

0.053

0.407

0.333

0.605

0.458

0.851

0.19

0.279

 Tajima’s D (East = Arsi)

−0.267

−0.585

0.676

−1.232

−1.165

−1.524*

−0.565

−1.209

−1.042

−0.278

−0.591

−0.964

 Fu’s F (East = Arsi)

−2.843

−1.987

−0.362

−4.967*

−0.794

−2.113

0.444

−4.455*

−1.584

−5.203*

−0.964

−2.707*

F st

0.537

0.125

0.077

0.561

0.353

0.008

Ptychadena erlangeri

 

COI

CXCR4

NCX1

Rag-1

Tyr

  

West

East

West

East

West

East

West

East

West

East

  

 N

28

8

68

20

60

18

68

16

70

16

  

 S

40

7

15

5

7

0

15

11

29

11

  

 Π

2.024

0.503

0.366

0.269

0.104

NA

0.493

0.625

1.261

0.743

  

 θ

3.790

0.690

0.794

0.38

0.266

NA

0.690

0.695

2.048

0.730

  

 Tajima’s D

−1.740

−1.309

−1.634

−0.965

−1.561

NA

−0.832

−0.378

−1.221

0.068

  

 Fu’s F

−0.039

−2.317

−12.096

−2.94

−5.153

NA

−5.004

−1.501

−27.296

−1.120

  

F st

0.029

0.055

0.032

0.029

0.109

  

Ptychadena cf. neumanni 1

 

COI

CXCR4

NCX1

Rag-1

Tyr

  

West

East

West

East

West

East

West

East

West

East

  

 N

49

 

126

 

114

 

118

 

122

   

 S

8

 

9

 

5

 

12

 

20

   

 Π

0.322

 

0.253

 

0.121

 

0.264

 

0.859

   

 θ

0.645

 

0.372

 

0.166

 

0.575

 

1.348

   

 Tajima’s D

−1.371

 

−0.775

 

−0.567

 

−1.426

 

−1.024

   

 Fu’s F

1.073

 

−2.142

 

−2.409

 

−6.391

 

−12.296

   

Tomopterna kachowskii

 

COI

SLC8A3

NCX1

Rag-1

BDNF

  

West

East

West

East

West

East

West

East

West

East

  

 N

21

15

50

30

44

30

46

28

42

30

  

 S

16

22

5

2

9

9

8

6

4

3

  

 Π

1.062

1.135

0.151

0.042

0.231

0.193

0.454

0.358

0.215

0.214

  

 Θ

0.884

1.401

0.299

0.109

0.448

0.287

0.462

0.325

0.204

0.168

  

 Tajima’s D

−1.257

−2.176 *

−1.2006

−1.2555

−1.3893

−1.0164

−0.053

0.2998

0.1256

0.6543

  

 Fu’s F

0.358

−0.697

−1.661

−1.021

−0.976

−1.142

−3.341

−1.995

0.003

1.002

  

F st

−0.017

0.109

0.001

−0.028

−0.015

  

N number of individuals, S number of SNPs, Π nucleotide diversity, θ Waterson’s estimator of diversity. Values of Tajima’s D and Fu’s F that are significantly different from 0 are indicated with *

Table 4

Structure and Structurama analysis based on nuclear loci

Species

K

Structure

Structurama

lnP

Pr(K|X)

ΔK

Amietia sp.

1

−296.98

0.00

NA

0.00

2

−169.80

0.00

1292.20

0.99

3

−171.84

0.00

12.22

0.01

4

−153.88

0.99

15.80

0.00

5

−172.26

0.00

2.67

0.00

6

−182.58

0.00

NA

0.00

Ptychadena cooperi

1

−423.72

0.00

N/A

0.00

2

−265.46

1.00

2725.83

1.00

3

−256.50

0.00

10.76

0.00

4

−255.52

0.00

6.82

0.00

5

−264.68

0.00

0.83

0.00

6

−277.18

0.00

N/A

0.00

Ptychadena cf. neumanni 2

1

−1471.56

0.00

N/A

0.00

2

−1035.66

0.99

422.87

1.00

3

−797.20

0.00

182.78

0.00

4

−741.52

0.00

2.90

0.00

5

−745.58

0.00

0.95

0.00

6

−700.80

0.00

N/A

0.00

Leptopelis gramineus

1

−1446.66

0.00

NA

0.00

2

−1072.24

0.00

514.90

1.00

3

−978.90

0.00

2.69

0.00

4

−1018.82

0.00

0.68

0.00

5

−888.98

0.00

5.66

0.00

6

−869.12

0.99

NA

0.00

Ptychadena erlangeri

1

−1303.78

1.00

N/A

1.00

2

−1304.78

0.00

57.06

0.00

3

−1438.96

0.00

5.60

0.00

4

−1312.12

0.00

4.79

0.00

5

−1346.86

0.00

22.13

0.00

6

−1311.38

0.00

N/A

0.00

Ptychadena cf. neumanni 1

1

−1074.62

1.00

N/A

1.00

2

−1034.38

0.00

62.15

0.00

3

−1032.80

0.00

10.43

0.00

4

−1033.88

0.00

0.70

0.00

5

−1035.16

0.00

1.81

0.00

6

−1035.86

0.00

N/A

0.00

Tomopterna kachowskii

1

−513.10

0.99

NA

0.99

2

−529.50

0.00

13.76

0.01

3

−628.72

0.00

0.70

0.00

4

−665.20

0.00

0.34

0.00

5

−719.50

0.00

2.65

0.00

6

−632.14

0.00

NA

0.00

For Structure, the probability of each K given the data (Pr(K|X)) was calculated using the ad hoc method described by Pritchard et al. [39]. The optimal number of K was also determined using the ΔK method of Evanno et al. [40]. For the Structurama we present the posterior probability assuming a gamma hyper-prior G(2.5,0.5)

Table 5

Coefficient of differentiation (F st ) among populations of Leptopelis gramineus and Amietia sp. based on all nuclear loci

Amietia sp.

East

North

  

 North

0.4385

   

 West

0.6436

0.7405

  

Leptopelis gramineus

Arsi

Kasha

Kibre Mengist

All Eastern Populations

 Kasha

0.2281

   

 Kibre Mengist

0.0825

0.1227

  

 West

0.5827

0.5321

0.5678

0.5037

The BEAST estimates of divergence time between the east and west mitochondrial lineages are similar among species and suggests a split ~0.8 to 1.0 my ago, in the mid-Pleistocene (Table 6). The *BEAST analyses, which take into account the coalescent of the mitochondrial and nuclear loci, produced similar estimates among species and support divergences in the Pleistocene, 0.39 to 0.50 my ago (Table 6). The BEAST estimates tend to be older than the *BEAST estimates but this is expected since divergence between alleles pre-dates population divergence. Finally, the East-west split estimated with G-PHoCS (Table 7), using only the nuclear genes and a different mutation rate than *BEAST, yielded close estimates from 0.34 to 0.53 my. The estimates of divergence of the northern populations of Amietia sp. were different across methods, with a BEAST estimate at 3.28 my, a *BEAST estimate at 1.74 my and a G-PHoCS estimate at 0.65 my. This is likely caused by the discordance between the large mitochondrial divergence and the low level of differentiation observed at nuclear loci.
Table 6

Time of divergence

  

BEAST

*BEAST

Amietia sp.

TMRCA - East

0.12 (0.03–0.26)

_

TMRCA - West

0.39 (0.19–0.64)

_

TMRCA - North

1.45 (0.59–2.23)

_

Divergence (East, West)

0.88 (0.48–1.45)

0.42 (0.09–3.10)

Divergence North (East, West)

3.28 (1.75–4.98)

1.74 (0.58–5.12)

Ptychadena cooperi

TMRCA - West

0.29 (0.09–0.62)

_

Divergence (East, West)

0.82 (0.28–1.54)

0.50 (0.14–1.06)

Divergence Bale (East, West)

2.84 (0.85–4.60)

_

Ptychadena cf. neumanni 2

TMRCA - East

0.61 (0.11–2.02)

_

TMRCA - West

0.63 (0.12–1.98)

_

Divergence (East, West)

1.05 (0.54–1.80)

0.39 (0.05–1.92)

Leptopelis gramineus

TMRCA - Arsi

0.67 (0.36–1.08)

_

TMRCA - West

1.34 (0.76–2.10)

_

TMRCA - Kibre Mengist

0.99 (0.47–1.71)

_

TMRCA - Bale

0.37 (0.10–0.79)

_

Divergence - node 1

5.47 (3.66–7.83)

2.00 (1.02–3.34)

Divergence - node 2

4.26 (3.06–5.85)

1.21 (0.70–1.94)

Divergence - node 3

3.62 (2.38–5.06)

0.95 (0.52–1.56)

Ptychadena erlangeri

TMRCA

5.13 (3.96–6.38)

_

TMRCA main clade

0.51 (0.24–0.78)

_

Ptychadena cf. neumanni 1

TMRCA

0.74 (0.29–1.20)

_

Tomopterna kachowskii

TMRCA

0.86 (0.45–0.14)

_

Ages are in million years and the numbers in parentheses correspond to the 95 % highest posterior density. Node numbers as on Fig. 5

Table 7

Coalescent based estimates for population parameters. The estimates of divergence time (τ in years), population size (θ in individuals) and migration rate (m) are shown

 

Parameters

Mean (95 % CI lower - 95 % CI upper)

Amietia sp.

 

θ west

38,710 (12,186–70,967)

θ east

77,957 (26,881–138,172)

θ north

53,405 (11,469–104,659)

θ west-east

55,197 (5734–115,949)

θ root

51,612 (2508–111,469)

τ west-east

417,491 (147,096–708,243)

τ root

652,043 (272,401–1,089,605)

m west = > east

0.0022 (0.0000–0.0114)

m east = > west

0.0010 (0.0000–0.0058)

m west = > north

0.0006 (0.0000–0.0032)

m north = > west

0.0008 (0.0000–0.0051)

Ptychadena cooperi

 

θ west

38,631 (15,890–69,870)

θ east

65,707 (24,059–115,415)

θ west-east

63,346 (20,199–111,511)

τ west-east

528,861 (277,923–906,446)

m east = > west

0.0001 (0–0.0008)

m west = > east

0.0001 (0–0.0008)

Ptychadena cf. neumanni 2

 

θ west

27,212 (10,519–46,106)

θ east

149,4546 (83,936–223,559)

θ west-east

198,253 (82,233–275,627)

τ west-east

339,231 (134,523–579,477)

m east = > west

0.0001 (0–0.0009)

m west = > east

0.0001 (0–0.0016)

Leptopelis gramineus

 

θ Arsi

1,017,025 (476,882–1,617,025)

θ Kibre Mengist

576,165 (282,975–913,262)

θ Kasha

831,720 (271,685–1,482,079)

θ West

517,383 (265,771–808,781)

θ Arsi-Kibre Mengist

797,670 (89,964–1,652,151)

θ Arsi-Kibre Mengist-Kasha

1,022,939 (232,079–1,899,283)

θ root

554,839 (252,151–901,971)

τ Arsi-Kibre Mengist

666,953 (180,645–1,129,749)

τ (Arsi-Kibre Mengist)-Kasha

1,050,896 (539,068–1,628,673)

τ root

2,097,204 (1,353,405–2,864,516)

m west = > east

0.0001 (0.0000–0.0007)

m east = > west

0.0001 (0.0000–0.0007)

The estimates of effective population size differ among species (Table 7), which is consistent with the substantial differences in genetic diversity at all loci (Table 3). The estimates of population size for P. cooperi and Amietia sp. are similar but in both species the population sizes on the east (~66,000 and 78,000 for P. cooperi and Amietia sp.) are substantially higher than on the west (~38,000). The same pattern is observed in P. cf. neumanni 2 but the difference is much larger since the estimate of population size in the east is five times larger than the western one (149,455 vs 27,212). Migration rates estimated by G-PhoCS are extremely low in all three species with 95 % credible intervals containing 0 for both east-to-west and west-to-east estimates suggesting that the eastern and western populations have not exchanged migrants at a detectable level since their split (Table 7). The EBSP analysis (Fig. 4) performed on the western population of P. cf. neumanni 2 suggests that this population experienced a rapid 10-fold increase in population size in the last 20,000 years. The EBSPs performed on the western population of P. cf. neumanni 2, Amietia sp. and P. cooperi are all indicative of a stable demography (not shown). However, the low amount of genetic variation in these populations is probably insufficient to accurately reconstruct the demographic history of these species and will require the acquisition of data from a large number of fast-evolving nuclear loci.
Fig. 4

Demographic trajectories estimated by Extended Bayesian Skyline Plot (EBSP). The median population size is shown with a black line and the 95 % credible intervals are shown with grey lines

A fossorial frog from the grasslands and the forests: Leptopelis gramineus

Thirty-four specimens of Leptopelis gramineus were collected from 17 localities, 5 on the western side of the GRV and 12 on the eastern side (Fig. 5). The sampling sites on the east include 6 grassland localities ranging from 2400 to 3000 m asl and 6 localities in the tropical humid forest flanking the southern side of the eastern highlands, at elevations ~2100 to ~2400 m. Five of the western localities were in highland grasslands between ~2600 and ~2800 m asl whereas a single locality 30 km south west of Jimma was in a humid tropical forest at an elevation of ~2100 m. ENMs for L. gramineus showed good prediction ability (Table 1) and indicated that current favorable climatic conditions are limited to the highlands and to the humid forests of the south (Fig. 1). ENMs indicate that while the GRV is currently not favorable for the species, it might have been suitable during the LGM (Fig. 1).
Fig. 5

a Mitochondrial phylogeny of L. gramineus constructed using BEAST. The numbers at the nodes correspond to posterior probability values. The boxed number corresponds to the age of the nodes. b Map showing the origin of the samples. c Population phylogeny reconstructed using *BEAST. The boxed numbers correspond to the nodes age calibrated using the two mutation rates

All phylogenetic reconstructions based on the COI gene produced identical topologies indicative of four well-supported and highly divergent mitochondrial lineages (Fig. 2 and 5), with defined geographic distributions. The average distance between these clades is high, ranging from 6.4 to 8.0 %. One of the clades includes all haplotypes from the west side of the GRV whereas three clades are found in the east: a clade found on the Arsi plateau and at high elevations in the Bale massif (referred as the Arsi clade on Table 4), a clade found exclusively near Kasha in the Harenna forest (Kasha clade) and a clade found in the forest of the southernmost portion of the eastern massif, near the town of Kibre Mengist (Kibre Mengist clade). Interestingly the western clade is nested within the three eastern clades, which do not form a monophyletic group. Consistent with a clear east-west break and with the presence of divergent mitochondrial lineages in the east, the AMOVA reveals that 52 % of the mitochondrial variation is explained by differences between the east and the west of the GRV and 34 % by differences among populations within groups (Table 2).

The level of nuclear variation in L. gramineus is comparatively higher than in other species with a total of 94 SNPs. Although the number of SNPs is large, a single one (in the Rag-1 gene) separates the populations west and east of the GRV. The Structure analysis supports the presence of two populations, separated by the GRV, by the delta-K criterion but six populations by the Pr(K|X) criterion. The Pr(K|X) criterion also separates the individuals of the western side of the GRV but does not reveal any biologically meaningful structure in the samples from the east. Consistent with the Structure analysis, Structurama recovers the same east-west split (Table 4). Interestingly, the clustering approaches did not recover any genetic structure in the east, although the mitochondrial analysis suggested the presence of three distinct populations. The AMOVA performed on the 5 nuclear genes confirmed the validity of the east-west break and the lack of strong structure within each group, as only 12.55 % of the variation is explained by variation among populations (Table 2). F st (Table 5) calculated between the western population and each of the eastern populations yielded high and significant values (from 0.53 to 0.58) whereas F st among eastern populations defined by their mitochondrial lineage yielded much lower, yet significant, values (from 0.08 to 0.23). Taken together, the analyses of the mitochondrial and nuclear datasets strongly indicate a clear genetic break between the eastern and western populations of L. gramineus as well as additional genetic structure between the eastern populations from the plateau and the populations from the tropical forests.

BEAST estimated that the four mitochondrial lineages diverged in the Pliocene, between 5.5 and 3.6 my (Fig. 5 and Table 6). The species tree approach yielded a different topology than the mitochondrial gene trees, the western population being the most divergent one and the three eastern populations forming a monophyletic group, as well as more recent divergence time (Fig. 5). *BEAST estimates the split between the western and the eastern populations in the early Pleistocene (2.0 my; Table 6). The divergence between the three eastern populations is dated at ~1.2 to 0.9 my. The G-PHoCS estimates of divergence are similar to the one obtained with *BEAST with an east-west divergence dated ~2.1 my in the early Pleistocene (Table 6).

The G-PHoCS estimates of effective population size are consistent across priors and relatively similar among populations, ranging from ~500,000 to ~1,000,000 individuals (Table 7). However, an EBSP analysis of the Arsi population suggests a 10-fold demographic expansion starting ~ 400,000 year ago (note that the sample size for the other populations was too low for EBSP analysis). A population expansion for Arsi is also supported by Tajima’s D and Fu’s F, which yielded negative values for all loci (mitochondrial and nuclear), although few values were significant. The migration rates estimated by G-PHoCS between the east and west populations are not significantly different from 0, indicating that the Western and Eastern populations have apparently not exchanged migrants at a detectable level for a very long time (Table 7).

Lower elevation species: Ptychadena erlangeri, P. cf. neumanni 1 and Tomopterna kachowskii

Ptychadena erlangeri was collected in forest clearings, in the southwest and in two localities east of the GRV. The distribution of P. cf. neumanni 1 is limited to the west of the GRV where it occupies grassland habitats under 2500 m but its distribution extends to the forests of the southwest where it coexists with P. erlangeri. Tomopterna kachowskii were collected across a large range of elevations (from ~1300 to ~2600 m above sea level) and habitats (from dry lowland savanna to mid-elevation grasslands) on both side of the GRV.

ENMs for these species indicated distinct distribution ranges for the present time and different range dynamics since the LGM (Fig. 1). Evaluation metrics for these models showed good prediction ability for P. erlangeri and P. cf. neumanni 1 but moderate for T. kachowskii (Table 1). The predicted distribution for P. erlangeri includes the forests of Kaffa as well as the forests that are flanking the southern side of the eastern highlands. Interestingly the model predicts the presence of a corridor of favorable habitat crossing the GRV, south of Awassa and north of Lake Abaya, suggesting a possible connection between populations east and west of the Rift (Fig. 1). According to the projection of ENMs, this species could have had a similar but somewhat more widespread distribution during the LGM than in the present time. ENMs for P. cf. neumanni 1 suggest that favorable habitat for this species currently exists almost exclusively on the west side of the GRV and includes the entire western massif, excluding the highest elevation mountains. It also extends south, reaching the northern portion of the tropical forest of Kaffa. For the LGM, ENMs indicate that there could have been suitable areas for P. cf. neumanni 1 on the Eastern Highlands and that the Western and Eastern highlands could have been connected by suitable habitats. Consistent with our observations and what is known of the ecology of this species, ENMs predict that the distribution of T. kachowskii is continuous in the lowlands and extends on the flanks of the highlands, but does not include the highest elevation areas. A similar distribution pattern is predicted for the LGM.

Phylogenetic analyses of the COI gene in P. erlangeri and T. kachowskii revealed that haplotypes do not group on the phylogenies according to geography. Instead, eastern and western samples are interspersed over the phylogenies (Fig. 2). This is confirmed by the AMOVA analyses based on mitochondrial sequences which indicated that most of the variation is found within populations and that among group variation does not contribute to the overall genetic variance between populations east and west of the GRV (Table 2). In P. erlangeri, two deeply divergent lineages were recovered in 3 individuals from the forests of the southwest. These two lineages differ on average from the main clade by 10.8 and 3.3 %, respectively (Fig. 2). This amount of divergence is unusual within species, yet the persistence of ancestral mitochondrial lineages in frog populations has been observed in other taxa [2325]. It should be noted that the frogs carrying these divergent lineages come from localities where the main clade was recovered and that they are undistinguishable from other P. erlangeri with respect to morphology or nuclear variation.

In P. erlangeri and T. kachowskii, all the nuclear genes revealed the same patterns, i.e. extensive allele sharing between populations on the east and the west side of the GRV, and the level of differentiation between east and west estimated by Fst were low and non-significant at all loci (Table 3). The Structure analysis determined that the most likely number of populations in these two species was 1 based on the Pr(K|X) criterion and as 2 by the delta-K criterion, which is not designed to chose the best value of K when K < 2 (Table 4). Similarly, the Structurama analysis provides strong support in favor of a single population (Table 4). Finally the AMOVA analyses based on the nuclear datasets indicate that the vast majority of the variation is found within population (~92 and 99 % in P. erlangeri and T. kachowskii, respectively) (Table 2). Clearly, all the methods used to detect genetic structure in P. erlangeri and T. kachowskii, using either the mitochondrial or the nuclear datasets, demonstrate that these species consist of a single gene pool and that the GRV has no impact on their genetic structure.

In P. cf. neumanni 1, the only species limited to the western side of the GRV, we also failed to find any population structure. The mitochondrial phylogeny did not reveal any geographic grouping (not shown) and the Structurama and Structure analyses strongly supported the presence of a single gene pool (Table 4). In addition, F st calculated between all pairs of population were consistently lower than 0.1 confirming the lack of genetic structure in this species (data not shown).

The estimates of population size calculated with BPP are highly consistent across priors and are similar among taxa, from ~400,000 in P. cf. neumanni 1 and T. kachowskii to ~600,000 in P. erlangeri. The demographic trajectory constructed with EBSP looks similar among the three low elevation species and suggests a progressive 10-fold population expansion beginning ~400,000 years ago, identical to the expansion observed in L. gramineus (Fig. 4). A past population expansion is also supported by the fact that almost all values of Tajima’s D and Fu’s F are negative for the mitochondrial and nuclear genes (Table 3).

Discussion

We reconstructed the evolutionary history of seven frog species with different elevational and ecological preferences and we examined the impact the GRV has had on their population structure. Our results can be summarized as follow: (1) In species that are found at high elevations (P. cf. neumanni 2, P. cooperi, Amietia sp. and L. gramineus), populations east and west of the GRV are genetically distinct; (2) In species that are found at elevations under 2500 m (P. erlangeri and T. kachowskii) there is no genetic differentiation between populations on each side of the GRV; (3) Genetic variation differs considerably among Ethiopian frog species suggesting differences in effective population size and demographic history; (4) Several species (L. gramineus, P. erlangeri, P. cf. neumanni 1, T. kachowskii) exhibit the signature of a gradual demographic expansion starting ~400,000 years ago.

Before further discussing our results, a word of caution is necessary. The number of genes analyzed here is relatively small and the amount of variation at nuclear protein coding genes is low, particularly in Amietia sp. and P. cooperi. In addition, there is some uncertainty about mutation rates in frogs, particularly for nuclear genes. Thus, estimates of divergence time or effective population size need to be interpreted with caution. With these caveats in mind, it remains that our most significant results do not rely on mutation rates. The mitochondrial phylogeny, the Structure and Structurama analyses and the AMOVA all support a role of the GRV in the splitting of the four highland species into two gene pools. Similarly, the mitochondrial and nuclear datasets are congruent in showing a lack of structure in species distributed at elevations lower than 2500 m. It is unlikely that more data would contradict these conclusions, although additional analyses could yield more accurate estimates of the timing of population subdivision and the effective population size of our focal species. In addition, it should be acceptable to compare variation and relative divergence among species since the nature of the datasets used here are comparable across species, comprising 1 protein-coding mitochondrial gene and a combination of 3 to 5 nuclear genes.

Our analysis emphasizes the role of the GRV as a biogeographic barrier for highland adapted species. We demonstrated that the GRV has prevented gene flow between eastern and western populations for the last ~0.4 my in Amietia sp., P. cf. neumanni 2 and P. cooperi and for the last 2.0 my in L. gramineus. The absence of recent gene flow can easily be explained by the current climatic conditions in the floor of the GRV that are not favorable to any of the highland species (Fig. 2). However, the population divergences we dated in the early to mid-Pleistocene suggest that the climatic oscillations of the last 0.5 my did not result in any detectable gene flow between the east and the west of the GRV. Ecological niche models for the LGM indicate that climatic conditions in the GRV were not favorable for some species (P. cf. neumanni 2) but that they could have been for others (Amietia sp., P. cooperi, L. gramineus), yet did not result in substantial migration (Fig. 1). Thus, climate alone does not fully explain the persistence of genetic differentiation in highland species. Another factor that could have played a role is the topography of the GRV, in particular the steep slopes in its upper portions. The margins of the Ethiopian GRV are comparable to an 800 m wall (from 1500 m asl in the floor of the GRV to 2300 m asl on the plateau) and are likely to constitute insurmountable barriers to dispersal for frogs. Recent studies showed that mountain ridges and deep slopes can act as a dispersal barrier for amphibians [2628], because of physiological limitations [28] or because of the high energy cost of climbing steep slopes [26]. Indeed, an effect of topography has been demonstrated in a number of frog species, including Rana luteiventris [26, 29], Epipedobates femoralis [28], and Atelopus varius [30]. It is highly likely that a combination of climatic and topographical factors is responsible for the pattern of divergence we report for Ethiopian taxa, although it is not possible to decipher between these two factors with our data.

It remains, however, that P. cooperi, Amietia sp., L. gramineus and P. cf. neumanni 2 are present on both side of the GRV and that at some point the GRV could be crossed by these species. One possibility is that in the past the floor of the GRV was higher relative to the plateaus. It is well known that elevation of the GRV has changed through time [31] and it is plausible that the gradual down-faulting of the GRV’s floor resulted in the formation of a vicariant barrier, splitting the distribution of these species in two. An alternative possibility is that the conditions in Ethiopia were sufficiently cool and humid until ~0.4 my ago and that the distribution of the species were then continuous. It is only with the increased aridification of Eastern Africa, particularly in the last half million year, that the GRV became a true barrier to dispersal [6].

It appears that the split between populations east and west of the GRV is not concomitant in all species. The divergence time between east and west are similar between Amietia sp., P. cf. neumanni 2 and P. cooperi at ~0.4 my but the east-west split is substantially older in L. gramineus (at ~2.1 my) as in Xenopus clivii and X. largeni (at ~1.0 to 3.5 my) [16]. These differences could be due to different dispersal abilities or to different tolerance to dry conditions. Amietia sp., P. cooperi, and P. cf. neumanni 2 are relatively agile frogs which could easily colonize new favorable habitats whereas L. gramineus is a slow moving species which requires the persistence of moisture in soils to accommodate its fossorial ecology. Frogs of the genus Xenopus are exclusively aquatic and it is unlikely they are capable of long distance migrations, although they are capable of short distance dispersal on land. These differences in dispersal abilities are particularly relevant in the context of the GRV since the topography of the margin of the rift could constitute a considerably more difficult barrier to dispersal for fossorial and aquatic species.

Our study of Amietia sp. indicates that the Blue Nile Valley is acting as a biogeographic barrier. The ENMs clearly show that the climatic conditions in the valley are currently not favorable to this species but they also reveal that this was true during the Last Glacial Maximum. The combination of extremely steep slopes (the canyon is 1400 m deep) with the persistent dry conditions on the valley floor is likely to prevent dispersal of highland frogs. Such a role of the Blue Nile valley had previously been detected in Xenopus clivii and is supported by the presence of endemic species restricted north of the Blue Nile (e.g. P. cf. neumanni 5, Leptopelis yaldeni) and by the absence of several species that are found immediately south of the valley (P. cooperi, P. cf. neumanni 1, L. gramineus).

The amount of genetic variation differs considerably among species, reflecting differences in effective population size (Ne) and demographic history. The Ne of the species found at low elevation (T. kachowskii, P. cf. neumanni 1 and P. erlangeri) are relatively similar (~400,000 to 700,000 individuals) and substantially higher than the Ne of the highland species (Amietia sp., P. cooperi and P. cf. neumanni 2) which are 4 to 10 times lower (~40,000 to ~120,000). This difference is not due to a recent bottleneck in highland species since none of the values of Tajima’s D and Fu’s F are significantly positive and the EBSP either showed a recent demographic expansion (P. cf. neumanni 2; Fig. 4) or demographic stability (Amietia sp., P. cooperi; analysis not shown). Instead, these differences are best explained by the large and gradual demographic expansion of lowland species starting ~400,000 year ago. This demographic trajectory is consistent with the progressive warming of East-Africa in the Pleistocene [6], which could have resulted in the expansion of habitats favorable to lowland species (for example savanna for T. kachowskii) as well as causing the fragmentation of tropical forests, thus generating novel habitats to species living in clearings or in forest margins (P. cf. neumanni 1 and P. erlangeri). However, it is difficult to evaluate the validity of this scenario given the number of uncertainties about the geological and climatic history of this region.

Leptopelis gramineus is the exception to the trend described above, its highland population (Arsi) being large (~1,000,000) and having experienced a 10-fold demographic expansion, comparable to the one observed in lowland species. The genus Leptopelis is a typical inhabitant of African tropical forests and the high elevation grasslands are not typical habitats. Thus it is likely that the tropical rain forests constitute the ancestral habitat of L. gramineus (as suggested by preliminary phylogenetic analyses of the genus; [32] and Reyes-Velasco et al., unpublished data) and that a niche shift occurred concomitantly or posteriorly to the split between the Arsi population and the forests populations (Kasha, Kibre Mengist), dated at ~1 my. We propose that the ecological shift from a forest to a highland habitat could have resulted in the colonization of an empty ecological niche on the plateaus and in a large demographic expansion. This hypothesis is highly speculative at this point and will require validation by additional research.

Conclusions

We found substantial genetic differentiation in highland species, demonstrating a role of the GRV as a biogeographic barrier, but an absence of structure in species found below 2500 m. The absence of gene flow between highland populations for the last 0.4 my, together with the demographic expansion of low elevation species starting around the same time, suggests a major change in the environmental conditions in Ethiopia in the last half million year and is consistent with the progressive aridification of Eastern Africa during the Pleistocene.

Methods

Sample collection

Samples were collected in 101 different localities on both sides of the GRV (Fig. 1). Collecting took place during the rainy season in July and August 2011 and from June to August 2013. Specimens of Tomopterna kachowskii (N = 40), Amietia sp. (N = 35), Leptopelis gramineus (N = 34), Ptychadena cooperi (N = 31), P. erlangeri (N = 36), P. cf. neumanni 1 (N = 49) and P. cf.neumanni 2 (N = 60) were collected from 16, 13, 17, 14, 12, 15 and 14 localities, respectively. For all species, except P. cf. neumanni 1, samples were collected on both sides of the GRV. Collection and export permits were obtained from the Ethiopian Wildlife Conservation Agency. The origin of each sample is listed in Additional file 1: Table S1. Dissections were performed immediately after the frogs were euthanized by ventral application of benzocaine [33]. Liver or muscle samples were preserved in 90 % ethanol. All specimens were deposited at the Natural History Museum of Addis Ababa University.

Molecular analyses

Genomic DNA was isolated from the ethanol-preserved tissues using the Wizard SV® genomic DNA purification system (Promega). Two mitochondrial genes were amplified and sequenced: the cytochrome oxidase 1 gene (COI) (a 505 bp fragment in T. kachowskii and L. gramineus, and a 447 bp fragment in all Ptychadena) and 962 bp of the NADH dehydrogenase subunit II (ND2) in Amietia sp. Depending on the species, 3 to 5 nuclear genes were amplified and sequenced. In T. kachowskii, a region of 614 bp in the recombinase activating gene 1 (Rag-1), a region of 791 bp in the second exon of the sodium/calcium exchanger gene 1 (NCX1), a 452 bp fragment in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene (BDNF) and 785 bp of the solute carrier family 8 member 3 gene (SLC8A3). In Amietia sp., we sequenced 791 bp of Rag-1, 563 bp of BDNF and a 540 bp region in the first exon of the tyrosinase gene (Tyr). In L. gramineus we sequenced 699 bp of Rag-1, 554 bp of NCX1, 400 bp of BDNF, 442 bp of Tyr and a 566 bp region in the recombinase activating gene 2 (Rag-2). For Ptychadena, the same four nuclear genes analyzed in [17] were used, namely 523 bp of Rag-1, 668 bp of NCX1, 331 bp of Tyr and 447 bp in the second exon of the chemokine receptor type 4 gene (CXCR4).

PCR conditions consisted of an initial denaturation step at 94C for 2 min, followed by 30 cycles for 30s at 94C, 30s at 48–60C depending on the primer pairs, 1 min at 72C, then a final extension at 72C for 1 min. The sequences of the primers and the annealing temperatures are presented in Additional file 2: Table S2. PCR products were purified and sequenced in both directions by the High Throughput Genomics Unit at the University of Washington in Seattle. Chromatograms were imported into Geneious Pro version 6.4 created by Biomatters available at http://www.geneious.com. Putative heterozygotes were assessed based on quality score and verified by visual inspection of the chromatograms. The reverse and forward reads were assembled into contigs and alignments were generated for each locus. The gametic phase of each nuclear haplotype was resolved using PHASE 2.1 implemented in DnaSP version 5.

Phylogenetic analyses

Mitochondrial genes were analyzed phylogenetically using maximum-likelihood and Bayesian methods. The substitution model that best fits the data was determined using the Bayesian Information Criterion in MEGA 5.0 [34]. Maximum likelihood phylogenies were reconstructed using the MEGA 5.0 and the robustness of the nodes was assessed using 1000 bootstrap replicates. Bayesian phylogenies were reconstructed using MrBayes 3.2 [35]. Analyses were run for 20,000,000 generations and we sampled 10,000 trees, discarding the first 1000 as burn-in. The time to most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) for each mitochondrial lineages and the divergence between mitochondrial lineages were estimated using the program BEAST v1.8 [36]. Analyses were performed using the HKY + Gamma model of substitution. We used a coalescent tree prior, an uncorrelated relaxed clock and we assumed a constant population size. Analyses were ran for 100,000,000 generations from which 100,000 trees were sampled following a 10 % burn-in. Results were checked for convergence using Tracer v1.6 [37]. Since COI and ND2 evolve at relatively similar rates in anurans [17], we estimated divergence time using the ND2 rate of 0.957 % per lineage per million years [38].

Population structure

The population structure within each species was inferred using several approaches. First, we used the Bayesian clustering program Structure v2.3.3. [39] on the nuclear data. Structure estimates the likelihood of a user-set number of clusters (K) and assigns individuals to each cluster. We ran the model with or without admixture for 200,000 generations, with 10,000 discarded as burn-in. Five runs were performed for each value of K ranging from 1 to 6. We assessed the level of support for each value of K using the ad hoc approach proposed by Pritchard et al. [39] as well as the delta-K criterion of Evanno et al. [40], calculated with Structure Harvester [41]. We also used a second Bayesian clustering approach, implemented in Structurama version 2.0 [42]. Structurama treats the number of population as a random variable using a Dirichlet prior and assigns individuals to each inferred populations. We performed the analysis using five priors with a mean number of clusters 1 to 6. We also treated the concentration parameter as an hyper-parameter and used a gamma hyper-prior G(2.5, 0.5). The Markov Chain Monte Carlo was run for 1,000,000 cycles, sampled every 100th cycle and discarded the first 5000 as burn-in. We used the “no admixture” model on all analyses. Relying solely on Bayesian clustering analyses to infer the number of populations in a sample has been questioned [4345]. Thus, we also assessed the level of differentiation between each sampled populations by calculating F st for each gene and for the entire nuclear dataset. Individuals sampled 20 km from each others were pooled and considered part of the same population. These calculations were performed using Arlequin v3.5 [46]. To assess the effect of the Rift Valley on population structure we performed an analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) [47] on the mitochondrial datasets and on a concatenated nuclear dataset using Arlequin [46]. Populations were divided into two groups, the populations west of the Rift and the populations east of the Rift. The AMOVA partitions hierarchically genetic variation among populations relative to the total sample, among populations within regions, and among regions. Significance of the results was assessed by 10,000 permutations of the data matrix. For each population (defined by Bayesian clustering or by geography), we calculated a number of descriptive statistics including the number of segregating site (S), the number of haplotypes (h), the nucleotide diversity (π), and the Waterson’s estimator of nucleotide diversity (θ). Neutrality or demographic changes was assessed using Tajima’s D [48] and Fu’s F [49]. These calculations were performed using the program DnaSP version 5 [50].

Timing of divergence and demographic history

We estimated the divergence time between populations using the species tree approach implemented in *BEAST [51]. *BEAST implements a probabilistic framework using sequences from several unlinked loci and several individuals per populations to infer a species/population tree and to estimate the divergence time of the populations. *BEAST analyses were performed using the mitochondrial genes and 3 to 5 nuclear genes, depending on the species. The substitution models used were HKY + Gamma for the mitochondrial genes and HKY for the nuclear genes. For divergence time estimation we used the mitochondrial mutation rate of 0.957 %. We placed normally distributed prior probabilities around the mutation parameters for each nuclear gene with a starting mean of 1. The divergence times were estimated under the uncorrelated relaxed-clock tree model with a Yule prior. Analyses were run twice for 400,000,000 generations, sampling every 10,000 generations for a total of 40,000 trees. Convergence between the runs was monitored using the effective sample size (ESS) values obtained using Tracer v1.6. The initial 10 % of the runs were discarded as burn-in and maximum-clade credibility trees with divergence time estimates were obtained using TreeAnnotator in BEAST v1.8 [36].

Divergence times were estimated using a second method, implemented in G-PHoCS [52]. Using a coalescent framework, G-PHoCS estimates key population genetics parameters including population sizes (θ), population divergence times (τ) and migration rates (m) from unlinked nuclear loci. G-PHoCS integrates all possible phases of diploid genotypic data, thus removing a potential source of error in phylogeographic analyses. We evaluated the effect of different priors of the gamma distribution G(α,β) for the θ and τ parameters, which were ~ G(2,10), ~G(2,1000) and ~ G(2,2000). For each set of priors we ran five replicates with different seeds for 500,000 generations, with a sampling interval of 50 generations and we assessed convergence of separate runs using Tracer v1.6. Demographic parameters estimated by G-PHoCS are given as relative values as they are scaled by the mutation rate, which requires a conversion to obtain values in time or number of individuals [52, 53]. As we do not have reliable outgroups with accurate divergence time for any of the taxa analyzed here, we used an average of the mutation rates calculated in [17] for 4 nuclear genes of 0.065 % per my, which is consistent with the 16-fold difference between the mitochondrial and nuclear mutation rate in anurans estimated by Crawford [38]. Unfortunately there is no information available on the reproduction of these species, particularly in terms of generation time. Considering that the activity (and consequently the growth) of these species is probably limited during the dry season, it is plausible to assume an age at maturity of 2 years. As G-PHoCS is designed to analyze multiple populations, we estimated the effective population size of T. kachowskii, P. erlangeri and P. cf. neumanni 1 (that do not show any population structure; see results) using the BPP software [54], which uses the same coalescent framework as G-PHoCS.

The demographic trajectory of each population was further analyzed using the extended Bayesian skyline plots (EBSP) on the multi-locus data [55]. The EBSP uses the coalescent history of multiple genomic loci to estimate the number and extent of population size changes in the past. For the EBSP, all loci were assigned different substitution models, clock models and trees. The clock rates for the nuclear genes were assigned a uniform [0,1] prior distribution and the rates were estimated relative to the mitochondrial sequences.

Ecological niche modeling

Habitat suitability maps for the present time and for the LGM (21ky) were obtained by means of ecological niche models (ENMs; [22]) where we used the presence data obtained from our own observations. The presence data include all the individuals analyzed here, as well as additional collecting points not included in the present study. ENMs were built by means of MaxEnt [56] using default parameters and settings, and with Worldclim bioclimatic variables [57] as environmental predictors. We used an uncorrelated (r < 0.7) dataset of six bioclimatic variables out of the 19 variables available from WorldClim. The reduction in the number of variables was done in order to reduce variable collinearity and model overfitting, which have been indicated to negatively affect model predictions, particularly when projecting across space or time [58, 59]. These variables were mean diurnal range (Bio2), isothermality (Bio3), mean temperature of warmest quarter (Bio10), precipitation of wettest month (Bio13), precipitation of warmest quarter (Bio18), and precipitation of coldest quarter (Bio19). As extent for training the model we used our sampling area, as defined by the maximum convex polygons of all species’ locations, plus a buffer area of 1°. The final model for the present time is the average prediction of 50 model replicates. On each replicate, the occurrence data is split in a training set (80 %) and a test set (20 %). The number of occurrences per species ranged from 13 to 24 (Table 1). ENMs parameterized for the present time were projected into LGM conditions (21ky ago) obtained from the WorldClim database. LGM was represented by three different climatic models: the Community Climate System Model (CCSM4), the Model for Interdisciplinary Research on Climate – Earth System Model (MIROC-ESM) and the Max Plank Institute – Earth System Model (MPI-ESM). Using three different climate models allows us to account for uncertainty associated to LGM climate data. Continuous models for both the present and the LGM times were turned into binary distribution ranges using the threshold value that maximizes the sum of the sensitivity and specificity of the model in the test data sets [60]. In order to address the issue of non-analogous climates [61], we used the clamped projections maps provided by MaxEnt, where environmental layers and projections are truncated to maximum and minimum environmental and projected values in the training data set. Additionally, MaxEnt also yield clamping maps that inform for each simulation and for each cell the absolute difference between prediction values with and without clamping. In our final projected maps we only project the model to those areas where this difference is < 0.1, thus ensuring that uncertainty due to non-analogous climates is low.

Abbreviations

asl: 

Above sea level

ENM: 

Ecological niche model

GRV: 

Great Rift Valley

LGM: 

Last Glacial Maximum

my: 

Million year

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Laboratory work was conducted in part with equipment from the Core Facilities for Imaging, Cellular and Molecular Biology at Queens College. We would like to thank the Department of Biology and the Division of Mathematics and Natural Sciences at Queens College for supporting this research and the Ethiopian Wildlife Conservation Authority for granting us research and export permits. We thank Salomon Sebsebie, Tilahoun Mulatu, Rita Monfort, Sela Sherr, Ioannis Demopoulos and Ivana Roman for their help in the field. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

The research group “Evolutionary Genetics – Class of 2013” was composed of: Dina Calderon; Anastasia Kanellopoulos; Ewelina Knap; Paul Marinos; Maryam Mudasir; Stephen Pirpinas; Ryan Rengifo; Jayson Slovak; Alyssa Stauber; Edwin Tirado; Ivonne Uquilas; Michelle Velasquez; Elizabeth Vera; Anna Wilga.

Funding

This research was supported by the Department of Biology at Queens College in the context of the Evolutionary Genetics - class of 2013. XF’s field work was supported by a Doctoral Student Research Grant from the Graduate Center of the City University of New York.

Availability of data and material

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are available in GenBank under accession numbers KX225496-KX226321 (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Authors’ contributions

XF and SB conceived the project. XF, RC and SB collected the specimens in Ethiopia. XF, JB, OC, RC and the “Evolutionary Genetics - class of 2013” collected and analyzed the molecular data. JA performed the ENM analysis. XF, JA and SB made the illustrations and drafted the manuscript. All authors corrected and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval

This research was performed following the recommendations of the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) for the euthanasia of ectotherms and every step was taken to avoid stress and suffering. The protocol was approved by the Queens College Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) (Animal Welfare Assurance Number: A32721-01) and was administered by the authors. Euthanasia was performed less than 2 h after capture to minimize stress. Benzocaine hydrochloride gel at a 20 % concentration was applied topically on the ventrum of the frogs. This method is very effective, including in relatively large frogs, and is recommended by the AVMA guidelines. Following application of benzocaine hydrochloride, a physical method was used (pithing) to insure death.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biology, Queens College, City University of New York
(2)
Ecology, Evolution and Behavior Program, Graduate Center, City University of New York
(3)
New York University Abu Dhabi

References

  1. Mittermeier RA, Robles Gil R, Hoffman M, Pilgrim J, Brooks T, Goettsch Mittermeier C, Lamoreux J, da Fonseca GAB. Hotspots revisited: Earth's biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial ecoregions. Mexico: Cemex; 2004.Google Scholar
  2. Largen MJ. Catalogue of the amphibians of Ethiopia, including a key for their identification. Trop Zool. 2001;14:307–402.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Largen MJ, Spawls S. The amphibians and reptiles of Ethiopia and Eritrea. Frankfurt am Main: Edition Chimaira; 2010.Google Scholar
  4. Chorowicz J. The East African rift system. J Afr Earth Sci. 2005;43:379–410.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Sepulchre P, Ramstein G, Fluteau F, Schuster M, Tiercelin JJ, Brunet M. Tectonic uplift and Eastern Africa aridification. Science. 2006;313(5792):1419–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. deMenocal PB. African climate change and faunal evolution during the Pliocene-Pleistocene. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 2004;220:3–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Trauth MH, Larrasoana JC, Mudelsee M. Trends, rhythms ands events in Plio-Pleistocene African climate. Quaternary Sci Rev. 2009;28:399–411.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Trauth MH, Maslin MA, Deino A, Strecker MR. Late Cenozoic moisture history of East Africa. Science. 2005;309(5743):2051–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cerling TE, Wynn JG, Andanje SA, Bird MI, Korir DK, Levin NE, Mace W, Macharia AN, Quade J, Remien CH. Woody cover and hominin environments in the past 6 million years. Nature. 2011;476(7358):51–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gasse F. Hydrological changes in the African tropics since the Last Glacial Maximum. Quaternary Sci Rev. 2000;19(1–5):189–211.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Mark BG, Osmaston HA. Quaternary glaciation in Africa: key chronologies and climatic implications. J Quaternary Sci. 2008;23:589–608.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Kiage LM, Liu KB. Late Quaternary paleoenvironmental changes in East Africa: a review of multiproxy evidence from palynology, take sediments, and associated records. Prog Phys Geog. 2006;30(5):633–58.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Gottelli D, Marino J, Sillero-Zubiri C, Funk SM. The effect of the last glacial age on speciation and population genetic structure of the endangered Ethiopian wolf (Canis simensis). Mol Ecol. 2004;13(8):2275–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kebede M, Ehrich D, Taberlet P, Nemomissa S, Brochmann C. Phylogeography and conservation genetics of a giant lobelia (Lobelia giberroa) in Ethiopian and Tropical East African mountains. Mol Ecol. 2007;16(6):1233–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Belay G, Mori A. Intraspecific phylogeographic mitochondrial DNA (D-loop) variation of Gelada baboon, Theropithecus gelada, in Ethiopia. Biochem Syst Ecol. 2006;34:554–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Evans BJ, Bliss SM, Mendel SA, Tinsley RC. The Rift Valley is a major barrier to dispersal of African clawed frogs (Xenopus) in Ethiopia. Mol Ecol. 2011;20:4216–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Freilich X, Tollis M, Boissinot S. Hiding in the highlands: evolution of a frog species complex of the genus Ptychadena in the Ethiopian highlands. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2014;71:157–69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Larson TR, Castro D, Behangana M, Greenbaum E. Evolutionary history of the river frog genus Amietia (Anura: Pyxicephalidae) reveals extensive diversification in Central African highlands. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2016;99:168–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Channing A, Howell KM. Amphibians of East Africa. Ithaca: Comstock Books in Herpetology; 2006.Google Scholar
  20. Zimkus BM, Larson JG. Examination of the molecular relationships of sand frogs (Anura: Pyxicephalidae: Tomopterna) and resurrection of two species from the Horn of Africa. Zootaxa. 2011;2933:27–45.Google Scholar
  21. Loveridge JP. Strategies of Water Conservation in Southern African Frogs. Zool Afr. 1976;11(2):319–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Guisan A, Zimmermann NE. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Model. 2000;135(2–3):147–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Vences M, Thomas M, Bonett RM, Vieites DR. Deciphering amphibian diversity through DNA barcoding: chances and challenges. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005;360(1462):1859–68.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Monsen KJ, Blouin MS. Genetic structure in a montane ranid frog: restricted gene flow and nuclear-mitochondrial discordance. Mol Ecol. 2003;12(12):3275–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Garcia RJ, Crawford AJ, Mendoza AM, Ospina O, Cardenas H, Castro F. Comparative phylogeography of direct-developing frogs (Anura: Craugastoridae: Pristimantis) in the southern Andes of Colombia. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e46077.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Funk WC, Blouin MS, Corn PS, Maxell BA, Pilliod DS, Amish S, Allendorf FW. Population structure of Columbia spotted frogs (Rana luteiventris) is strongly affected by the landscape. Mol Ecol. 2005;14(2):483–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Guarnizo CE, Cannatella DC. Geographic determinants of gene flow in two sister species of tropical Andean frogs. J Hered. 2014;105(2):216–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lougheed SC, Gascon C, Jones DA, Bogart JP, Boag PT. Ridges and rivers: a test of competing hypotheses of Amazonian diversification using a dart-poison frog (Epipedobates femoralis). Proc Biol Sci. 1999;266(1431):1829–35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Murphy MA, Dezzani R, Pilliod DS, Storfer A. Landscape genetics of high mountain frog metapopulations. Mol Ecol. 2010;19(17):3634–49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Richards-Zawacki CL. Effects of slope and riparian habitat connectivity on gene flow in an endangered Panamanian frog, Atelopus varius. Divers Distrib. 2009;15:796–806.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Bonnefille R. Cenozoic vegetation, climate changes and hominid evolution in Tropical Africa. Global Planet Change. 2010;72:390–411.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Mengistu AA. Amphibian Diversity, Distribution and Conservation in the Ethiopian Highlands: Morphological, Molecular and Biogeographic Investigation on Leptopelis and Ptychadena (Anura). Basel: Basel University; 2012.Google Scholar
  33. Chen MH, Combs CA. An alternative anesthesia for amphibians: ventral application of benzocaine. Herperol Rev. 1999;30(2):34.Google Scholar
  34. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28(10):2731–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Hohna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 2012;61(3):539–42.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Drummond AJ, Suchard MA, Xie D, Rambaut A. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29(8):1969–73.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Rambaut A, Suchard MA, Xie D, Drummond AJ. Tracer v1.6. In. Edited by http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer Af; 2014.
  38. Crawford AJ. Relative rates of nucleotide substitution in frogs. J Mol Evol. 2003;57(6):636–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155(2):945–59.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 2005;14(8):2611–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Earl DA, Vonholdt BM. Structure harvester: a website and program for visualizing structure output and implemnting the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour. 2011;4(2):359–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Huelsenbeck JP, Andolfatto P. Inference of population structure under a Dirichlet process model. Genetics. 2007;175(4):1787–802.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Orozco-terWengel P, Corander J, Schlotterer C. Genealogical lineage sorting leads to significant, but incorrect Bayesian multilocus inference of population structure. Mol Ecol. 2011;20(6):1108–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Kalinowski ST. The computer program STRUCTURE does not reliably identify the main genetic clusters within species: simulations and implications for human population structure. Heredity. 2011;106(4):625–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Hausdorf B, Hennig C. Species delimitation using dominant and codominant multilocus markers. Syst Biol. 2010;59(5):491–503.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Excoffier L, Lischer HE. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour. 2010;10(3):564–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics. 1992;131(2):479–91.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989;123(3):585–95.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Fu YX. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics. 1997;147(2):915–25.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Librado P, Rozas J. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(11):1451–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Heled J, Drummond AJ. Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Mol Biol Evol. 2010;27(3):570–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Gronau I, Hubisz MJ, Gulko B, Danko CG, Siepel A. Bayesian inference of ancient human demography from individual genome sequences. Nat Genet. 2011;43(10):1031–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Freedman AH, Gronau I, Schweizer RM, Ortega-Del Vecchyo D, Han E, Silva PM, Galaverni M, Fan Z, Marx P, Lorente-Galdos B, et al. Genome sequencing highlights the dynamic early history of dogs. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(1):e1004016.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Yang Z. Likelihood and Bayes estimation of ancestral population sizes in hominoids using data from multiple loci. Genetics. 2002;162(4):1811–23.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Heled J, Drummond AJ. Bayesian inference of population size history from multiple loci. BMC Evol Biol. 2008;8:289.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model. 2006;190(3–4):231–59.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol. 2005;25(15):1965–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S, Buchmann C, Carl G, Carre G, Marquez JRG, Gruber B, Lafourcade B, Leitao PJ, et al. Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography. 2013;36(1):27–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Moreno-Amat E, Mateo RG, Nieto-Lugilde D, Morueta-Holme N, Svenning JC, Garcia-Amorena I. Impact of model complexity on cross-temporal transferability in Maxent species distribution models: An assessment using paleobotanical data. Ecol Model. 2015;312:308–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Liu CR, Berry PM, Dawson TP, Pearson RG. Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions. Ecography. 2005;28(3):385–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Nogues-Bravo D. Predicting the past distribution of species climatic niches. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2009;18(5):521–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement